Minimal Residual Disease Dynamics after Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab Treatment: Extended Off-Treatment Follow-up From the Randomized CLL14 Study

Othman Al-Sawaf, Can Zhang, Tong Lu, Michael Z Liao, Anesh Panchal, Sandra Robrecht, Travers Ching, Maneesh Tandon, Anna-Maria Fink, Eugen Tausch, Christof Schneider, Matthias Ritgen, Sebastian Böttcher, Karl-Anton Kreuzer, Brenda Chyla, Dale Miles, Clemens-Martin Wendtner, Barbara Eichhorst, Stephan Stilgenbauer, Yanwen Jiang, Michael Hallek, Kirsten Fischer, Othman Al-Sawaf, Can Zhang, Tong Lu, Michael Z Liao, Anesh Panchal, Sandra Robrecht, Travers Ching, Maneesh Tandon, Anna-Maria Fink, Eugen Tausch, Christof Schneider, Matthias Ritgen, Sebastian Böttcher, Karl-Anton Kreuzer, Brenda Chyla, Dale Miles, Clemens-Martin Wendtner, Barbara Eichhorst, Stephan Stilgenbauer, Yanwen Jiang, Michael Hallek, Kirsten Fischer

Abstract

Purpose: The CLL14 study has established one-year fixed-duration treatment of venetoclax and obinutuzumab (Ven-Obi) for patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. With all patients off treatment for at least three years, we report a detailed analysis of minimal residual disease (MRD) kinetics and long-term outcome of patients treated in the CLL14 study.

Patients and methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of obinutuzumab with 12 cycles of venetoclax or 12 cycles of chlorambucil (Clb-Obi). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point. Key secondary end points included rates of undetectable MRD and overall survival. To analyze MRD kinetics, a population-based growth model with nonlinear mixed effects approach was developed.

Results: Of 432 patients, 216 were assigned to Ven-Obi and 216 to Clb-Obi. Three months after treatment completion, 40% of patients in the Ven-Obi arm (7% in the Clb-Obi arm) had undetectable MRD levels < 10-6 by next-generation sequencing in peripheral blood. Median MRD doubling time was longer after Ven-Obi than Clb-Obi therapy (median 80 v 69 days). At a median follow-up of 52.4 months, a sustained significant PFS improvement was observed in the Ven-Obi arm compared with Clb-Obi (median not reached v 36.4 months; hazard ratio 0.33; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.45; P < .0001). The estimated 4-year PFS rate was 74.0% in the Ven-Obi and 35.4% in the Clb-Obi arm. No difference in overall survival was observed (hazard ratio 0.85; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.35; P = .49). No new safety signals occurred.

Conclusion: Appearance of MRD after Ven-Obi is significantly slower than that after Clb-Obi with more effective MRD reduction. These findings translate into a superior long-term efficacy with the majority of Ven-Obi-treated patients remaining in remission.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02242942.

Conflict of interest statement

Othman Al-SawafHonoraria: Janssen-Cilag, Roche, Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Adaptive Biotechnologies, BeiGeneConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Gilead Sciences, AbbVieResearch Funding: BeiGene (Inst), Roche (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Janssen/Pharmacyclics (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag Tong LuEmployment: Genentech/RocheStock and Other Ownership Interests: RochePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: P36418-US Title: Methods and systems for placebo response modeling Michael Z. LiaoEmployment: Genentech/RocheStock and Other Ownership Interests: Roche, Amgen Anesh PanchalEmployment: Genentech/Roche Travers ChingEmployment: Adaptive BiotechnologiesStock and Other Ownership Interests: Adaptive Biotechnologies Maneesh TandonEmployment: Roche (I)Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Roche Pharma AG Anna-Maria FinkResearch Funding: Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AbbVie Eugen TauschConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, AbbVieSpeakers' Bureau: Roche, AbbVie, Janssen-CilagTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AbbVie Matthias RitgenHonoraria: Roche, Janssen Oncology, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, MSDConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, Roche, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: Roche (Inst), AbbVie (Inst)Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Partial patent holder, only intellectual propertyTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, Takeda Sebastian BöttcherHonoraria: Roche, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, SanofiConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, JanssenResearch Funding: Janssen (Inst) Karl-Anton KreuzerHonoraria: Roche, AbbVieConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, AbbVieSpeakers' Bureau: Roche, AbbVieResearch Funding: Roche (Inst), AbbVie (Inst)Expert Testimony: Roche, AbbVieTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, AbbVie Brenda ChylaEmployment: AbbVieStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVie Dale MilesEmployment: GenentechStock and Other Ownership Interests: GenentechTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Genentech Clemens-Martin WendtnerHonoraria: Roche, Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Gilead SciencesConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Gilead SciencesResearch Funding: Roche, Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Gilead SciencesTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Gilead Sciences Barbara EichhorstHonoraria: Roche, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Novartis, Hexal, AstraZeneca, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Oxford Biomedica, Miltenyi BiotecConsulting or Advisory Role: Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag, Roche, AbbVie, Novartis, Celgene, AstraZeneca, ArQuleSpeakers' Bureau: Roche/Genentech, Janssen-Cilag, Gilead Sciences, Celgene, AbbVie, NovartisResearch Funding: Roche, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Beijing Genomics InstituteTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Stephan StilgenbauerHonoraria: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, JanssenConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, JanssenSpeakers' Bureau: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, JanssenResearch Funding: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, JanssenTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Janssen Yanwen JiangEmployment: GenentechStock and Other Ownership Interests: Genentech Michael HallekHonoraria: Roche, Janssen, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, AstraZenecaConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Genentech/Roche, AstraZenecaSpeakers' Bureau: Janssen, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Roche/Genentech, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: Roche (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Janssen (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Janssen Kirsten FischerHonoraria: AbbVie, RocheConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: RocheNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Follow-up month 3 (ie, 2 months after treatment completion) minimal residual disease status by next-generation sequencing on the basis of intention-to-treat population. Clb-Obi, chlorambucil-obinutuzumab; MRD, minimal residual disease; NE, not evaluable; PD, progressive disease; Ven-Obi, venetoclax-obinutuzumab.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
(A) Sankey plot for MRD levels by NGS between cycle 7 and FUm3 (ie, 2 months after treatment completion) in the Ven-Obi arm (patients during Ven-Obi treatment). (B) Waterfall plot for the 14 patients with detectable MRD (≥ 10−4) at FUm3 in the Ven-Obi arm and available MRD assessment at cycle 7 by NGS, with each bar representing absolute log changes from cycle 7 to FUm3 per patient. FUm3, follow-up month 3; H-MRD, high minimal residual disease; L-MRD, low minimal residual disease; MRD, minimal residual disease; NGS, next-generation sequencing; PD, progressive disease; Ven-Obi, venetoclax-obinutuzumab.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
(A) Model calibration for (left) Clb-Obi and (right) Ven-Obi arms. (B) Time to MRD doubling and (C) time to MRD 10−2 in days, predicted by the growth model. (D) Time to MRD conversion (≥ 10−4) according to the treatment arm, from EoT. (E) Time to MRD conversion (≥ 10−4) according to the treatment arm and BM MRD status, from EoT. (F) PFS according to BM MRD status, from last treatment exposure. BM, bone marrow; Clb-Obi, chlorambucil-obinutuzumab; EoT, end of treatment; H-MRD, high minimal residual disease; L-MRD, low minimal residual disease; MRD, minimal residual disease; PFS, progression-free survival; uMRD, undetectable minimal residual disease; Ven-Obi, venetoclax-obinutuzumab.
FIG 4.
FIG 4.
Sankey plot showing MRD levels, measured by next-generation sequencing, from baseline to latest FU visit in the (A) Ven-Obi (n = 216) and (B) Clb-Obi (n = 216) arm. Percentages are provided in relation to the intention-to-treat population. Clb-Obi, chlorambucil-obinutuzumab; FU, follow-up; H-MRD, high minimal residual disease; L-MRD, low minimal residual disease; MRD, minimal residual disease; PD, progressive disease; Ven-Obi, venetoclax-obinutuzumab.
FIG 5.
FIG 5.
Kaplan-Meier analyses for PFS according to (A) the study arm, (B) status of TP53 aberrations and study arm, and (C) IGHV status and study arm. Clb-Obi, chlorambucil-obinutuzumab; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; Ven-Obi, venetoclax-obinutuzumab.
FIG 6.
FIG 6.
Kaplan-Meier analysis for (A) TTNT per study arm and (B) OS per study arm. Clb-Obi, chlorambucil-obinutuzumab; OS, overall survival; TTNT, time to next anti-leukemic treatment; Ven-Obi, venetoclax-obinutuzumab.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8678026/bin/jco-39-4049-g001.jpg

References

    1. Del Giudice I, Raponi S, Della Starza I, et al. : Minimal residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A new goal? Front Oncol 9:689, 2019
    1. Thompson M, Brander D, Nabhan C, et al. : Minimal residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the era of novel agents: A review. JAMA Oncol 4:394-400, 2018
    1. Rawstron AC, Fazi C, Agathangelidis A, et al. : A complementary role of multiparameter flow cytometry and high-throughput sequencing for minimal residual disease detection in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: An European Research Initiative on CLL study. Leukemia 30:929-936, 2016
    1. Ching T, Duncan ME, Newman-Eerkes T, et al. : Analytical evaluation of the clonoSEQ Assay for establishing measurable (minimal) residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and multiple myeloma. BMC Cancer 20:612, 2020
    1. Al-Sawaf O, Zhang C, Tandon M, et al. : Venetoclax plus obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab for previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL14): Follow-up results from a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 21:1188-1200, 2020
    1. Fischer K, Al-Sawaf O, Bahlo J, et al. : Venetoclax and obinutuzumab in patients with CLL and coexisting conditions. N Engl J Med 380:2225-2236, 2019
    1. Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D, et al. : Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines. Blood 111:5446-5456, 2008
    1. Rawstron AC, Bottcher S, Letestu R, et al. : Improving efficiency and sensitivity: European Research Initiative in CLL (ERIC) update on the international harmonised approach for flow cytometric residual disease monitoring in CLL. Leukemia 27:142-149, 2013
    1. Rawstron AC, Villamor N, Ritgen M, et al. : International standardized approach for flow cytometric residual disease monitoring in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Leukemia 21:956-964, 2007
    1. van der Velden VH, Cazzaniga G, Schrauder A, et al. : Analysis of minimal residual disease by Ig/TCR gene rearrangements: Guidelines for interpretation of real-time quantitative PCR data. Leukemia 21:604-611, 2007
    1. Bergstrand M, Karlsson MO: Handling data below the limit of quantification in mixed effect models. AAPS J 11:371-380, 2009
    1. Mould DR, Upton RN: Basic concepts in population modeling, simulation, and model-based drug development. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 1:e6, 2012
    1. Bottcher S, Ritgen M, Fischer K, et al. : Minimal residual disease quantification is an independent predictor of progression-free and overall survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A multivariate analysis from the randomized GCLLSG CLL8 trial. J Clin Oncol 30:980-988, 2012
    1. Kater AP, Seymour JF, Hillmen P, et al. : Fixed duration of venetoclax-rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia eradicates minimal residual disease and prolongs survival: Post-treatment follow-up of the MURANO phase III study. J Clin Oncol 37:269-277, 2019
    1. Kater AP, Wu JQ, Kipps T, et al. : Venetoclax plus rituximab in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia: 4-Year results and evaluation of impact of genomic complexity and gene mutations from the MURANO phase III study. J Clin Oncol 38:4042-4054, 2020
    1. Kovacs G, Robrecht S, Fink AM, et al. : Minimal residual disease assessment improves prediction of outcome in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who achieve partial response: Comprehensive analysis of two phase III studies of the German CLL Study Group. J Clin Oncol 34:3758-3765, 2016
    1. Patel K, Pagel JM: Current and future treatment strategies in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Hematol Oncol 14:69, 2021
    1. Bottcher S, Hallek M, Ritgen M, et al. : The role of minimal residual disease measurements in the therapy for CLL: Is it ready for prime time? Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 27:267-288, 2013
    1. Scarfo L, Heltai S, Albi E, et al. : Minimal residual disease-driven treatment intensification by sequential addition of ibrutinib to venetoclax in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Results of the monotherapy and combination phases of the improve study. Presented at the ASH 2020, 2020
    1. Al-Sawaf O, Lilienweiss E, Bahlo J, et al. : High efficacy of venetoclax plus obinutuzumab in patients with complex karyotype and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 135:866-870, 2020
    1. Tausch E, Schneider C, Robrecht S, et al. : Prognostic and predictive impact of genetic markers in patients with CLL treated with obinutuzumab and venetoclax. Blood 135:2402-2412, 2020
    1. Moreno C, Greil R, Demirkan F, et al. : Ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab in first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (iLLUMINATE): A multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 20:43-56, 2019
    1. Shanafelt TD, Wang XV, Kay NE, et al. : Ibrutinib-rituximab or chemoimmunotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 381:432-443, 2019
    1. Sharman JP, Egyed M, Jurczak W, et al. : Acalabrutinib with or without obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil and obinutuzmab for treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (ELEVATE TN): A randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 395:1278-1291, 2020
    1. Woyach JA, Ruppert AS, Heerema NA, et al. : Ibrutinib regimens versus chemoimmunotherapy in older patients with untreated CLL. N Engl J Med 379:2517-2528, 2018
    1. Beal SL: Ways to fit a PK model with some data below the quantification limit. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 28:481-504, 2001
    1. Tausch E, Schneider C, Yosifov D, et al. : Genetic markers and outcome with front line obinutuzumab plus either chlorambucil or venetoclax—Updated analysis of the CLL14 trial. Hematologic Oncol 39:62-64, 2021

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel