Cefoxitin versus piperacillin-tazobactam as surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Nicole M Nevarez, Brian C Brajcich, Jason Liu, Ryan Ellis, Clifford Y Ko, Henry A Pitt, Michael I D'Angelica, Adam C Yopp, Nicole M Nevarez, Brian C Brajcich, Jason Liu, Ryan Ellis, Clifford Y Ko, Henry A Pitt, Michael I D'Angelica, Adam C Yopp

Abstract

Introduction: Although antibiotic prophylaxis is established in reducing postoperative surgical site infections (SSIs), the optimal antibiotic for prophylaxis in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) remains unclear. The study objective is to evaluate if administration of piperacillin-tazobactam as antibiotic prophylaxis results in decreased 30-day SSI rate compared with cefoxitin in patients undergoing elective PD.

Methods and analysis: This study will be a multi-institution, double-arm, non-blinded randomised controlled superiority trial. Adults ≥18 years consented to undergo PD for all indications who present to institutions participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (NSQIP HPB) Collaborative will be included. Data collection will use the NSQIP HPB Collaborative Surgical Clinical Reviewers. Patients will be randomised to either 1-2 g intravenous cefoxitin or 3.375-4.5 g intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam within 60 min of surgical incision. The primary outcome will be 30-day postoperative SSI rate following PD. Secondary outcomes will include 30-day postoperative mortality; specific postoperative complication rate; and unplanned reoperation, length of stay, and hospital readmission. A subset of patients will have bacterial isolates and sensitivities of intraoperative bile cultures and SSIs. Postoperative SSIs and secondary outcomes will be analysed using logistic regression models with the primary predictor as the randomised treatment group. Additional adjustment will be made for preoperative biliary stent presence. Additionally, bacterial cultures and isolates will be summarised by presence of bacterial species and antibiotic sensitivities.

Ethics and dissemination: This study is approved by the Institutional Review Board at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. This trial will evaluate the effect of piperacillin-tazobactam compared with cefoxitin as antibiotic prophylaxis on the hazard of postoperative SSIs. The results will be disseminated regardless of the effect of the intervention on study outcomes. The manuscript describing the effect of the intervention will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal when data collection and analyses are complete.

Trial registration number: NCT03269994.

Keywords: adult surgery; clinical trials; infection control; pancreatic surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Magill SS, Edwards JR, Bamberg W, et al. . Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infections. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1198–208. 10.1056/NEJMoa1306801
    1. Smit LC, Bruins MJ, Patijn GA, et al. . Infectious complications after major abdominal cancer surgery: in search of improvable risk factors. Surg Infect 2016;17:683–93. 10.1089/sur.2016.033
    1. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (ACS NSQIP HPB) . Procedure targeted pancreatectomy program; 2018.
    1. Suragul W, Rungsakulkij N, Vassanasiri W, et al. . Predictors of surgical site infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy. BMC Gastroenterol 2020;20:1–10. 10.1186/s12876-020-01350-8
    1. Ceppa EP, Pitt HA, House MG. Reducing surgical site infections in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery 2013;15:384–91.
    1. Povoski SP, Karpeh MS, Conlon KC, et al. . Preoperative biliary drainage: impact on intraoperative bile cultures and infectious morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 1999;3:496–505. 10.1016/S1091-255X(99)80103-6
    1. Howard TJ, Yu J, Greene RB, et al. . Influence of bactibilia after preoperative biliary stenting on postoperative infectious complications. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:523–31. 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.08.011
    1. Cataife G, Weinberg DA, Wong H-H, et al. . The effect of surgical care improvement project (SCIP) compliance on surgical site infections (SSI). Med Care 2014;52:S66–73. 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000028
    1. Hawn MT, Vick CC, Richman J, et al. . Surgical site infection prevention: time to move beyond the surgical care improvement program. Ann Surg 2011;254:494–9. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822c6929
    1. Stulberg JJ, et al. . Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections. JAMA 2010;303:2479–85. 10.1001/jama.2010.841
    1. Anderson DJ, Podgorny K, Berríos-Torres SI, et al. . Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:605–27. 10.1086/676022
    1. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. . Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:247–80. 10.1086/501620
    1. Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, et al. . Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2013;70:195–283. 10.2146/ajhp120568
    1. Sudo T, Murakami Y, Uemura K, et al. . Perioperative antibiotics covering bile contamination prevent abdominal infectious complications after pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with preoperative biliary drainage. World J Surg 2014;38:2952–9. 10.1007/s00268-014-2688-7
    1. Barreto SG, Singh MK, Sharma S, et al. . Determinants of surgical site infections following pancreatoduodenectomy. World J Surg 2015;39:2557–63. 10.1007/s00268-015-3115-4
    1. Cortes A, Sauvanet A, Bert F, et al. . Effect of bile contamination on immediate outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy for tumor. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:93–9. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.09.006
    1. Sourrouille I, Gaujoux S, Lacave G, et al. . Five days of postoperative antimicrobial therapy decreases infectious complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients at risk for bile contamination. HPB 2013;15:473–80. 10.1111/hpb.12012
    1. Gavazzi F, Ridolfi C, Capretti G, et al. . Role of preoperative biliary stents, bile contamination and antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical site infections after pancreaticoduodenectomy. BMC Gastroenterol 2016;16:1–11. 10.1186/s12876-016-0460-1
    1. Limongelli P, Pai M, Bansi D, et al. . Correlation between preoperative biliary drainage, bile duct contamination, and postoperative outcomes for pancreatic surgery. Surgery 2007;142:313–8. 10.1016/j.surg.2007.04.022
    1. Fong ZV, McMillan MT, Marchegiani G, et al. . Discordance between perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and wound infection cultures in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. JAMA Surg 2016;151:432. 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4510
    1. Donald GW, Sunjaya D, Lu X, et al. . Perioperative antibiotics for surgical site infection in pancreaticoduodenectomy: does the SCIP-approved regimen provide adequate coverage? Surgery 2013;154:190–6. 10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.001
    1. Kondo K, Chijiiwa K, Ohuchida J, et al. . Selection of prophylactic antibiotics according to the microorganisms isolated from surgical site infections (SSIs) in a previous series of surgeries reduces SSI incidence after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013;20:286–93. 10.1007/s00534-012-0515-9
    1. De Pastena M, Paiella S, Azzini AM, et al. . Antibiotic prophylaxis with piperacillin-tazobactam reduces post-operative infectious complication after pancreatic surgery: an interventional, Non-Randomized study. Surg Infect 2020. 10.1089/sur.2020.260. [Epub ahead of print: 23 Oct 2020].
    1. Parikh P, Shiloach M, Cohen ME, et al. . Pancreatectomy risk calculator: an ACS-NSQIP resource. HPB 2010;12:488–97. 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00216.x
    1. Shiloach M, Frencher SK, Steeger JE, et al. . Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg 2010;210:6–16. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.031

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel