Tofacitinib, an Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitor: Pooled Efficacy and Safety Analyses in an Australian Rheumatoid Arthritis Population

Stephen Hall, Peter Nash, Maureen Rischmueller, David Bossingham, Paul Bird, Nicola Cook, David Witcombe, Koshika Soma, Kenneth Kwok, Krishan Thirunavukkarasu, Stephen Hall, Peter Nash, Maureen Rischmueller, David Bossingham, Paul Bird, Nicola Cook, David Witcombe, Koshika Soma, Kenneth Kwok, Krishan Thirunavukkarasu

Abstract

Introduction: In Australia, there is an unmet need for improved treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of RA. To provide an overview of key study outcomes for tofacitinib in Australian patients, we analyzed the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in the Australian subpopulation of global RA phase III and long-term extension (LTE) studies.

Methods: Data were pooled from the Australian subpopulation of four phase III studies and one LTE study (database not locked at cut-off date: January 2016). Patients in the phase III studies received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID), placebo (advancing to tofacitinib at months 3 or 6), or adalimumab, with background methotrexate or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Patients in the LTE study received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID. Efficacy endpoints were American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response rates, and change from baseline in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28-4(ESR)] and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores. Safety endpoints included incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and discontinuations due to AEs. AEs of special interest and laboratory parameters were analyzed in the LTE study.

Results: Across phase III studies (N = 100), ACR response rates and improvements in DAS28-4(ESR) and HAQ-DI scores were numerically greater with tofacitinib vs. placebo at month 3, and increased until month 12. The results were sustained in the LTE study (N = 99) after 60 months' observation. In general, the efficacy and safety profiles of tofacitinib were similar to those of the global RA population.

Conclusions: In Australian patients with RA, tofacitinib therapy demonstrated sustained efficacy and consistent safety over ≥ 60 months' treatment.

Funding: Pfizer Inc. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS (ALL CLINICALTRIALS.GOV): NCT00960440; NCT00847613; NCT00856544; NCT00853385; NCT00413699.

Keywords: Australia; Efficacy; Rheumatoid arthritis; Safety; Tofacitinib.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Efficacy over time in the pooled phase III study population, as measured by a ACR20 response rates, b ACR50 response rates, c ACR70 response rates, d proportion of patients achieving clinical remission and LDA at month 12, as measured by DAS28-4(ESR), e mean change from baseline in DAS28-4(ESR), and f mean change from baseline in HAQ-DI (FAS, no imputation). Remission was defined as DAS28-4(ESR) < 2.6. LDA was defined as DAS28-4(ESR) ≤ 3.2. ACR American College of Rheumatology, BID twice daily, DAS28-4(ESR) Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, FAS full analysis set, HAQ-DI Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, LDA low disease activity, Q2W every other week, SE standard error
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PROs in the pooled phase III study population showing the mean changes from baseline a across eight SF-36 domain scores at month 3, b in SF-36 PCS to month 12, and c in SF-36 MCS to month 12 (FAS, no imputation). BID twice daily, FAS full analysis set, MCS mental component summary, PCS physical component summary, PROs patient-reported outcomes, Q2W every other week, SE standard error, SF-36 Short Form-36 Health Survey
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Summary of changes in laboratory variables following treatment with tofacitiniba during the LTE study, showing mean change from baseline in a hemoglobin (g/dl), b absolute lymphocyte count (109 cells/l), c absolute neutrophil count (109 cells/l), d serum creatinine (mg/dl), and e HDL and LDL cholesterol (percent change). BID twice daily, HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein, LTE long-term extension, SE standard error, TDD total daily dose

References

    1. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2016;388:2023–2038. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30173-8.
    1. Strand V, Singh JA. Newer biological agents in rheumatoid arthritis: impact on health-related quality of life and productivity. Drugs. 2010;70:121–145. doi: 10.2165/11531980-000000000-00000.
    1. Lassere MN, Rappo J, Portek IJ, Sturgess A, Edmonds JP. How many life years are lost in patients with rheumatoid arthritis? Secular cause-specific and all-cause mortality in rheumatoid arthritis, and their predictors in a long-term Australian cohort study. Intern Med J. 2013;43:66–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02727.x.
    1. van den Hoek J, Boshuizen HC, Roorda LD, et al. Mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 15-year prospective cohort study. Rheumatol Int. 2017;37:487–493. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3638-5.
    1. Strand V, Khanna D. The impact of rheumatoid arthritis and treatment on patients’ lives. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010;28:S32–S40.
    1. Harrison C, Britt H, Miller G, Henderson J. Prevalence of chronic conditions in Australia. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067494.
    1. Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, et al. The global burden of rheumatoid arthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:1316–1322. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204627.
    1. Lau CS, Chia F, Harrison A, et al. APLAR rheumatoid arthritis treatment recommendations. Int J Rheum Dis. 2015;18:685–713. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12754.
    1. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of early rheumatoid arthritis. (2009). . Accessed 22 June 2017.
    1. Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL, Jr, et al. 2015 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthr Rheumatol. 2016;68:1–26.
    1. Smolen JS, Landewé R, Bijlsma J, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:960–977. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715.
    1. Littlejohn G, Roberts L, Arnold M, et al. A multi-center, observational study shows high proportion of Australian rheumatoid arthritis patients have inadequate disease control. Int J Rheum Dis. 2013;16:532–538. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12163.
    1. Montag K, Gingold M, Boers A, Littlejohn G. Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug usage, prescribing patterns and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients in community-based practice. Intern Med J. 2011;41:450–455. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2010.02240.x.
    1. Alten R, Krüger K, Rellecke J, et al. Examining patient preferences in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis using a discrete-choice approach. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:2217–2228. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S117774.
    1. Louder AM, Singh A, Saverno K, et al. Patient preferences regarding rheumatoid arthritis therapies: a conjoint analysis. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2016;9:84–93.
    1. Fleischmann R, Cutolo M, Genovese MC, et al. Phase IIb dose-ranging study of the oral JAK inhibitor tofacitinib (CP-690,550) or adalimumab monotherapy versus placebo in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Arthr Rheum. 2012;64:617–629. doi: 10.1002/art.33383.
    1. Kremer JM, Cohen S, Wilkinson BE, et al. A phase IIb dose-ranging study of the oral JAK inhibitor tofacitinib (CP-690,550) versus placebo in combination with background methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate alone. Arthr Rheum. 2012;64:970–981. doi: 10.1002/art.33419.
    1. Kremer JM, Bloom BJ, Breedveld FC, et al. The safety and efficacy of a JAK inhibitor in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIa trial of three dosage levels of CP-690,550 versus placebo. Arthr Rheum. 2009;60:1895–1905. doi: 10.1002/art.24567.
    1. Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, Yamanaka H, Nakamura H, Toyoizumi S, Zwillich S. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib as monotherapy in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a 12-week, randomized, phase 2 study. Mod Rheumatol. 2015;25:514–521. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2014.995875.
    1. Tanaka Y, Suzuki M, Nakamura H, Toyoizumi S, Zwillich SH. Tofacitinib Study Investigators. Phase II study of tofacitinib (CP-690,550) combined with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate. Arthr Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63:1150–1158. doi: 10.1002/acr.20494.
    1. Burmester GR, Panaccione R, Gordon KB, McIlraith MJ, Lacerda AP. Adalimumab: long-term safety in 23,458 patients from global clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis and Crohn’s disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:517–524. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201244.
    1. Fleischmann R, Kremer J, Cush J, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of tofacitinib monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:495–507. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109071.
    1. Kremer J, Li Z-G, Hall S, et al. Tofacitinib in combination with nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:253–261. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-4-201308200-00006.
    1. Lee EB, Fleischmann R, Hall S, et al. Tofacitinib versus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2377–2386. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310476.
    1. van der Heijde D, Tanaka Y, Fleischmann R, et al. Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate: 12-month data from a 24-month phase III randomized radiographic study. Arthr Rheum. 2013;65:559–570. doi: 10.1002/art.37816.
    1. van Vollenhoven RF, Fleischmann R, Cohen S, et al. Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:508–519. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112072.
    1. Yamanaka H, Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, et al. Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, as monotherapy or with background methotrexate, in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an open-label, long-term extension study. Arthr Res Ther. 2016;18:34. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-0932-2.
    1. Wollenhaupt J, Silverfield J, Lee EB, et al. Safety and efficacy of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in open-label, long-term extension studies. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:837–852. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130683.
    1. Wollenhaupt J, Silverfield J, Lee EB, et al. Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: safety and efficacy in open-label, long-term extension studies over 9 years. Arthr Rheumatol. 2017;69(Suppl 10):683–684.
    1. Australian Government Therapeutic Goods Administration. Product Information: XELJANZ® tofacitinib (as citrate) tablet. (2017). . Accessed 29 Nov 2017.
    1. Smolen JS, Landewé R, Breedveld FC, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2013 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:492–509. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204573.
    1. Strand V, Boers M, Idzerda L, et al. It’s good to feel better but it’s better to feel good and even better to feel good as soon as possible for as long as possible. Response criteria and the importance of change at OMERACT 10. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:1720–1727. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110392.
    1. Lubeck DP. Patient-reported outcomes and their role in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22:27–38. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422001-00004.
    1. Cella D, Yount S, Sorensen M, Chartash E, Sengupta N, Grober J. Validation of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy fatigue scale relative to other instrumentation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:811–819.
    1. Curtis JR, Lee EB, Martin G, et al. Analysis of non-melanoma skin cancer across the tofacitinib rheumatoid arthritis clinical programme. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017;35:614–622.
    1. Apalla Z, Lallas A, Sotiriou E, Lazaridou E, Ioannides D. Epidemiological trends in skin cancer. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2017;7:1–6. doi: 10.5826/dpc.0702a01.
    1. Perera E, Gnaneswaran N, Staines C, Win AK, Sinclair R. Incidence and prevalence of non-melanoma skin cancer in Australia: a systematic review. Australas J Dermatol. 2015;56:258–267. doi: 10.1111/ajd.12282.
    1. Marcil I, Stern RS. Risk of developing a subsequent nonmelanoma skin cancer in patients with a history of nonmelanoma skin cancer: a critical review of the literature and meta-analysis. Arch Dermatol. 2000;136:1524–1530. doi: 10.1001/archderm.136.12.1524.
    1. Cohen SB, Tanaka Y, Mariette X, et al. Long-term safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis up to 8.5 years: integrated analysis of data from the global clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:1253–1262. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210457.
    1. Schulze-Koops H, Strand V, Nduaka C, et al. Analysis of haematological changes in tofacitinib-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis across phase 3 and long-term extension studies. Rheumatol (Oxf) 2017;56:46–57. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew329.
    1. Statista. Australia: Ethnic groups as of 2011. (2018). . Accessed 4 Dec 2018.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel