TENAYA and LUCERNE: Rationale and Design for the Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Faricimab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Arshad M Khanani, Robyn H Guymer, Karen Basu, Heather Boston, Jeffrey S Heier, Jean-François Korobelnik, Aachal Kotecha, Hugh Lin, David Silverman, Balakumar Swaminathan, Jeffrey R Willis, Young Hee Yoon, Carlos Quezada-Ruiz, Arshad M Khanani, Robyn H Guymer, Karen Basu, Heather Boston, Jeffrey S Heier, Jean-François Korobelnik, Aachal Kotecha, Hugh Lin, David Silverman, Balakumar Swaminathan, Jeffrey R Willis, Young Hee Yoon, Carlos Quezada-Ruiz

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the design and rationale of the phase 3 TENAYA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03823287) and LUCERNE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03823300) trials that aimed to assess efficacy, safety, and durability of faricimab, the first bispecific antibody for intraocular use, which independently binds and neutralizes both angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) versus aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Design: Identical, global, double-masked, randomized, controlled, phase 3 clinical trials.

Participants: Adults with treatment-naïve nAMD.

Methods: These trials were designed to evaluate patients randomized to receive faricimab 6.0 mg up to every 16 weeks after 4 initial every-4-week doses or aflibercept 2.0 mg every 8 weeks after 3 initial every-4-week doses. The initial doses in the faricimab arm were followed by individualized fixed treatment intervals up to week 60, based on disease activity assessment at weeks 20 and 24, guided by central subfield thickness, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and investigator assessment. The primary efficacy end point was BCVA change from baseline averaged over weeks 40, 44, and 48. Secondary end points included the proportion of patients receiving every-8-week, every-12-week, and every-16-week faricimab and anatomic outcomes. Safety outcomes included incidence and severity of ocular and nonocular adverse events. From week 60, faricimab-treated patients followed a personalized treatment interval (PTI), a novel protocol-driven treat-and-extend regimen with interval adjustment from every 8 weeks to every 16 weeks based on individualized treatment response measured by anatomic criteria, functional criteria, and investigator assessment of patients' disease activity.

Main outcome measures: Rationale for trial design and PTI approach.

Results: The TENAYA and LUCERNE trials were the first registrational trials in nAMD to test fixed dosing regimens up to every 16 weeks based on patients' disease activity in year 1 and incorporate a PTI paradigm during year 2. The PTI approach was designed to tailor treatment intervals to individual patient needs, to reflect clinical practice treatment practice, and to reduce treatment burden.

Conclusions: The innovative trial design rationale for the TENAYA and LUCERNE trials included maximizing the benefits of angiopoietin-2 blockade through dosing up to every 16 weeks and PTI regimens based on patients' disease activity while fulfilling health authority requirements for potential registrational efforts.

Keywords: Anti-VEGF therapy; BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; CNV, choroidal neovascularization; CRC, central reading center; CST, central subfield thickness; FFA, fundus fluorescein angiography; Faricimab; Neovascular age-related macular degeneration; PTI, personalized treatment interval; Personalized treatment interval; T&E, treat-and-extend; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; nAMD, neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

© 2021 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram showing (A) study profile and (B) study design of the TENAYA and LUCERNE trials. ∗Protocol-defined assessment of disease activity at weeks 20 and 24. Patients with anatomic or functional signs of disease activity at these time points received treatment every 8 weeks (Q8W) or every 12 weeks, respectively. †Change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), as measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 m, based on an average of the week 40, 44, and 48 visits. ‡Personalized treatment interval (PTI): interactive voice or web-based response systemguided flexible dosing in the faricimab arms starting at week 60. From week 60 onward, patients in the faricimab arm are treated according to a PTI dosing regimen between Q8W and every 16 weeks (Q16W). CST = central subfield thickness; nAMD = neovascular age-related macular degeneration; R = randomized.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Personalized treatment interval (PTI) scenario examples. A, Disease activity resulting from best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) met at week 24 and patient dosed every 12 weeks (Q12W) until week 60; at week 60, based on PTI assessment, patient meets the criteria for interval extension from Q12W to every 16 weeks (Q16W). B, No disease activity observed at weeks 20 and 24 and patient dosed Q16W until week 60; patient meets the PTI criteria for interval reduction at week 60, and interval reduced from Q16W to Q12W because of a 10-letter decrease in BCVA at week 60 compared with the highest on-study drug dosing measurement that is attributable to neovascular age-related macular degeneration disease activity. C, Active disease at week 20 resulting from both BCVA decrease and central subfield thickness (CST) increase compared with the previous 2 visits, resulting in the patient being dosed every 8 weeks (Q8W) until week 60; during the week 60 PTI assessment, patient meets the interval extension criteria from Q8W to Q12W. ETDRS = Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study.

References

    1. Wong W.L., Su X., Li X., et al. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(2):e106–e116.
    1. Brown D.M., Michels M., Kaiser P.K., et al. Ranibizumab versus verteporfin photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: two-year results of the ANCHOR study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(1):57–65.e5.
    1. Rosenfeld P.J., Brown D.M., Heier J.S., et al. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(14):1419–1431.
    1. Heier J.S., Brown D.M., Chong V., et al. Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF Trap-Eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(12):2537–2548.
    1. Wykoff C.C., Clark W.L., Nielsen J.S., et al. Optimizing anti-VEGF treatment outcomes for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018;24(2-a Suppl):S3–S15.
    1. Liu K., Song Y., Xu G., et al. Conbercept for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results of the randomized phase 3 PHOENIX study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;197:156–167.
    1. Dugel P.U., Koh A., Ogura Y., et al. HAWK and HARRIER: phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-masked trials of brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(1):72–84.
    1. Adamis A.P., Brittain C.J., Dandekar A., Hopkins J.J. Building on the success of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy: a vision for the next decade. Eye (Lond) 2020;34:1966–1972.
    1. American Academy of Ophthalmology Retina/Vitreous Committee, Hoskins Center for Quality Eye Care Age-related macular degeneration Preferred Practice Pattern®. Available at: Accessed 16.09.20.
    1. Finger R.P., Daien V., Eldem B.M., et al. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor in neovascular age-related macular degeneration—a systematic review of the impact of anti-VEGF on patient outcomes and healthcare systems. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20:294.
    1. Rostron E., McKibbin M. Visual impairment certification secondary to ARMD in Leeds, 2005–2010: is the incidence falling? Eye (Lond) 2012;26(7):933–936.
    1. Maguire M.G., Martin D.F., Ying G.-S., et al. Five-year outcomes with anti–vascular endothelial growth factor treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(8):1751–1761.
    1. Martin D.F., Maguire M.G., et al. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: two-year results. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(7):1388–1398.
    1. Holz F.G., Tadayoni R., Beatty S., et al. Multi-country real-life experience of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for wet age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(2):220–226.
    1. Finger R.P., Puth M.-T., Schmid M., et al. Lifetime outcomes of anti–vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020;138:1234–1240.
    1. Kim L.N., Mehta H., Barthelmes D., et al. Metaanalysis of real-world outcomes of intravitreal ranibizumab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2016;36(8):1418–1431.
    1. Ciulla T.A., Hussain R.M., Pollack J.S., Williams D.F. Visual acuity outcomes and anti–vascular endothelial growth factor therapy intensity in neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients: a real-world analysis of 49 485 eyes. Ophthalmol Retina. 2020;4(1):19–30.
    1. Gohil R., Crosby-Nwaobi R., Forbes A., et al. Caregiver burden in patients receiving ranibizumab therapy for neovascular age related macular degeneration. PLoS One. 2015;10(6)
    1. Varano M., Eter N., Winyard S., et al. Current barriers to treatment for wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD): findings from the wAMD patient and caregiver survey. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:2243–2250.
    1. Khanani A.M., Skelly A., Bezlyak V., et al. Sierra-AMD: a retrospective, real-world evidence study of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration in the United States. Ophthalmol Retina. 2020;4(2):122–133.
    1. Schmidt-Erfurth U., Eldem B., Guymer R., et al. Efficacy and safety of monthly versus quarterly ranibizumab treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: the EXCITE study. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(5):831–839.
    1. Abraham P., Yue H., Wilson L. Randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled trial of ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: PIER study year 2. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150(3):315–324.e1.
    1. Regillo C.D., Brown D.M., Abraham P., et al. Randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled trial of ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: PIER study year 1. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(2):239–248.
    1. Joussen A.M., Ricci F., Paris L.P., et al. Angiopoietin/Tie2 signalling and its role in retinal and choroidal vascular diseases: a review of preclinical data. Eye (Lond) 2021;35:1305–1316.
    1. Schmidt-Erfurth U., Kaiser P.K., Korobelnik J.-F., et al. Intravitreal aflibercept injection for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: ninety-six-week results of the VIEW studies. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(1):193–201.
    1. Regula J.T., Lundh von Leithner P., Foxton R., et al. Targeting key angiogenic pathways with a bispecific crossmab optimized for neovascular eye diseases. EMBO Mol Med. 2016;8(11):1265–1288.
    1. Schaefer W., Regula J.T., Bähner M., et al. Immunoglobulin domain crossover as a generic approach for the production of bispecific IgG antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(27):11187–11192.
    1. Chakravarthy U., Bailey C., Brown D., et al. Phase I trial of anti–vascular endothelial growth factor/anti-angiopoietin 2 bispecific antibody RG7716 for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmol Retina. 2017;1(6):474–485.
    1. Sahni J., Dugel P.U., Patel S.S., et al. Safety and efficacy of different doses and regimens of faricimab vs ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: the AVENUE phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020;138:955–963.
    1. Khanani A.M., Patel S.S., Ferrone P.J., et al. Efficacy of every four monthly and quarterly dosing of faricimab vs ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: the STAIRWAY phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020;138:964–972.
    1. Spaide R.F., Jaffe G.J., Sarraf D., et al. Consensus nomenclature for reporting neovascular age-related macular degeneration data: Consensus on Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Nomenclature study group. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(5):616–636.
    1. American Society of Retina Specialists ASRS 2020 preferences and trends membership survey. 2020. Available at: Accessed 12.05.21.
    1. Foxton R.H., Uhles S., Grüner S., et al. Efficacy of simultaneous VEGF-A/Ang-2 neutralization in suppressing spontaneous choroidal neovascularization. EMBO Mol Med. 2019;11(5)
    1. Berg K., Pedersen T.R., Sandvik L., Bragadóttir R. Comparison of ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration according to LUCAS treat-and-extend protocol. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(1):146–152.
    1. Busbee B.G., Ho A.C., Brown D.M., et al. Twelve-month efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg ranibizumab in patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(5):1046–1056.
    1. Skelly A., Bezlyak V., Liew G., et al. Treat and extend treatment interval patterns with anti-VEGF therapy in nAMD patients. Vision (Basel) 2019;3(3):41.
    1. Wykoff C.C., Croft D.E., Brown D.M., et al. Prospective trial of treat-and-extend versus monthly dosing for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: TREX-AMD 1-year results. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(12):2514–2522.
    1. Wykoff C.C., Ou W.C., Brown D.M., et al. Randomized trial of treat-and-extend versus monthly dosing for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 2-year results of the TREX-AMD study. Ophthalmol Retina. 2017;1(4):314–321.
    1. Ho A.C., Busbee B.G., Regillo C.D., et al. Twenty-four-month efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg ranibizumab in patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:2181–2192.
    1. Augsburger M., Sarra G.-M., Imesch P. Treat and extend versus pro re nata regimens of ranibizumab and aflibercept in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257(9):1889–1895.
    1. Kertes P.J., Galic I.J., Greve M., et al. Efficacy of a treat-and-extend regimen with ranibizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020;138(3):244–250.
    1. Freund K.B., Korobelnik J.-F., Devenyi R., et al. Treat-and-extend regimens with anti-VEGF agents in retinal diseases: a literature review and consensus recommendations. Retina. 2015;35(8):1489–1506.
    1. Ohji M., Takahashi K., Okada A.A., et al. Efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept treat-and-extend regimens in exudative age-related macular degeneration: 52- and 96-week findings from ALTAIR: a randomized controlled trial. Adv Ther. 2020;37(3):1173–1187.
    1. Ohji M., Lanzetta P., Korobelnik J.F., et al. Efficacy and treatment burden of intravitreal aflibercept versus intravitreal ranibizumab treat-and-extend regimens at 2 years: network meta-analysis incorporating individual patient data meta-regression and matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Adv Ther. 2020;37(5):2184–2198.
    1. Silva R., Berta A., Larsen M., et al. Treat-and-extend versus monthly regimen in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results with ranibizumab from the TREND study. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(1):57–65.
    1. Gillies M.C., Hunyor A.P., Arnold J.J., et al. Effect of ranibizumab and aflibercept on best-corrected visual acuity in treat-and-extend for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019;137(4):372–379.
    1. American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern Retina/Vitreous Committee Age-related macular degeneration Preferred Practice Pattern® 2019. 2019. Available at: Accessed 28.04.21.
    1. Vardarinos A., Gupta N., Janjua R., et al. 24-month clinical outcomes of a treat-and-extend regimen with ranibizumab for wet age-related macular degeneration in a real life setting. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17:58.
    1. Keane P.A., Liakopoulos S., Chang K.T., et al. Relationship between optical coherence tomography retinal parameters and visual acuity in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(12):2206–2214.
    1. Gao S.S., Liu L., Bailey S.T., et al. Quantification of choroidal neovascularization vessel length using optical coherence tomography angiography. J Biomed Opt. 2016;21(7):76010.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel