The potential significance of binovular follicles and binucleate giant oocytes for the development of genetic abnormalities

Bernd Rosenbusch, Bernd Rosenbusch

Abstract

Normal development of a fertilizable female gamete emanates from a follicle containing only one oocyte that becomes haploid after first meiotic division. Binovular follicles including two oocytes and binucleate giant oocytes that are diploid after first meiosis constitute notable exceptions from this rule. Data provided by programmes of human-assisted reproduction on the occurrence of both phenomena have been reviewed to evaluate possible implications for the formation of genetic abnormalities. To exclude confusion with oocytes aspirated from two adjacent individual follicles, true binovularity has been defined as inclusion of two oocytes within a common zona pellucida or their fusion in the zonal region. A total of 18 conjoined oocytes have been reported and one of the oocyte was normally fertilized in seven cases. Simultaneous fertilization of both female gametes occurred only once. No pregnancy was achieved after transfer of an embryo from a binovular follicle. Binucleate giant oocytes have been observed sporadically but a few reports suggest an incidence of up to 0.3% of all gametes retrieved. Extensive studies performed by two independent centres demonstrated that giant oocytes are diploid at metaphase II, can undergo fertilization in vitro with formation of two or three pronuclei and develop into triploid zygotes and triploid or triploid/mosaic embryos. In summary, giant binucleate oocytes may be responsible for the development of digynic triploidy whereas the currently available data do not support a role of conjoined oocytes in producing dizygotic twins, mosaicism, chimaeras or tetraploidy. However, more information on the maturity and fertilizability of oocytes from binovular follicles is needed. Future studies should also evaluate a possible impact of pharmaceutical and environmental oestrogens on the formation of multiovular follicles.

References

    1. Annu Rev Med. 1968;19:351-72
    1. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999 Aug;16(7):355-7
    1. Fertil Steril. 1990 Nov;54(5):869-72
    1. Hum Reprod. 1994 Mar;9(3):506-10
    1. Hum Reprod. 2002 Sep;17(9):2388-93
    1. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2012;53(1):189-92
    1. J Cell Comp Physiol. 1960 Nov;56(Suppl 1):1-15
    1. Biol Reprod. 1990 Sep;43(3):478-84
    1. Fertil Steril. 1983 Dec;40(6):841-3
    1. Reprod Toxicol. 2011 Nov;32(3):304-12
    1. Fertil Steril. 1989 Aug;52(2):325-7
    1. Reprod Toxicol. 2010 Dec;30(4):550-7
    1. J Reprod Fertil. 1988 Jan;82(1):15-25
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977 May 1;128(1):6-12
    1. Int J Surg Pathol. 2001 Apr;9(2):121-5
    1. Lancet. 1969 Apr 12;1(7598):754-5
    1. Hum Reprod. 2009 Jun;24(6):1255-66
    1. Fertil Steril. 2011 Feb;95(2):573-6
    1. Hum Reprod. 2006 Mar;21(3):735-7
    1. Fertil Steril. 1981 Oct;36(4):539
    1. Fertil Steril. 2008 Jul;90(1):49-55
    1. Fertil Steril. 1990 Nov;54(5):947-9
    1. Fertil Steril. 1981 Apr;35(4):417-22
    1. Fertil Steril. 2010 Nov;94(6):2479-81
    1. Anat Rec. 1960 Aug;137:521-4
    1. Anat Rec. 1962 Aug;143:345-9
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Jun;66(6):1807-20
    1. Fertil Steril. 1987 Apr;47(4):707-9
    1. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2010 Jun;38(6):395-7
    1. Anat Rec. 1964 Jan;148:115-9
    1. Fertil Steril. 2009 Sep;92(3):897-903
    1. Theriogenology. 2008 May;69(8):977-82
    1. Anat Histol Embryol. 2009 Jun;38(3):233-9
    1. Fertil Steril. 1988 Mar;49(3):483-6
    1. Hum Reprod. 2002 Sep;17(9):2394-401
    1. Fertil Steril. 2009 Jul;92(1):394.e5-8
    1. Pediatr Pathol. 1988;8(3):283-92
    1. Anat Rec. 1962 Jan;142:25-9
    1. Am J Anat. 1975 Feb;142(2):233-63
    1. J Reprod Fertil. 1987 Sep;81(1):137-47
    1. Fertil Steril. 2011 Oct;96(4):951-6
    1. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004;107(1-2):128-31
    1. Fertil Steril. 1978 Mar;29(3):342-50
    1. Hum Reprod. 1998 Sep;13(9):2575-8
    1. Arch Gynakol. 1975 Jul 29;218(3):189-201
    1. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1980;28(3):158-68
    1. Semin Reprod Med. 2006 Jul;24(3):134-41

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel