Efficacy and Safety of ABT-494, a Selective JAK-1 Inhibitor, in a Phase IIb Study in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate

Mark C Genovese, Josef S Smolen, Michael E Weinblatt, Gerd R Burmester, Sebastian Meerwein, Heidi S Camp, Li Wang, Ahmed A Othman, Nasser Khan, Aileen L Pangan, Steven Jungerwirth, Mark C Genovese, Josef S Smolen, Michael E Weinblatt, Gerd R Burmester, Sebastian Meerwein, Heidi S Camp, Li Wang, Ahmed A Othman, Nasser Khan, Aileen L Pangan, Steven Jungerwirth

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ABT-494, a selective JAK-1 inhibitor, in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX).

Methods: Three hundred RA patients receiving stable doses of MTX were randomly assigned equally to receive immediate-release ABT-494 at 3, 6, 12, or 18 mg twice daily, 24 mg once daily, or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (achieving an ACR20 response) at week 12, as determined using the last observation carried forward method.

Results: At week 12, the proportion of ACR20 responses was higher with ABT-494 (62%, 68%, 80%, 64%, and 76% for the 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 mg doses, respectively) than with placebo (46%) (using nonresponder imputation) (P < 0.05 for the 6, 12, and 24 mg doses). There was a significant dose-response relationship among all ABT-494 doses (P < 0.001). The proportions of patients achieving ACR50 and ACR70 responses were significantly higher for all ABT-494 doses (except the 12 mg dose for the ACR70 response) than for placebo, as were changes in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the C-reactive protein level (DAS28-CRP). Rapid improvement was demonstrated by significant differences in ACR20 response rates and changes in the DAS28-CRP for all doses compared with placebo at week 2 (the first postbaseline visit). The incidence of adverse events was similar across groups; most were mild, and infections were the most frequent. One serious infection (community-acquired pneumonia) occurred with ABT-494 at 12 mg. There were dose-dependent increases in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, but the LDL cholesterol:HDL cholesterol ratios were unchanged through week 12. Mean hemoglobin levels remained stable at lower doses, but decreases were observed at higher doses.

Conclusion: This study evaluated a broad range of doses of ABT-494 in RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX. ABT-494 demonstrated efficacy, with a safety and tolerability profile similar to that of other JAK inhibitors.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02066389.

© 2016 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Rheumatology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis meeting the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20), 50% improvement, and 70% improvement at week 12 of treatment with ABT‐494 (modified intent‐to‐treat population; nonresponder imputation analysis). † = The sensitivity analysis for correction of affected high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein samples demonstrated that there was a potential shift of 1 patient from responder to nonresponder in the placebo arm for ACR50 response (from 18% down to 16%). ∗ = P < 0.05; ∗∗ = P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ = P < 0.001 versus placebo. BID = twice daily; QD = once daily.
Figure 2
Figure 2
AC, Proportions of patients achieving ACR20 responses (A), ACR50 responses (B), and ACR70 responses (C) over 12 weeks (modified intent‐to‐treat [ITT] population; nonresponder imputation [NRI] analysis). D, Mean change in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the C‐reactive protein level (DAS28‐CRP) from baseline through 12 weeks (modified ITT population; observed patients). E and F, Proportion of patients achieving a DAS28‐CRP of ≤3.2 or <2.6 (E) or low disease activity or clinical remission based on Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) criteria (CDAI score ≤10 indicates low disease activity; CDAI score ≤2.8 indicates clinical remission) (F) at week 12 of treatment with ABT‐494 (modified ITT population; NRI analysis). ∗ = P < 0.05; ∗∗ = P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ = P < 0.001 versus placebo. See Figure 1 for other definitions.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A, Mean hemoglobin levels over 12 weeks in all patients. B, Mean change in hemoglobin levels from baseline over 12 weeks in patients with high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein levels of >5 mg/liter at baseline. The normal range for hemoglobin is 13.2–17.0 gm/dl in males and 11.5–15.5 gm/dl in females. Shown are observed data from the safety population. See Figure 1 for definitions.

References

    1. McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2011;365:2205–19.
    1. Stark GR, Darnell JE Jr. The JAK‐STAT pathway at twenty. Immunity 2012;36:503–14.
    1. O'Shea JJ, Kontzias A, Yamaoka K, Tanaka Y, Laurence A. Janus kinase inhibitors in autoimmune diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72 Suppl 2:ii111–5.
    1. Lee EB, Fleischmann R, Hall S, Wilkinson B, Bradley JD, Gruben D, et al. Tofacitinib versus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2014;370:2377–86.
    1. Burmester GR, Blanco R, Charles‐Schoeman C, Wollenhaupt J, Zerbini C, Benda B, et al. Tofacitinib (CP‐690,550) in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet 2013;381:451–60.
    1. Kremer J, Li ZG, Hall S, Fleischmann R, Genovese M, Martin‐Mola E, et al. Tofacitinib in combination with nonbiologic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:253–61.
    1. Fleischmann R, Kremer J, Cush J, Schulze‐Koops H, Connell CA, Bradley JD, et al. Placebo‐controlled trial of tofacitinib monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2012;367:495–507.
    1. Genovese M, Kremer J, Zamani O, Ludivico C, Krogulec M, Xie L, et al. Baricitinib in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1243–52.
    1. Keystone EC, Taylor PC, Drescher E, Schlichting DE, Beattie SD, Berclaz PY, et al. Safety and efficacy of baricitinib at 24 weeks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to methotrexate. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:333–40.
    1. Graff C, Schwartz A, Voss JW, Wishart N, Olson L, George J, et al. Characterization of ABT‐494, a second generation Jak1 selective inhibitor [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2014;66 Suppl 10:S659–60.
    1. Voss J, Graff C, Schwartz A, Hyland D, Argiriadi M, Camp H, et al. Pharmacodynamics of a novel Jak1 selective inhibitor in rat arthritis and anemia models and in healthy human subjects [abstract]. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73 Suppl 2:222.
    1. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31:315–24.
    1. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO III, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:2569–81.
    1. Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, Bombardier C, Furst D, Goldsmith C, et al. American College of Rheumatology preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38:727–35.
    1. Prevoo ML, van 't Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty‐eight–joint counts: development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38:44–8.
    1. Aletaha D, Nell VP, Stamm T, Uffmann M, Pflugbeil S, Machold K, et al. Acute phase reactants add little to composite disease activity indices for rheumatoid arthritis: validation of a clinical activity score. Arthritis Res Ther 2005;7:R796–806.
    1. Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, Bombardier C, Chernoff M, Fried B, et al. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum 1993;36:729–40.
    1. Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23:137–45.
    1. Strand V, Balbir‐Gurman A, Pavelka K, Emery P, Li N, Yin M, et al. Sustained benefit in rheumatoid arthritis following one course of rituximab: improvements in physical function over 2 years. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006;45:1505–13.
    1. Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Schiff MH, Kalden JR, Emery P, Eberl G, et al. A Simplified Disease Activity Index for rheumatoid arthritis for use in clinical practice. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003;42:244–57.
    1. Woodworth T, Furst DE, Alten R, Bingham CO III, Yocum D, Sloan V, et al. Standardizing assessment and reporting of adverse effects in rheumatology clinical trials II: the Rheumatology Common Toxicity Criteria v.2.0. J Rheumatol 2007;34:1401–14.
    1. Kremer JM, Emery P, Camp HS, Friedman A, Wang L, Othman AA, et al. A phase IIb study of ABT‐494, a selective JAK‐1 inhibitor, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016;68:2867–77.
    1. Smolen JS, Beaulieu A, Rubbert‐Roth A, Ramos‐Remus C, Rovensky J, Alecock E, et al. Effect of interleukin‐6 receptor inhibition with tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (OPTION study): a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, randomised trial. Lancet 2008;371:987–97.
    1. Schiff MH, Kremer JM, Jahreis A, Vernon E, Isaacs JD, van Vollenhoven RF. Integrated safety in tocilizumab clinical trials. Arthritis Res Ther 2011;13:R141.
    1. Raj DS. Role of interleukin‐6 in the anemia of chronic disease. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2009;38:382–8.
    1. Isaacs JD, Harari O, Kobold U, Lee JS, Bernasconi C. Effect of tocilizumab on haematological markers implicates interleukin‐6 signalling in the anaemia of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2013;15:R204.
    1. Van Vollenhoven RF, Tanaka T, Lamba M, Collinge M, Hendrikx T, Hirose T, et al. Relationship between NK cell count and important safety events in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with Tofacitinib [abstract]. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74 Suppl 2:258–9.
    1. Emery P, McInnes I, Genovese M, Smolen J, Kremer J, Dougados M, et al. Characterisation of changes in lymphocyte subsets in baricitinib‐treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis in two phase 3 studies [abstract]. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75 Suppl 1:A62.
    1. Kivitz A, Zubrzycka‐Sienkiewicz A, Gutierrez‐Urena S, Poiley J, Kristy R, Shay K, et al. A phase 2b, randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group, placebo‐controlled, dose‐finding, multi‐center study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ASP015K in moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis subjects who have had an inadequate response to methotrexate [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014;66 Suppl:S421.
    1. Huizinga TW, Fleischmann RM, Jasson M, Radin AR, van Adelsberg J, Fiore S, et al. Sarilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against IL‐6Rα in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: efficacy and safety results from the randomised SARIL‐RA‐MOBILITY part A trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1626–34.
    1. Westhovens R, Alten R, Pavlova D, Enriquez‐Soza F, Mazur M, Greenwald M, et al. Filgotinib (GLPG0634), an oral JAK1 selective inhibitor is effective in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results from a phase 2B dose ranging study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015;67 Suppl 10 URL: .

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel