Toxicity of cigarette butts, and their chemical components, to marine and freshwater fish

Elli Slaughter, Richard M Gersberg, Kayo Watanabe, John Rudolph, Chris Stransky, Thomas E Novotny, Elli Slaughter, Richard M Gersberg, Kayo Watanabe, John Rudolph, Chris Stransky, Thomas E Novotny

Abstract

Background: Cigarette butts are the most common form of litter, as an estimated 4.5 trillion cigarette butts are thrown away every year worldwide. Many chemical products are used during the course of growing tobacco and manufacturing cigarettes, the residues of which may be found in cigarettes prepared for consumption. Additionally, over 4000 chemicals may also be introduced to the environment via cigarette particulate matter (tar) and mainstream smoke.

Methods: Using US Environmental Protection Agency standard acute fish bioassays, cigarette butt-derived leachate was analysed for aquatic toxicity. Survival was the single endpoint and data were analysed using Comprehensive Environmental Toxicity Information System to identify the LC50 of cigarette butt leachate to fish.

Results: The LC50 for leachate from smoked cigarette butts (smoked filter + tobacco) was approximately one cigarette butt/l for both the marine topsmelt (Atherinops affinis) and the freshwater fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Leachate from smoked cigarette filters (no tobacco), was less toxic, with LC50 values of 1.8 and 4.3 cigarette butts/l, respectively for both fish species. Unsmoked cigarette filters (no tobacco) were also found to be toxic, with LC50 values of 5.1 and 13.5 cigarette butts/l, respectively, for both fish species.

Conclusion: Toxicity of cigarette butt leachate was found to increase from unsmoked cigarette filters (no tobacco) to smoked cigarette filters (no tobacco) to smoked cigarette butts (smoked filter + tobacco). This study represents the first in the literature to investigate and affirm the toxicity of cigarette butts to fish, and will assist in assessing the potential ecological risks of cigarette butts to the aquatic environment.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Concentration-response curves for topsmelt (Atherinops affinis). LC50 values for leachate from smoked cigarette butts (SCB) (smoked filter + tobacco), smoked cigarette filters (SF) (no tobacco) and unsmoked cigarette filters (USF) (no tobacco) were determined to be 1.1, 1.8 and 5.1 cigarette butts/l, respectively. Survival in all laboratory controls exceeded 90%. Error bars represent one SE of the mean. Dose-response curves are significantly (p<0.05) different.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Concentration-response curves for the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). LC50 values for leachate from smoked cigarette butts (SCB) (smoked filter + tobacco), smoked cigarette filters (SF) (no tobacco) and unsmoked cigarette filters (USF) (no tobacco) were determined to be 0.97, 4.3, and 13.5 cigarette butts/l, respectively. Survival in all laboratory controls exceeded 90%. Error bars represent one SE of the mean. Dose-response curves are significantly (p<0.05) different.

References

    1. Novotny TE, Lum K, Smith E, et al. Cigarettes butts and the case for an environmental policy on hazardous cigarette waste. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009;6:1691–705
    1. Register K. Cigarette butts as litter-toxic as well as ugly? Bull Am Litt Soc 2000;25:23–9
    1. Sheets TJ. Pesticide residues on tobacco: Perceptions and realities. Rec Adv Tobacco Sci 1991;17:33–70
    1. Hoffmann D, Hoffmann I. The changing cigarette, 1950–1995. J Toxicol Environ Health 1997;50:307–64
    1. Glantz SA, Slade J, Bero LA, et al. The Cigarette Papers. Berkley, CA: University of California Press, 1996:202–35
    1. Moriwaki H, Kitajima S, Katahira K. Waste on the roadside, ‘poi-sute’ waste: its distribution and elution potential of pollutants into environment. Waste Manag 2009;29:1192–7
    1. Warne MStJ, Patra RW, Cole B, et al. Toxicity and a Hazard Assessment of Cigarette Butts to Aquatic Organisms [abstract]. Interact 2002-Programme and Abstract Book. Sydney: The Royal Australian Society Chemical Institute, The Australasian Society of Ecotoxicology and The International Chemometrics Society, 2002:192
    1. Micevska T, Warne MStJ, Pablo F, et al. Variation in, and causes of, toxicity of cigarette butts to a cladoceran and microtox. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 2006;50:205–12
    1. United States Environmental Protection Agency Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms. 5th edn Washington, DC: US EPA, 2002. EPA 821/R-02/012.
    1. Hamilton MA, Russo RC, Thurston RV. Trimmed Spearman-Karber method for estimating median lethal concentrations in toxicity bioassays. Environ Sci Technol 1977;11:714–19
    1. Motulsky H, Christopoulos A. Fitting Models to Biological Data Using Linear and Nonlinear Regression. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003:134–59
    1. Konar SK. Toxicity of nicotine to aquatic life. Indiana J Fish 1977;24:124–8
    1. United States Government Accountability Office Pesticides on Tobacco. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2003
    1. Dane AJ, Crystal DH, Kent JV. The detection of nitro pesticides in mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke using electron monochromator-mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2006;78:3227–33
    1. Rodgman A, Perfetti TA. The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2008:933
    1. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company Cigarette Ingredients: A Complete List and Background. Winston-Salem, NC: R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, 1994. (accessed 20 Dec 2010).
    1. Triest FJ. Smokers' flavor concepts evolving as additives' importance increases. Tob Int 1979;181:20–1
    1. Clark TJ, Bunch JE. Quantitative determination of phenols in mainstream smoke with solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatographic-selected ion monitoring mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr Sci 1996;34:272–5
    1. Hazardous Substances Data Bank. 4-Ethylphenol. Toxnet, National Library of Medicine; (accessed 20 Dec 2010).
    1. Doull J, Frawley JP, George W. List of Ingredients Added to Tobacco in the Manufacture of Cigarettes by Six Major American Cigarette Companies. Washington, DC: Covington and Burling, 1994
    1. United States Department of Health and Human Services Reducing the Health Consequences of Smoking: 25 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General. DHHS Publication No. (CDC) 89–8411. Rockville, MD: Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, Office on Smoking and Health, 1989
    1. Norman A. Cigarette manufacture: cigarette design and materials. In: Davis DL, Nielsen MT, eds. Tobacco: Production, Chemistry and Technology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science, 1999:353–87
    1. Pauly JL, Mapani AB, Lesses JD, et al. Cigarettes with defective filters marketed for 40 years: what Philip Morris never told smokers. Tob Control 2002;11:i51–61
    1. Iskander FY. Neutron activation analysis of an Egyptian cigarette and its ash. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 1985;89:511–18

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel