Evaluation of Two Dosing Regimens for Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma: Results From the Phase IIIb/IV CheckMate 511 Trial

Celeste Lebbé, Nicolas Meyer, Laurent Mortier, Ivan Marquez-Rodas, Caroline Robert, Piotr Rutkowski, Alexander M Menzies, Thomas Eigentler, Paolo A Ascierto, Michael Smylie, Dirk Schadendorf, Mazhar Ajaz, Inge Marie Svane, Rene Gonzalez, Linda Rollin, Jennifer Lord-Bessen, Abdel Saci, Elena Grigoryeva, Jacopo Pigozzo, Celeste Lebbé, Nicolas Meyer, Laurent Mortier, Ivan Marquez-Rodas, Caroline Robert, Piotr Rutkowski, Alexander M Menzies, Thomas Eigentler, Paolo A Ascierto, Michael Smylie, Dirk Schadendorf, Mazhar Ajaz, Inge Marie Svane, Rene Gonzalez, Linda Rollin, Jennifer Lord-Bessen, Abdel Saci, Elena Grigoryeva, Jacopo Pigozzo

Abstract

Purpose: Nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (NIVO1+IPI3) is approved for first-line treatment of patients with advanced melanoma in several countries. We conducted a phase IIIb/IV study (CheckMate 511) to determine if nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg (NIVO3+IPI1) improves the safety profile of the combination.

Patients and methods: Patients (N = 360) age 18 years or older with previously untreated, unresectable stage III or IV melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1 to NIVO3+IPI1 or NIVO1+IPI3 once every 3 weeks for four doses. After 6 weeks, all patients received NIVO 480 mg once every 4 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was a comparison of the incidence of treatment-related grade 3 to 5 adverse events (AEs) between groups. Secondary end points included descriptive analyses of objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The study was not designed to formally demonstrate noninferiority of NIVO3+IPI1 to NIVO1+IPI3 for efficacy end points.

Results: At a minimum follow-up of 12 months, incidence of treatment-related grade 3 to 5 AEs was 34% with NIVO3+IPI1 versus 48% with NIVO1+IPI3 ( P = .006). In descriptive analyses, objective response rate was 45.6% in the NIVO3+IPI1 group and 50.6% in the NIVO1+IPI3 group, with complete responses in 15.0% and 13.5% of patients, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 9.9 months in the NIVO3+IPI1 group and 8.9 months in the NIVO1+IPI3 group. Median overall survival was not reached in either group.

Conclusion: The CheckMate 511 study met its primary end point, demonstrating a significantly lower incidence of treatment-related grade 3-5 AEs with NIVO3+IPI1 versus NIVO1+IPI3. Descriptive analyses showed that there were no meaningful differences between the groups for any efficacy end point, although longer follow up may help to better characterize efficacy outcomes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02714218.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
CONSORT diagram. Patient disposition as of June 1, 2018.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Kaplan-Meier plot of (A) progression-free survival (PFS) and (B) overall survival (OS) in patients who received NIVO3+IPI1 (nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg) or NIVO1+IPI3 (nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg). Symbols indicate censored observations. Median PFS was 9.92 months in the NIVO3+IPI1 group and 8.94 months in the NIVO1+IPI3 group (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.42). Median OS was not reached in either group (hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.62).

References

    1. Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:23–34.
    1. Wolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Overall survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1345–1356.
    1. Hellmann MD, Ciuleanu TE, Pluzanski A, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in lung cancer with a high tumor mutational burden. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2093–2104.
    1. Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1277–1290.
    1. Janjigian YY, Bendell J, Calvo E, et al. CheckMate-032 study: Efficacy and safety of nivolumab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with esophagogastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:2836–2844.
    1. Wolchok JD, Kluger H, Callahan MK, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:122–133.
    1. Callahan MK, Kluger H, Postow MA, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma: Updated survival, response, and safety data in a phase I dose-escalation study. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:391–398.
    1. Postow MA, Chesney J, Pavlick AC, et al. Nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2006–2017.
    1. Hodi FS, Chesney J, Pavlick AC, et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma: 2-year overall survival outcomes in a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1558–1568.
    1. Hodi FS, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone in advanced melanoma (CheckMate 067): 4-year outcomes of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:1480–1492.
    1. Schadendorf D, Larkin J, Wolchok J, et al. Health-related quality of life results from the phase III CheckMate 067 study. Eur J Cancer. 2017;82:80–91.
    1. Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, et al. Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:139–144.
    1. Pickard AS, Neary MP, Cella D. Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:70.
    1. Schadendorf D, Wolchok JD, Hodi FS, et al. Efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma who discontinued treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab because of adverse events: A pooled analysis of randomized phase II and III trials. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3807–3814.
    1. Wang DY, Salem JE, Cohen JV, et al. Fatal toxic effects associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:1721–1728.
    1. Blank CU, Rozeman EA, Menzies AM, et al. OpACIN-neo: A multicenter phase II study to identify the optimal neo-adjuvant combination scheme of ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO) Ann Oncol. 2018;29 suppl 8; abstr LBA42.
    1. Long GV, Atkinson V, Lo S, et al. Combination nivolumab and ipilimumab or nivolumab alone in melanoma brain metastases: A multicentre randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:672–681.
    1. Tawbi HA, Forsyth PA, Algazi A, et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in melanoma metastatic to the brain. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:722–730.
    1. D’Angelo SP, Larkin J, Sosman JA, et al. Efficacy and safety of nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab in patients with mucosal melanoma: A pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:226–235.
    1. Bristol-Myers Squibb Data sharing request process.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel