Safety and immunogenicity of a QazCovid-in® inactivated whole-virion vaccine against COVID-19 in healthy adults: A single-centre, randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 and an open-label phase 2 clinical trials with a 6 months follow-up in Kazakhstan

Kunsulu Zakarya, Lespek Kutumbetov, Mukhit Orynbayev, Yergali Abduraimov, Kulyaisan Sultankulova, Markhabat Kassenov, Gulbanu Sarsenbayeva, Ilyas Kulmagambetov, Timur Davlyatshin, Maria Sergeeva, Marina Stukova, Berik Khairullin, Kunsulu Zakarya, Lespek Kutumbetov, Mukhit Orynbayev, Yergali Abduraimov, Kulyaisan Sultankulova, Markhabat Kassenov, Gulbanu Sarsenbayeva, Ilyas Kulmagambetov, Timur Davlyatshin, Maria Sergeeva, Marina Stukova, Berik Khairullin

Abstract

Background: A new inactivated whole-virion QazCovid-in® vaccine against COVID-19 was developed from SARS-CoV-2 isolated in Kazakhstan, inactivated by formaldehyde, and adjuvanted with aluminium hydroxide. Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials aimed at assessing the vaccine's safety, immunogenicity, and the duration of immunity induced by the QazCovid-in® vaccine after one or two immunisations.

Methods: From 23.09.2020 to 19.03.2021 we performed a randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 clinical trial and from 18.10.2020 to 17.04.2021 an open-label phase 2 clinical trials of the QazCovid-in® vaccine with a 6 months follow-up at a single centre in Almaty, the Republic of Kazakhstan. Eligible healthy adults aged 18 years and older with no history of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were randomly assigned to the treatment groups using a computerised randomisation scheme generator. In the phase 1 clinical trial, two doses of the vaccine (5 μg each) or placebo (0·9% NaCl) were administered intramuscularly to 44 subjects aged 18-50 years, 21 days apart. In the phase 2 trial, 200 healthy participants were randomised into four equal-sized groups according to the age (18-49 or ≥50 years) and either single (day 1) or double (day 1 and 21) vaccination protocol. The primary outcomes were safety and tolerability. The secondary outcome was immunogenicity. The cellular response was measured by a whole-blood cytokine release assay (phase 1 only). The trials were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04530357.

Findings: The QazCovid-in® vaccine was safe and well-tolerated and induced predominantly mild adverse events; no serious or severe adverse events were recorded in both trials. In the phase 1 trial, the percentage of subjects with a fourfold increase of antibody titres (sero conversion) in MNA was 59% after one vaccine dose and amounted to 100% after two doses. Neutralizing antibody titres reached the geometric mean titre (GMT) of 100 after administration of two doses. A statistically significant increase in the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines after vaccination indicated the Th1-biased response. On day 180, 40% of placebo-treated subjects demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the levels of antibodies measured by both ELISA and MNA, which suggests the infection with SARS-CoV-2. In the phase 2 trial, 100% of subjects aged 18-49 years seroconverted for SARS-CoV-2 on day 21 after the first dose, as indicated by MNA yielding the GMTs of 32 or 30 in the one- and two-dose groups, respectively. Amongst ≥50-year-old subjects, the number of sero conversions in the two- and one-dose groups on day 21 was 94% and 92% with the respective GMTs of 25 and 24. After the second dose, the sero conversion rate reached 100%; however, the GMT was significantly lower when compared with the corresponding value measured in subjects aged 18-49 years (83 vs 143). In both trials, specific antibodies were detected in MNA and ELISA on study day 180, but the titres dropped in comparison to day 42. The results of this study serve as the rationale for the phase 3 study.

Interpretation: The QazCovid-in® vaccine is safe and well-tolerated and promotes pronounced humoral immunity which lasts for at least 6 months after double intramuscular immunisation.

Funding: The work was funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan within the framework of the Scientific and Technical Program "Development of a vaccine against coronavirus infection COVID-1900 . State registration number ?.0927.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no competing interests.

© 2021 The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trial profile for phase 1 (A) and phase 2 (B).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cytokine profiles in placebo and vaccine groups Individual values for each subject are shown as small closed circles. Open circles with error bars represent geometric mean with 95% CI for each time point. All concentrations are presented as pg/mL after the background subtraction. Groups were compared by two-way RM-ANOVA (applied to the log10 values), followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparison test; * p < 0·05, *** p–0·001, and **** p–0·0001- indicate statistically significant differences between groups is.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Humoral immune response in phase 2 (ELISA results) Fold change in serum Spike-specific antibody titres measured on days 21 and 27 (after the first vaccination), and on days 42 and 180 (after the second vaccination) in comparison to day 1 (before vaccination) are shown. Individual values for each subject are shown as circles. Grey bars with errors indicate geometric means with 95% CIs. The horizontal dotted line represents the 100-fold increase threshold as per the study protocol.

References

    1. World Health Organization. Available at: (accessed March 2, 2021).
    1. Wu Z., McGoogan J.M. Characteristics of and important lessons from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: summary of a Report of 72314 cases from the Chinese Center for disease control and prevention. JAMA. 2020;323(13):1239–1242.
    1. Undurraga E.A., Chowell G., Mizumoto K. COVID-19 case fatality risk by age and gender in a high testing setting in Latin America: chile, March-August 2020. Infect Dis Poverty. 2021;10(1):11.
    1. Logunov D.Y., Dolzhikova I.V., Shcheblyakov D.V. Safety and efficacy of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine: an interim analysis of a randomized controlled phase 3 trial in Russia. Lancet. 2021;396(10255):887–897.
    1. Voysey M., Clemens S.A.C., Madhi S.A. Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomized controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK. Lancet. 2021;397(10269):99–111.
    1. Baden L.R., El Sahly H.M., Essink B. Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(5):403–416.
    1. Polack F.P., Thomas S.J., Kitchin N. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(27):2603–2615.
    1. Xia S., Duan K., Zhang Y. Effect of an Inactivated Vaccine Against SARS-CoV-2 on Safety and Immunogenicity Outcomes: interim Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA. 2020;324(10):951–960.
    1. Khairkhah N., Aghasadeghi M.R., Namvar A., Bolhassani A. Design of novel multi-epitope constructs-based peptide vaccine against the structural S, N and M proteins of human COVID-19 using immuno-informatics analysis. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(10)
    1. Zhang Y., Zeng G., Pan H. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18-59 years: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21(2):181–192.
    1. Petrone L., Petruccioli E., Vanini V. A whole blood test to measure SARS-CoV-2-specific response in COVID-19 patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021;27(2) 286 e7- e13.
    1. Castells M.C., Phillips E.J. Maintaining Safety with SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(7):643–649.
    1. Blumenthal K.G., Robinson L.B., Camargo C.A., Jr. Acute allergic reactions to mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines. JAMA. 2021
    1. Hunter C.A., Jones S.A. IL-6 as a keystone cytokine in health and disease. Nat Immunol. 2015;16(5):448–457.
    1. Oran D.P., Topol E.J. Prevalence of Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection: a narrative review. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173(5):362–367.
    1. Wang X., Guo X., Xin Q. Neutralizing antibodies responses to SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 inpatients and convalescent patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2020
    1. Logunov D.Y., Dolzhikova I.V., Zubkova O.V. Safety and immunogenicity of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine in two formulations: two open, non-randomiZed phase 1/2 studies from Russia. Lancet. 2020;396(10255):887–897.
    1. Dan J.M., Mateus J., Kato Y. Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 assessed for up to 8 months after infection. Science. 2021;371(6529)
    1. Xia S., Zhang Y., Wang Y. Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBIBP-CorV: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):39–51.
    1. Ella R., Reddy S., Jogdand H. Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152: interim results from a double-blind, randomized, multi-centre, phase 2 trial, and 3-month follow-up of a double-blind, randomized phase 1 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021
    1. Folegatti P.M., Ewer K.J., Aley P.K. Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a preliminary report of a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10249):467–478.
    1. Zhu F.C., Guan X.H., Li Y.H. Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18 years or older: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10249):479–488.
    1. Jackson L.A., Anderson E.J., Rouphael N.G. An mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 - preliminary report. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(20):1920–1931.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel