Three-dimensional radiofrequency tissue tightening: a proposed mechanism and applications for body contouring

Malcolm Paul, G Blugerman, M Kreindel, R S Mulholland, Malcolm Paul, G Blugerman, M Kreindel, R S Mulholland

Abstract

The use of radiofrequency energy to produce collagen matrix contraction is presented. Controlling the depth of energy delivery, the power applied, the target skin temperature, and the duration of application of energy at various soft tissue levels produces soft tissue contraction, which is measurable. This technology allows precise soft tissue modeling at multiple levels to enhance the result achieved over traditional suction-assisted lipectomy as well as other forms of energy such as ultrasonic and laser-generated lipolysis.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Ex vivo experimental setup
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic drawing of RF handpiece inserted into the body
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Temperature profile inside adipose tissue during the RFAL treatment
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Before and after RFAL and intraoperative two-point linear contraction registration points from pubic RFAL incision point to the lower pole of the umbilicus
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Adipose-septal tissue behavior during RF energy delivery at different time points
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Adipose-fibrous septal tissue thermal behavior during RF energy delivery at different time points
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Fascia contraction behavior during RF energy delivery at different time points
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Skin contraction behavior during RF energy delivery at different time points
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Normal skin histology 12 months following optimal RFAL thermal end point
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Same RFAL patient with 43% contraction and normal elastic fiber content
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Correlation between aspirated volume and linear contraction
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
Correlation between BMI and linear contraction
Fig. 13
Fig. 13
Correlation between total energy and linear contraction

References

    1. Asbell PA, Maloney RK, Davidorf J, Hersh P, McDonald M, Manche E. Conductive keratoplasty for the correction of hyperopia. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2001;99:79–87.
    1. Obrzut SL, Hecht P, Hayashi K, Fanton GS, Thabit G, III, Markel MD. The effect of radiofrequency on the length and temperature properties of the glenohumeral joint capsule. Arthroscopy. 1998;14(4):395–400. doi: 10.1016/S0749-8063(98)70007-6.
    1. Lu Y, Edwards RB, 3rd, Cole BJ, Markel MD. Thermal chondroplasty with radiofrequency energy, an in vitro comparison of bipolar and monopolar radiofrequency devices. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(1):42–49.
    1. Lu Y, Edwards RB, 3rd, Kalscheur VL, Nho S, Cole BJ, Markel MD. Effect of bipolar radiofrequency energy on human articular cartilage: comparison of confocal laser microscopy and light microscopy. Arthroscopy. 2001;17(2):117–123. doi: 10.1053/jars.2001.21903.
    1. Teruya TH, Ballard JL. New approaches for the treatment of varicose veins. Surg Clin North Am. 2004;84:1397–1417. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2004.04.008.
    1. Doshi SN, Alster TS. Combination radiofrequency and diode laser for treatment of facial rhytides and skin laxity. Cosmet Laser Ther. 2005;7:11–15. doi: 10.1080/14764170410003075.
    1. Emilia del Pino M, Rosado RH, Azuela A, Graciela Guzmán M, Argüelles D, Rodríguez C, Rosado GM. Effect of controlled volumetric tissue heating with radiofrequency on cellulite and the subcutaneous tissue of the buttocks and thighs. J Drugs Dermatol. 2006;5(8):714–722.
    1. Fatemi A, Weiss MA, Weiss RA. Short-term histologic effects of nonablative resurfacing: results with a dynamically cooled millisecond-domain 1320 nm Nd:YAG laser. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(2):172–176. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.01112.x.
    1. Mayoral FA. Skin tightening with a combined unipolar and bipolar radiofrequency device. J Drugs Dermatol. 2007;6(2):212–215.
    1. Alster TS, Doshi SN, Hopping SB. Combination surgical lifting with ablative laser skin resurfacing of facial skin: a retrospective analysis. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(9):1191–1195. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30370.x.
    1. Zelickson B, Kist D, Bernstein E, Brown DB, Ksenzenko S, Burns J, Kilmer S, Mehregan D, Pope K. Histological and ultrastructural evaluation of the effects of a radiofrequency-based nonablative dermal remodeling device: a pilot study. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140:204–209. doi: 10.1001/archderm.140.2.204.
    1. Hsu T, Kaminer M. The use of nonablative radiofrequency technology to tighten the lower face and neck. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2003;22:115–123. doi: 10.1053/sder.2003.50011.
    1. DiBernardo B (2008) The best of hot topics—lipo-transfer and SmartLipo, ASAPS, May 6, 2008
    1. Goldman A. Submental Nd:YAG laser-assisted liposuction. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;38:181–184. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20270.
    1. Kim K, Geronemus R. Laser lipolysis using a novel 1, 064 nm Nd:YAG laser. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:241–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32041.x.
    1. Paul M, Mulholland RS. A new approach for adipose tissue treatment and body contouring using radiofrequency-assisted liposuction. Aesth Plast Surg. 2009;33(5):687–694. doi: 10.1007/s00266-009-9342-z.
    1. Kenkel JM. Evaluation of skin tightening after laser-assisted liposuction, commentary. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;29(5):407–408.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel