Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of disease severity in ulcerative colitis

Mehmet Celikbilek, Serkan Dogan, Omer Ozbakır, Gökmen Zararsız, Hamit Kücük, Sebnem Gürsoy, Alper Yurci, Kadri Güven, Mehmet Yücesoy, Mehmet Celikbilek, Serkan Dogan, Omer Ozbakır, Gökmen Zararsız, Hamit Kücük, Sebnem Gürsoy, Alper Yurci, Kadri Güven, Mehmet Yücesoy

Abstract

Background: Blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (N/L) ratio is an indicator of the overall inflammatory status of the body, and an alteration in N/L ratio may be found in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. The aims of this study were to investigate the utility of N/L ratio as a simple and readily available predictor for clinical disease activity in UC.

Methods: Twenty-six patients and 28 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. The neutrophil and lymphocyte counts were recorded, and the N/L ratio was calculated from these parameters. The extent of disease classified according to the Montreal classification, clinical disease activity was evaluated using a modified Truelove-Witts severity index, and endoscopic disease activities were classified according to Schroder et al.

Results: The serum N/L ratios of active patients were significantly higher than those of inactive UC and controls (P < 0.001). The optimum N/L ratio cut-off point for active UC was 2.47. There was no significant difference between inflammation parameters, disease extension, and disease activity.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that N/L ratio is higher in patients with active UC compared with controls and UC patients in remission and a cut-off value of 2.47 can be used to identify patients with active ulcerative colitis.

Conflict of interest statement

None.

© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box‐plots to display the variation of serum N, L, and N/L ratio values between control and UC patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Comparison of ROC curves among WBC, CRP, sedimentation, and N/L ratio variables. AUC values were 0.52(0.36–0.68), 0.72(0.55–0.85), 0.64(0.48–0.79), 0.59(0.42–0.74), respectively, and there was not any significant pair wise difference for AUC values (P > 0.05). (b) Determination of the optimal cut‐off value for N/L ratio.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel