Effects of abortion legalization in Nepal, 2001-2010

Jillian T Henderson, Mahesh Puri, Maya Blum, Cynthia C Harper, Ashma Rana, Geeta Gurung, Neelam Pradhan, Kiran Regmi, Kasturi Malla, Sudha Sharma, Daniel Grossman, Lata Bajracharya, Indira Satyal, Shridhar Acharya, Prabhat Lamichhane, Philip D Darney, Jillian T Henderson, Mahesh Puri, Maya Blum, Cynthia C Harper, Ashma Rana, Geeta Gurung, Neelam Pradhan, Kiran Regmi, Kasturi Malla, Sudha Sharma, Daniel Grossman, Lata Bajracharya, Indira Satyal, Shridhar Acharya, Prabhat Lamichhane, Philip D Darney

Abstract

Background: Abortion was legalized in Nepal in 2002, following advocacy efforts highlighting high maternal mortality from unsafe abortion. We sought to assess whether legalization led to reductions in the most serious maternal health consequences of unsafe abortion.

Methods: We conducted retrospective medical chart review of all gynecological cases presenting at four large public referral hospitals in Nepal. For the years 2001-2010, all cases of spontaneous and induced abortion complications were identified, abstracted, and coded to classify cases of serious infection, injury, and systemic complications. We used segmented Poisson and ordinary logistic regression to test for trend and risks of serious complications for three time periods: before implementation (2001-2003), early implementation (2004-2006), and later implementation (2007-2010).

Results: 23,493 cases of abortion complications were identified. A significant downward trend in the proportion of serious infection, injury, and systemic complications was observed for the later implementation period, along with a decline in the risk of serious complications (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.64, 0.85). Reductions in sepsis occurred sooner, during early implementation (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.47, 0.75).

Conclusion: Over the study period, health care use and the population of reproductive aged women increased. Total fertility also declined by nearly half, despite relatively low contraceptive prevalence. Greater numbers of women likely obtained abortions and sought hospital care for complications following legalization, yet we observed a significant decline in the rate of serious abortion morbidity. The liberalization of abortion policy in Nepal has benefited women's health, and likely contributes to falling maternal mortality in the country. The steepest decline was observed after expansion of the safe abortion program to include midlevel providers, second trimester training, and medication abortion, highlighting the importance of concerted efforts to improve access. Other countries contemplating changes to abortion policy can draw on the evidence and implementation strategies observed in Nepal.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors acknowledge that author KM is employed by a commercial company in Nepal; Medicare National Hospital & Research Centre Ltd. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1. Trend in the percentage of…
Figure 1. Trend in the percentage of abortion cases with serious complications presenting at four tertiary care hospitals in Nepal, 2001–2010, N = 23,493.
Early implementation, monthly IRR from segmented Poisson regression = 1.002, p<.001 later implementation monthly irr p marginal spline test for slope change serious complications are those with infection or septic shock peritonitis endometritis severe pelvic peritoneal body temperature> = 102 F), evidence of foreign body or mechanical injury, systemic complications, such as organ failure, or death. 2002 - Passage of legal abortion legislation 2004 - First trimester services and trainings begin 2007 - Second trimester services and trainings begin 2008 - Midlevel providers trained and legally provide first trimester abortion 2009 - Medication abortion added to safe abortion program.

References

    1. Singh S (2006) Hospital admissions resulting from unsafe abortion: estimates from 13 developing countries. Lancet 368: 1887–92.
    1. Sedgh G, Singh S, Shah IH, Ahman E, Henshaw SK, et al. (2012) Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008. Lancet 379: 625–32.
    1. World Health Organization (2011) Unsafe Abortion: Global and Regional Estimates of the Incidence of Unsafe Abortion and Associated Mortality in 2008, sixth ed. Geneva: WHO.
    1. Dahal K (2004) Legal abortion in Nepal and women in prison. Lancet. 363: 1905.
    1. Thapa S (2004) Abortion law in Nepal: the road to reform. Reprod Health Matters 12: 84–94.
    1. Samandari G, Wolf M, Basnett I, Hyman A, Andersen K (2012) Implementation of legal abortion in Nepal: a model for rapid scale-up of high-quality care. Reprod Health 9: 7.
    1. Rocca CH, Puri M, Dulal B, Bajracharya L, Harper CC, et al. (2013) Unsafe abortion after legalisation in Nepal: a cross-sectional study of women presenting to hospitals. BJOG DOI:.
    1. Hussein J, Bell J, Dar Iang M, Mesko N, Amery J, et al. (2011) An Appraisal of the Maternal Mortality Decline in Nepal. PLoS One 6(5): e19898.
    1. World Health Organization (2011) Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2010, WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank estimates. Geneva: World Health Organization.
    1. Bracken MB, Freeman DH Jr, Hellenbrand K (1982) Hospitalization for medical-legal and other abortions in the United States 1970–1977. Am J Public Health 72(1): 30–7.
    1. Cates J (1982) Willard (1982) Legal Abortion: The Public Health Record. Science 215: 1586–90.
    1. Cates J, Willard, Rochat RW, Grimes DA, Tyler Jr CW (1978) Legalized abortion: effect on national trends of maternal and abortion-related mortality (1940–1976). Am J Obstet Gynecol 132: 211–4.
    1. Jewkes RK, Rees H, Dickson K, Brown H, Levin J (2005) The impact of age on the epidemiology of incomplete abortions in South Africa after legistlative change. BJOG 112: 355–9.
    1. Figà-Talamanca I, Sinnathuray TA, Yusof K, et al. (1986) Illegal abortion: an attempt to assess its cost to the health services and its incidence in the community. Int J Health Serv 16(3): 375–89.
    1. Fetters T, Vonthanak S, Picardo C, Rathavy T (2008) Abortion-related complications in Cambodia. BJOG 115(8): 957–68.
    1. Gebreselassie H, Gallo MF, Monyo A, Johnson BR (2005) The magnitude of abortion complications in Kenya. BJOG 112(9): 1229–35.
    1. World Health Organization (1987) WHO Task Force on Safety and Efficacy of Fertility Regulating Methods. Protocol for hospital-based descriptive studies of mortality, morbidity related to induced abortion. Geneva: World Health Organization.
    1. Barreto T, Campbell OMR, Davies JL, Fauveau V, Filippi VGA, et al. (1992) Investigating Induced Abortion in Developing Countries: Methods and Problems. Stud Fam Plann 23(3): 159–70.
    1. Puri M, Lamichhane P, Harken T, Blum M, Harper CC, et al. (2012) “Sometimes they used to whisper in our ears”: health care workers’ perceptions of the effects of abortion legalization in Nepal. BMC Public Health 12(1): 297.
    1. Jewkes R, Brown H, Dickson-Tetteh K, Levin J, Rees H (2002) Prevalence of morbidity associated with abortion before and after legislation in South Africa. BMJ 324: 1252–3.
    1. Sims M, Maxwell R, Bauld L, Gilmore A (2010) Short term impact of smoke-free legislation in England: retrospective analysis of hospital admissions for myocardial infarction. BMJ 340: c2161.
    1. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (1998) Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Witter S, Khadka S, Nath H, Tiwari S (2011) The national free delivery policy in Nepal: early evidence of its effects on health facilities. Health Policy Plan (Suppl. 2): ii84–ii91.
    1. Dhakal S (2007) Maternal mortality falls in Nepal but inequalities exist. Lancet 370: 1301.
    1. Collins S (2006) Assessing the health implications for Nepal’s ceasefire. Lancet 368: 907–8.
    1. Harris LH, Grossman D (2011) Confronting the challenge of unsafe second-trimester abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 115(1): 77–9.
    1. Lamichhane P, Harken T, Puri M, Darney PD, Blum M, et al. (2011) Sex-selective abortion in Nepal: a qualitative study of health workers’ perspectives. Womens Health Issues 21(3 Suppl): S37–41.
    1. Ministry of Health (2002) Nepal Demographic and Health Survey, 2001. Calverton, Maryland, USA: Family Health Division, Ministry of Health; New ERA; and ORC Macro.
    1. Ministry of Health and Population (2007) Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2006. Kathmandu, Nepal: Ministry of Health and Population, New ERA, and Macro International, Inc.
    1. Ministry of Health and Population (2012) Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2011. Kathmandu, Nepal: Ministry of Health and Population, New ERA, and ICF International, Claverton, Maryland.
    1. Sedgh G, Singh S, Henshaw SK, Bankole A (2011) Legal Abortion Worldwide in 2008: Levels and Recent Trends. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 43(3): 188–98.
    1. Banerjee SK, Andersen KL, Buchanan R, Warvadekar J (2012) Woman-centered research on access to safe abortion services and implications for behavioral change communication interventions: a cross-sectional study of women in Bihar and Jharkhand, India. BMC Pub Health 12: 175.
    1. Bingham A, Drake JK, Goodyear L, Gopinath CY, Kaufman A, et al. (2011) The role of interpersonal communication in preventing unsafe abortion in communities: the Dialogues for Life Project in Nepal. J Health Commun 16(3): 245–263.
    1. Grimes DA, Benson J, Singh S, Romero M, Ganatra B, et al. (2006) Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic. Lancet 368(9550): 1908–19.
    1. Ganatra B, Johnston HB (2002) Reducing abortion-related mortality in South Asia: a review of constraints and a road map for change. J Am Med Womens Assoc 57(3): 159–64.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel