Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: 2-Year Results from the Phase 3 SELECT-PsA 1 Study
Iain B McInnes, Koji Kato, Marina Magrey, Joseph F Merola, Mitsumasa Kishimoto, Derek Haaland, Liang Chen, Yuanyuan Duan, Jianzhong Liu, Ralph Lippe, Peter Wung, Iain B McInnes, Koji Kato, Marina Magrey, Joseph F Merola, Mitsumasa Kishimoto, Derek Haaland, Liang Chen, Yuanyuan Duan, Jianzhong Liu, Ralph Lippe, Peter Wung
Abstract
Introduction: Efficacy and safety of the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor upadacitinib (UPA) was evaluated in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) through week 104 of the ongoing long-term extension of the phase 3 trial SELECT-PsA 1.
Methods: Exploratory analyses of all primary and secondary endpoints (non-responder imputation and as observed for binary endpoints; mixed-effect model repeated measures and as observed for continuous endpoints), and summary of treatment-emergent adverse events, in patients receiving UPA 15 mg (UPA15) or 30 mg (UPA30) once daily, or adalimumab 40 mg (ADA) every other week, through week 104 are reported.
Results: Of 1704 patients, 25.4% discontinued the study drug by week 104. Proportions of patients achieving ≥ 20%/50%/70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20/50/70), ≥ 75%/90%/100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75/90/100), or minimal disease activity (MDA) were maintained through week 104; greater responses by nominal P value were observed with UPA15 and UPA30 versus ADA for ACR20/50/70 and MDA. Mean change from baseline in modified total Sharp/van der Heijde Score (mTSS) was similar across groups and to week 56 results. The safety profile of UPA was generally comparable to ADA and not altered from week 56 data. Rates of serious infection, herpes zoster, anemia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, and elevated creatine phosphokinase remained numerically higher with UPA15 and/or UPA30 versus ADA. Rates of malignancies excluding non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), major adverse cardiovascular events, and venous thromboembolism were similar across groups; rates of NMSC were higher with UPA versus ADA. Two deaths were reported with UPA15, one with UPA30, and one with ADA.
Conclusions: In PsA patients, efficacy responses were similar or greater with UPA15 or UPA30 versus ADA through week 104, and inhibition of radiographic progression was maintained. No new safety risks were identified with exposure to UPA through 2 years (week 104).
Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03104400.
Keywords: 2-year; Adalimumab; Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor; Non-biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (non-bDMARD); Psoriatic arthritis (PsA); SELECT-PsA 1; Safety; Upadacitinib.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Figures
References
- Poddubnyy D, Jadon DR, Van den Bosch F, et al. Axial involvement in psoriatic arthritis: an update for rheumatologists. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021;51(4):880–887. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.06.006.
- Coates LC, Kavanaugh A, Mease PJ, et al. Group for research and assessment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis 2015 treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(5):1060–1071.
- Gossec L, Baraliakos X, Kerschbaumer A, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(6):700–712. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217159.
- Noviani M, Feletar M, Nash P, et al. Choosing the right treatment for patients with psoriatic arthritis. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2020;12:1–17. doi: 10.1177/1759720X20962623.
- McInnes IB, Anderson JK, Magrey M, et al. Trial of upadacitinib and adalimumab for psoriatic arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(13):1227–1239. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022516.
- McInnes IB, Kato K, Magrey M, et al. Upadacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to non-biological therapy: 56-week data from the phase 3 SELECT-PsA 1 study. RMD Open. 2021;7(3):e001838. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001838.
- Taylor W, Gladman D, Helliwell P, et al. Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(8):2665–2673. doi: 10.1002/art.21972.
- Coates LC, Fransen J, Helliwell PS. Defining minimal disease activity in psoriatic arthritis: a proposed objective target for treatment. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(1):48–53. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.102053.
- Coates LC, Helliwell PS. Treat to target in psoriatic arthritis-evidence, target, research agenda. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2015;17(6):517. doi: 10.1007/s11926-015-0517-0.
- Dures E, Shepperd S, Mukherjee S, et al. Treat-to-target in PsA: methods and necessity. RMD Open. 2020;6(1):e001083.
- Burmester GR, Kremer JM, Van den Bosch F, et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-NEXT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10139):2503–2512. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31115-2.
- Genovese MC, Fleischmann R, Combe B, et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-BEYOND): a double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10139):2513–2524. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31116-4.
- Fleischmann R, Pangan AL, Song IH, et al. Upadacitinib versus placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a phase III, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(11):1788–1800. doi: 10.1002/art.41032.
- Smolen JS, Pangan AL, Emery P, et al. Upadacitinib as monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate (SELECT-MONOTHERAPY): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;393(10188):2303–2311. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30419-2.
- van Vollenhoven R, Takeuchi T, Pangan AL, et al. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib monotherapy in methotrexate-naive patients with moderately-to-severely active rheumatoid arthritis (SELECT-EARLY): a multicenter, multi-country, randomized, double-blind, active comparator-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72(10):1607–1620. doi: 10.1002/art.41384.
- Fleischmann R, Mysler E, Bessette L, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results through 3 years from the SELECT-COMPARE study. RMD Open. 2022;8(1):e002012. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002012.
- Cohen SB, van Vollenhoven RF, Winthrop KL, et al. Safety profile of upadacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis: integrated analysis from the SELECT phase III clinical programme. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(3):304–11.
- van der Heijde D, Song IH, Pangan AL, et al. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (SELECT-AXIS 1): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10214):2108–2117. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32534-6.
- AbbVie. RINVOQ® (upadacitinib) [Prescribing Information]. Available from: .
- Deodhar A, Ranza R, Ganz F, et al. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis and axial involvement [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72(suppl 10).
- Baraliakos X, Ranza R, Ostor A, et al. Efficacy of upadacitinib on psoriatic arthritis with axial involvement defined by investigator assessment and PRO-based criteria: results from two phase 3 studies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021;73(suppl 10).
- McInnes I, Kato K, Magrey M, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 2-year results from the phase 3 SELECT-PsA 1 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.799.
Source: PubMed