Klinikai vizsgálatok Nct

Summary
EudraCT Number:2004-000083-27
Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:GT-08
National Competent Authority:Sweden - MPA
Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
Trial Status:Completed
Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2004-07-27
Trial results View results
A. Protocol Information
A.1Member State ConcernedSweden - MPA
A.2EudraCT number2004-000083-27
A.3Full title of the trial
A randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III trial assessing the efficacy and safety of ALK Grass Tablet Phleum pratense in subjects with seasonal grass pollen induced rhinoconjunctivitis
A.3.2Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available
GT-08
A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberGT-08
A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan Information not present in EudraCT
A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
B. Sponsor Information
B.Sponsor: 1
B.1.1Name of SponsorALK-Abelló A/S
B.1.3.4CountryDenmark
B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorCommercial
B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
B.4.1Name of organisation providing support
B.4.2Country
B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
B.5.1Name of organisation
B.5.2Functional name of contact point
D. IMP Identification
D.IMP: 1
D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Information not present in EudraCT
D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
D.3 Description of the IMP
D.3.1Product nameALK Grass Tablet Phleum Pratense
D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Orodispersible tablet
D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPOromucosal use
D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
D.3.9.3Other descriptive nameAn allergen extract of Phleum pratense
D.3.10 Strength
D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
D.3.10.3Concentration number75,000
D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
The IMP is a:
D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) Yes
D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
D.8 Information on Placebo
D.8 Placebo: 1
D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboOrodispersible tablet
D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboOther use (Noncurrent)
E. General Information on the Trial
E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
Rhinoconjunctivitis
MedDRA Classification
E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
E.2 Objective of the trial
E.2.1Main objective of the trial
To evaluate the efficacy of specific immunotherapy with the 75,000 SQ-T ALK Grass tablet compared to placebo in subjects with grass pollen induced rhinoconjunctivitis, based on the rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score as well as the rhinoconjunctivitis medication score during the grass pollen season.
E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
To evaluate the efficacy of specific immunotherapy with the 75,000 SQ-T ALK Grass tablet compared to placebo in subjects with grass pollen induced rhinoconjunctivitis based on:
Rhinoconjunctivitis medication score in the grass pollen season.
Rhinoconjunctivitis symptom and medication score in the peak grass pollen season.
Rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma symptom score and medication score in the entire and peak grass pollen season.
Asthma symptom score and medication score in the entire and peak grass pollen season.
Rhinoconjunctivitis by VAS in the grass pollen season and peak grass pollen season.
QoL , Pharmacoeconomics and Number of well days in the grass pollen season
Global evaluation of rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms.
Impact of pre-seasonal treatment on rhinoconjunctivitis symptom and medication score during the entire and peak grass pollen season.
Safety and tolerability of the 75,000 SQ-T ALK Grass tablet compared to placebo.
E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study Information not present in EudraCT
E.3Principal inclusion criteria
•Male and female 18-65 years of age who have given informed consent, with the following selection criteria:
•Written informed consent obtained before entering the trial
•A clinical history of grass pollen induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis of two years or more requiring treatment during the grass pollen season
•A clinical history of severe rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (interfering with usual daily activities or sleep), which remain troublesome despite treatment with antiallergic drugs during the grass pollen season
•Positive Skin Prick Test (SPT) response (wheal diameter ≥ 3 mm) to Phleum pratense
•Positive specific IgE against Phleum pratense (≥ IgE Class 2)
•Physical examination with no clinically relevant findings
•If pre-menopausal female of childbearing potential, the subject must test negative on standard urine pregnancy test and must be willing to practice appropriate contraceptive methods for the duration of the trial
•Willingness to comply with this protocol

Adequate contraception methods include: male sterilisation by vasectomy for at least 6 months; condom + spermicide; diaphragm + spermicide; intra-uterine contraceptive device placed at least 4 weeks prior to trial drug administration); oral contraceptives (starting at least 4 weeks prior to trial drug administration); implant (e.g. Norplant - starting at least 4weeks prior to trial drug administration); depot injection of a progestogen drug (e.g. Depo-Provera - starting at least 4 weeks prior to trial drug administration)

E.4Principal exclusion criteria
•FEV1 < 70% of predicted value
•A clinical history of symptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis and/or asthma due to tree pollen or weed pollen adjacent to the start of – and potentially overlapping - the grass pollen season
•A clinical history of significant symptomatic perennial allergic rhinitis and/or asthma caused by an allergen to which the subject is regularly exposed
•A clinical history of significant recurrent acute sinusitis (defined as 2 episodes per year for the last two years all of which required antibiotic treatment) or chronic sinusitis
•At randomisation, current symptoms of, or treatment for, upper respiratory tract infection, acute sinusitis, acute otitis media or other relevant infectious process (serous otitis media is not an exclusion criterion)
•History of emergency visit or admission for asthma in the previous 12 months
•Use of an investigational drug within 30 days prior to screening
•Previous treatment by immunotherapy with grass pollen allergen or any other allergen within the previous 5 years
•History of anaphylaxis, including anaphylactic food allergy, bee venom anaphylaxis, exercise anaphylaxis or drug induced anaphylaxis
•History of angioedema
•Any of the following underlying conditions known or suspected to be present:
Cystic fibrosis, malignancy, insulin-dependent diabetes, malabsorption or malnutrition, renal or hepatic insufficiency, chronic infection, drug dependency or alcoholism
ischemic heart disease or angina requiring current daily medication or with any evidence of disease making implementation of the protocol or interpretation of the protocol results difficult or jeopardising the safety of the subject (e.g. clinically significant cardiovascular, serious immunopathologic, immunodeficiency whether acquired or not, hepatic, neurologic, psychiatric,
endocrine, or other major systemic disease)
•Immunosuppressive treatment
•History of hypersensitivity to the excipients of the trial medications
•History of allergy, hypersensitivity or intolerance to trial medications or rescue medications
•A mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the trial, and/or evidence of an uncooperative attitude
•Unlikely to be able to complete the trial, for any reason, or likely to travel for extended periods of time during the grass pollen season
E.5 End points
E.5.1Primary end point(s)
The primary efficacy endpoints are the average rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score as well as the average rhinoconjunctivitis medication score. These two average scores will be calculated for each subject as the sum of the daily score throughout the entire grass pollen season, divided by the duration of the grass pollen season.
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
E.6Scope of the trial
E.6.1Diagnosis No
E.6.2Prophylaxis No
E.6.3Therapy No
E.6.4Safety Yes
E.6.5Efficacy Yes
E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
E.6.8Bioequivalence No
E.6.9Dose response No
E.6.10Pharmacogenetic Information not present in EudraCT
E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
E.6.13Others No
E.7Trial type and phase
E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
E.7.1.3Other No
E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes
E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
E.8 Design of the trial
E.8.1Controlled Yes
E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
E.8.1.2Open No
E.8.1.3Single blind No
E.8.1.4Double blind Yes
E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
E.8.1.6Cross over No
E.8.1.7Other Information not present in EudraCT
E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
E.8.2.2Placebo Yes
E.8.2.3Other No
E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States Yes
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA No
E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA Information not present in EudraCT
E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee Information not present in EudraCT
E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years1
E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months
E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days
E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years1
F. Population of Trial Subjects
F.1 Age Range
F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
F.1.1.1In Utero Information not present in EudraCT
F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) Information not present in EudraCT
F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) Information not present in EudraCT
F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) Information not present in EudraCT
F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) Information not present in EudraCT
F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) Information not present in EudraCT
F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Information not present in EudraCT
F.2 Gender
F.2.1Female Yes
F.2.2Male Yes
F.3 Group of trial subjects
F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
F.3.2Patients Yes
F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Information not present in EudraCT
F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception For clinical trials recorded in the database before the 10th March 2011 this question read: "Women of childbearing potential" and did not include the words "not using contraception". An answer of yes could have included women of child bearing potential whether or not they would be using contraception. The answer should therefore be understood in that context. This trial was recorded in the database on 2004-07-27. Yes
F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Information not present in EudraCT
F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
F.3.3.4Nursing women No
F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
F.3.3.7Others No
F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
F.4.1In the member state60
F.4.2 For a multinational trial
F.4.2.1In the EEA 600
F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 600
G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2004-08-24
N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2004-09-19
P. End of Trial
P.End of Trial StatusCompleted
P.Date of the global end of the trial2009-11-09
3
Iratkozz fel