Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Safety and Efficacy of Peginesatide Injection for the Maintenance of Anemia in Chronic Renal Failure Participants Who Are on Hemodialysis or Do Not Require Dialysis and Previously Treated With Darbepoetin Alfa.

26 giugno 2012 aggiornato da: Takeda

A Phase 2 Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Hematide Injection for the Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Subjects With Chronic Renal Failure Who Are on Hemodialysis or Do Not Require Dialysis and Previously Treated With Darbepoetin Alfa

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of Peginesatide Injection for the maintenance of anemia in patients with chronic renal failure who are on hemodialysis or do not require dialysis and who were previously treated with Darbepoetin Alfa.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Completato

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

Anemia, resulting primarily from insufficient production of erythropoietin to support erythropoiesis, is a common consequence of chronic renal failure. Both North America and Europe have established clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and hemoglobin targets in chronic renal failure/chronic kidney disease patients. These guidelines recommend the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). The benefits of ESA therapy include reduced fatigue, improved quality of life, decreased cardiovascular mortality risk and improved cardiovascular function. An increased risk of death and serious cardiovascular and thromboembolic events, including myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure, and hemodialysis graft occlusion have been observed in controlled clinical trials of ESAs when administered to target hemoglobin levels of ≥13.5 g/dL. The vast majority of patients receiving hemodialysis receive ESA therapy to treat their anemia and most patients begin ESA therapy prior to any requirement for dialysis.

Anemia of chronic renal failure is due to several factors, primarily the inability of the diseased kidneys to produce adequate amounts of endogenous erythropoietin. Ancillary factors also include the shortened lifespan of red blood cells, iron and other nutritional deficiencies, infection, and inflammation. The prevalence of anemia increases with progressive deterioration of renal function, and affects more than 90% of patients with chronic renal failure Stage 5 (End Stage Renal Disease). Anemia is associated with increased mortality, increased likelihood of hospitalization, reduced cognitive function and exercise capacity, increased left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure. Treatment of anemia reduces morbidity and mortality risks and may improve quality of life.

Erythropoiesis stimulating agents have been established as a treatment for anemia in chronic renal failure participants, and have improved the management of anemia over alternatives such as transfusion. Peginesatide (hematide) is a parenteral formulation being developed for the correction of anemia in patients with chronic renal failure, and binds to and activates the human erythropoietin receptor and stimulates erythropoiesis in human red cell precursors in a manner similar to other known erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.

Participants in this study received variable doses of peginesatide injection once every four weeks. Total commitment time for this study was about 30 weeks.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

102

Fase

  • Fase 2

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, Stati Uniti
      • Sacramento, California, Stati Uniti
      • San Diego, California, Stati Uniti
    • Connecticut
      • Middlebury, Connecticut, Stati Uniti
    • Florida
      • Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, Stati Uniti
    • Louisiana
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, Stati Uniti
    • Michigan
      • Dearborn, Michigan, Stati Uniti
    • Mississippi
      • Columbus, Mississippi, Stati Uniti
    • New York
      • Mineola, New York, Stati Uniti
    • Texas
      • Arlington, Texas, Stati Uniti

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

Da 18 anni a 90 anni (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient was a man or woman 18 to 90 years of age, inclusive.
  2. The patient had CKD and met 1 of the following criteria:

    1. Had been on dialysis for ≥6 months prior to enrollment, or
    2. Had not yet begun dialysis (hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) and was not anticipated to require initiation of dialysis during participation in the study.
  3. The patient was on stable darbepoetin alfa maintenance therapy (either SC or IV) continuously for a minimum of 8 weeks prior to enrollment.
  4. The patient had 4 consecutive Hb values with a mean ≥10.0 and ≤12.0 g/dL during screening period, with the difference between the mean of the first 2 consecutive Hb values and the mean of the last 2 consecutive values being ≤1.0 g/dL.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient had known bleeding or coagulation disorder.
  2. The patient had known hematologic disease or cause of anemia other than renal disease (i.e., pure red cell aplasia, homozygous sickle-cell disease, thalassemia, multiplemyeloma, hemolytic anemia, and myelodysplastic syndrome).
  3. The patient had received a recent course of intensive iron replacement (i.e., more than 500 mg IV in the 28 days prior to enrollment).
  4. The patient had advanced chronic CKD defined by New York Heart Association Class III or IV.
  5. The patient had a known history of seizure disorder or received antiepileptic medication for a seizure disorder within 6 months prior to enrollment.
  6. The patient had a scheduled kidney transplant. Patients currently on a transplant waiting list were not excluded, unless there was an identified donor.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Non randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione di gruppo singolo
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Peginesatide
Peginesatide 0.04 to 0.16 mg/kg, subcutaneous or intravenous injection, once every 4 weeks for up to 24 weeks. Initial dose based on patient's previous total weekly darbepoetin alfa dose, and thereafter could be adjusted to maintain hemoglobin values in the target range of 10 to 12 g/dL and ±1.5 g/dL from Baseline.
Altri nomi:
  • Omontys
  • Ematide
  • AF37702

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Mean Change in Hemoglobin Between Baseline and the Evaluation Period
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and Week 19 to Week 24.
Mean change in Hemoglobin between Baseline (the mean of the 4 most recent hemoglobin values prior to enrollment and the hemoglobin on the day of enrollment) and the Evaluation Period (mean hemoglobin from Weeks 19 to 24).
Baseline and Week 19 to Week 24.

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Within the Target Range of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL During the Evaluation Period
Lasso di tempo: Week 19 to Week 24

Mean hemoglobin was calculated from measurements taken during the Evaluation Period from Week 19 to Week 24. The target hemoglobin range was between 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL.

The 95% confidence interval was calculated from the normal approximation with continuity correction.

Week 19 to Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a Change in Hemoglobin From Baseline to the Evaluation Period Within 1 g/dL
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and Week 19 to Week 24.

Percentage of participants with a mean change in hemoglobin between Baseline (the mean of the 4 most recent hemoglobin values prior to enrollment and the hemoglobin on the day of enrollment) and the Evaluation Period (mean hemoglobin measured at Weeks 19 to 24) of less than or equal ± 1 g/dL.

The 95% confidence interval was calculated from the normal approximation with continuity correction.

Baseline and Week 19 to Week 24.
Percentage of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusions
Lasso di tempo: Up to 24 weeks.
The percentage of participants who received one or more red blood cell transfusions, including packed red blood cells and whole blood transfusions, during the Titration Period (Weeks 0 - 18) and Evaluation Period (Weeks 19 -24). 95% Confidence Intervals were calculated from the normal approximation with continuity correction.
Up to 24 weeks.
Mean Hemoglobin During 4-week Intervals
Lasso di tempo: Up to 24 weeks.
Hemoglobin was measured every 2 weeks during the Titration Period (Weeks 0-18) and weekly during the Evaluation Period (Weeks 19-24).
Up to 24 weeks.
Percentage of Participants With Target Hemoglobin of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL by 4-week Intervals.
Lasso di tempo: Up to 24 weeks.
Percentage of participants with mean hemoglobin levels falling between the target level of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL during 4-week study intervals. Hemoglobin was measured every 2 weeks during the Titration Period (Weeks 0-18) and weekly during the Evaluation Period (Weeks 19-24). 95% Confidence Intervals were calculated from the normal approximation with continuity correction.
Up to 24 weeks.
Percentage of Participants With Dose Adjustments During the Study
Lasso di tempo: From Week 4 to Week 20
The peginesatide dose was adjusted to maintain Hemoglobin values in the target range of 10 to 12 g/dL and ±1.5 g/dL from Baseline during the Titration Period (Weeks 0-18) and Evaluation Period (Weeks 19-24). A dose was classified as adjusted if it was not within 20% of the previous dose. A dose was classified as increased or decreased if it was >20% higher or >20% lower respectively, than the previous dose.
From Week 4 to Week 20

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Collaboratori

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio

1 settembre 2008

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

1 dicembre 2009

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

1 dicembre 2009

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

11 settembre 2008

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

12 settembre 2008

Primo Inserito (Stima)

15 settembre 2008

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Stima)

27 luglio 2012

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

26 giugno 2012

Ultimo verificato

1 giugno 2012

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • AFX01_202
  • 2008-003459-64 (Numero EudraCT)
  • U1111-1114-1500 (Identificatore di registro: WHO)

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

3
Sottoscrivi