Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy With Double-Tract Reconstruction Versus Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Upper Early Gastric Cancer: A KLASS 05 Randomized Clinical Trial

Sun-Hwi Hwang, Do Joong Park, Hyung-Ho Kim, Woo Jin Hyung, Hoon Hur, Han-Kwang Yang, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Hyoung-Il Kim, Seong-Ho Kong, Young Woo Kim, Han Hong Lee, Beom Su Kim, Young-Kyu Park, Young-Joon Lee, Sang-Hoon Ahn, In-Seob Lee, Yun-Suhk Suh, Ji-Ho Park, Soyeon Ahn, Sang-Uk Han, Sun-Hwi Hwang, Do Joong Park, Hyung-Ho Kim, Woo Jin Hyung, Hoon Hur, Han-Kwang Yang, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Hyoung-Il Kim, Seong-Ho Kong, Young Woo Kim, Han Hong Lee, Beom Su Kim, Young-Kyu Park, Young-Joon Lee, Sang-Hoon Ahn, In-Seob Lee, Yun-Suhk Suh, Ji-Ho Park, Soyeon Ahn, Sang-Uk Han

Abstract

Purpose: Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (LPG-DTR) is a function-preserving procedure performed for treating upper early gastric cancer (EGC). However, few studies have compared the outcomes of LPG-DTR with those of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). This study aimed at comparing the short-term outcomes of LPG-DTR between LTG and upper EGC.

Materials and methods: For upper-third EGC, a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial was performed to compare those who underwent LPG-DTR with those who underwent LTG. Short-term outcomes, including clinicopathologic results, morbidity, mortality, and postoperative courses, were evaluated using a full analysis set based on the intention-to-treat principle and the per-protocol set.

Results: Of the patients, 138 who fulfilled the criteria were randomized to each group. One patient in the LPG-DTR group withdrew consent. Sixty-eight patients underwent LPG-DTR and 69 underwent LTG. The operative time (LPG-DTR=219.4 minutes; LTG=201.8 minutes; P=0.085), estimated blood loss (LPG-DTR=76.0 mL; LTG=66.1 mL; P=0.413), and the morbidity rate (LPG-DTR=23.5%; LTG=17.4%; P=0.373) between the groups were not significantly different. No mortality occurred in either of the study groups. Two weeks post operation, the Visick scores for postprandial symptoms, including reflux symptoms, were not significantly different between the groups (P=0.749). Laboratory findings on postoperative day 5 were not significantly different between the groups.

Conclusions: The short-term outcomes of LPG-DTR for upper EGC were comparable to those of LTG.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02892643.

Keywords: Diagnosis; Laparoscopy; Surgery; Treatment.

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Woo Jin Hyung received grants from Medtronic and Green Cross Pharma during the study. Dr. Han-Kwang Yang received grants from Stryker during the study. Dr. Hyung-Ho Kim received grants from Olympus Korea during the study period. Dr. Hoon Hur reported receiving speaker honoraria from Johnson & Johnson Medical during the conduct of the study and grants from AstraZeneca and Dong-A ST. Dr. Do Joong Park reported receiving grants from Medtronic and Daewoong Pharmaceutical during the study. Dr. Sang-Uk Han received grants from Jeil Pharmaceutical, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, and Johnson & Johnson during the study. Dr. Young-Kyu Park received grants from Ethicon Endo-Surgery and Novomics during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Copyright © 2022. Korean Gastric Cancer Association.

Figures

Fig. 1. Flow diagram.
Fig. 1. Flow diagram.
LPG-DTR = laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction; LTG = laparoscopic total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction.

References

    1. Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Yoo MW, Jeong SH, Park DJ, Kim HH, et al. Changes in clinicopathological features and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer over a 20-year period. Br J Surg. 2011;98:255–260.
    1. Information Committee of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association. Korean Gastric Cancer Association-led nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancers in 2019. J Gastric Cancer. 2021;21:221–235.
    1. Ahn SH, Lee JH, Park DJ, Kim HH. Comparative study of clinical outcomes between laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG) and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for proximal gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2013;16:282–289.
    1. Jung DH, Ahn SH, Park DJ, Kim HH. Proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer. 2015;15:77–86.
    1. Jung DH, Lee Y, Kim DW, Park YS, Ahn SH, Park DJ, et al. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction is superior to laparoscopic total gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:3961–3969.
    1. Ko HJ, Kim KH, Lee SH, Choi CW, Kim SJ, In Choi C, et al. Can proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction replace total gastrectomy? A propensity score matching analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24:516–524.
    1. Guideline Committee of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA), Development Working Group & Review Panel. Korean practice guideline for gastric cancer 2018: an evidence-based, multi-disciplinary approach. J Gastric Cancer. 2019;19:1–48.
    1. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition) Gastric Cancer. 2021;24:1–21.
    1. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213.
    1. Wang L, Xia Y, Jiang T, Li F, Wang W, Zhang D, et al. Short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus laparoscopic total gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: a matched-cohort study. J Surg Res. 2020;246:292–299.
    1. Ahn SH, Jung DH, Son SY, Lee CM, Park DJ, Kim HH. Laparoscopic double-tract proximal gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17:562–570.
    1. Hyung WJ, Yang HK, Han SU, Lee YJ, Park JM, Kim JJ, et al. A feasibility study of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a prospective multi-center phase II clinical trial, KLASS 03. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22:214–222.
    1. Yang HK, Hyung WJ, Han SU, Lee YJ, Park JM, Cho GS, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes among different methods of esophagojejunostomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy for clinical stage I proximal gastric cancer: results of a single-arm multicenter phase II clinical trial in Korea, KLASS 03. Surg Endosc. 2021;35:1156–1163.
    1. Liu F, Huang C, Xu Z, Su X, Zhao G, Ye J, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic vs open total gastrectomy for clinical stage I gastric cancer: the CLASS02 multicenter randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6:1590–1597.
    1. Park JH, Berlth F, Wang C, Wang S, Choi JH, Park SH, et al. Mapping of the perigastric lymphatic network using indocyanine green fluorescence imaging and tissue marking dye in clinically advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022;48:411–417.
    1. Lee S, Song JH, Choi S, Cho M, Kim YM, Kim HI, et al. Fluorescent lymphography during minimally invasive total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an effective technique for splenic hilar lymph node dissection. Surg Endosc. 2021
    1. Ichikawa D, Komatsu S, Kosuga T, Konishi H, Okamoto K, Shiozaki A, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of clinical early gastric cancer in the upper-third stomach. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:12851–12856.
    1. Nanishi K, Shoda K, Kubota T, Kosuga T, Konishi H, Shiozaki A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the gastric cancer T-category with respect to tumor localization. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020;405:787–796.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi