Favourable prognosis of trigeminal neuralgia when enrolled in a multidisciplinary management program - a two-year prospective real-life study

Tone Bruvik Heinskou, Stine Maarbjerg, Frauke Wolfram, Per Rochat, Jannick Brennum, Jes Olesen, Lars Bendtsen, Tone Bruvik Heinskou, Stine Maarbjerg, Frauke Wolfram, Per Rochat, Jannick Brennum, Jes Olesen, Lars Bendtsen

Abstract

Background: Prognosis of medically treated trigeminal neuralgia patients is assumed to be poor, but the evidence is lacking. Thus, prospective real-life studies of medical management of trigeminal neuralgia are warranted.

Methods: This was an observational study. Patients were consecutively enrolled in a structured management program at a specialist centre for facial pain. Optimisation of medical treatment, physiotherapy, psychotherapy, and advice from trained nurses, were parts of the program. Medically intractable patients were referred for neurosurgery. Data-collection was prospective using standardised schemes and patient surveys. The aim was to describe the two-year outcome of medical treatment at the specialist centre. The primary outcome was a 50% reduction in the overall burden of pain according to a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) after two years.

Results: A total of 186 primary TN patients were enrolled in the program of which 103 patients remained medically managed and completed the two-year follow-up. Fifty patients were treated surgically within the first two years of follow-up. Half of the medically managed patients (53 (51%)), had more than a 50% reduction in the overall burden of pain over the two-year period. The overall burden of pain on NRS decreased from mean 5.34 to 3.00, p < 0.01. There was no significant association between primary outcome and sex, depression and/or anxiety, concomitant persistent pain, or neurovascular contact with morphological changes of the trigeminal nerve.

Conclusions: Patients with trigeminal neuralgia improve over a two-year period when enrolled in a structured medical management program. Optimisation of drug treatment, continuous advice and education and support by the multidisciplinary team, referral of the medically intractable patients for surgery or the natural history of the disease, can be some of the reasons for the improvement. The favourable prognosis provides hope and optimism for medically managed TN patients.

Trial registration: Current study was observational, and patients were offered standard clinical care and laboratory workups according to current American Academy of Neurology and European Federation of Neurological Societies treatment guidelines. The study has been registered at ClincalTrials.gov. ID: NCT03838393 .

Keywords: Individualized drug treatment; Multidisciplinary management; Natural history; Observational study; Outcome; Real-life study.

Conflict of interest statement

Lars Bendtsen (LB): Within the last 3 years LB has served on the scientific advisory board for Novartis, Allergan and Biogen, has been principal investigator for Biogen, and has given lectures for Allergan, Novartis and Teva.

All authors but Lars Bendtsen, declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

TH, SM, PR, FW, JB and JO authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of included patients

References

    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(1):1–211
    1. Zakrzewska JM, Patsalos PN. Long-term cohort study comparing medical (oxcarbazepine) and surgical management of intractable trigeminal neuralgia. Pain. 2002;95(3):259–266. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00406-7.
    1. Taylor JC, Brauer S, Espir ML. Long-term treatment of trigeminal neuralgia with carbamazepine. Postgrad Med J. 1981;57(663):16–18. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.57.663.16.
    1. Di Stefano G, La Cesa S, Truini A, Cruccu G. Natural history and outcome of 200 outpatients with classical trigeminal neuralgia treated with carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine in a tertiary Centre for neuropathic pain. J Headache Pain. 2014;15(1):1–5. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-15-34.
    1. Maarbjerg S, Wolfram F, Gozalov A, Olesen J, Bendtsen L. Association between neurovascular contact and clinical characteristics in classical trigeminal neuralgia: a prospective clinical study using 3.0 tesla MRI. Cephalalgia. 2015;35(0):1077–1084
    1. Rasmussen P. Facial pain. II. A prospective survey of 1052 patients with a view of: character of the attacks, onset, course, and character of pain. Acta Neurochir(Wien) 1990;107(3–4):121–128. doi: 10.1007/BF01405790.
    1. Benoliel R, Zini A, Khan J, Almoznino G, Sharav Y, Haviv Y. Trigeminal neuralgia (part II): factors affecting early pharmacotherapeutic outcome. Cephalalgia. 2016;36(8):747–759. doi: 10.1177/0333102415611406.
    1. Sindou M, Leston J, Decullier E, Chapuis F. Microvascular decompression for primary trigeminal neuralgia: long-term effectiveness and prognostic factors in a series of 362 consecutive patients with clear-cut neurovascular conflicts who underwent pure decompression. JNeurosurg. 2007;107(6):1144–1153.
    1. Miller JP, Acar F, Burchiel KJ. Classification of trigeminal neuralgia: clinical, therapeutic, and prognostic implications in a series of 144 patients undergoing microvascular decompression. JNeurosurg. 2009;111(6):1231–1234.
    1. Heinskou TB, Rochat P, Maarbjerg S et al. Prognostic factors for outcome of microvascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia. Cephalalgia. 2018;1(0):1–12
    1. Cruccu G, Gronseth G, Alksne J, Argoff C, Brainin M, Burchiel K, et al. AAN-EFNS guidelines on trigeminal neuralgia management. EurJNeurol. 2008;15(10):1013–1028.
    1. Gronseth G, Cruccu G, Alksne J, Argoff C, Brainin M, Burchiel K, et al. Practice parameter: the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (an evidence-based review) Neurology. 2008;71:1183–1190. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000326598.83183.04.
    1. Tölle T, Dukes E, Sadosky A. Patient burden of trigeminal neuralgia: results from a cross-sectional survey of health state impairment and treatment patterns in six European countries. Pain Pract. 2006;6(3):153–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2006.00079.x.
    1. Bothwell LE, Greene JA, Podolsky SH, Jones DS. Assessing the gold standard — lessons from the history of RCTs. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(22):2175–2181. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1604593.
    1. Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(25):1887–1892. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200006223422507.
    1. Finnerup NB, Sindrup SH, Jensen TS. The evidence for pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain. Pain. 2010;150(3):573–581. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.06.019.
    1. Zakrzewska JM, Wu J, Mon-Williams M, Phillips N, Pavitt SH. Evaluating the impact of trigeminal neuralgia. Pain. 2017;1:1166–1174. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000853.
    1. Heinskou T, Maarbjerg S, Rochat P, Wolfram F, Jensen RH, Bendtsen L. Trigeminal neuralgia – a coherent cross-specialty management program. J Headache Pain. 2015;16(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s10194-015-0550-4.
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition (beta version) Cephalalgia. 2013;33(9):629–808. doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658.
    1. Melek LN, Devine M, Renton T. The psychosocial impact of orofacial pain in trigeminal neuralgia patients: a systematic review. International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018.
    1. Maarbjerg S, Wolfram F, Gozalov A, Olesen J, Bendtsen L. Significance of neurovascular contact in classical trigeminal neuralgia. Brain. 2015;138(2):311–319. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu349.
    1. Chen HI, Lee JY. The measurement of pain in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. Clin.Neurosurg. 2010;57:129–133.
    1. Brailo V, Zakrzewska JM. Grading the intensity of nondental orofacial pain: identification of cutoff points for mild, moderate, and severe pain. J Pain Res. 2015;8:95–104. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S75192.
    1. O’Brien EM, Staud RM, Hassinger AD, McCulloch RC, Craggs JG, Atchison JW, et al. Patient-centered perspective on treatment outcomes in chronic pain. Pain Med. 2010;11(1):6–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00685.x.
    1. Gatchel RJ, Okifuji A. Evidence-based scientific data documenting the treatment and cost-effectiveness of comprehensive pain programs for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain. 2006;7(11):779–793. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.08.005.
    1. Mai LM, Clark AJ, Gordon AS, Lynch ME, Morley-forster PK, Nathan H et al (2019) Long-Term Outcomes in the Management of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy. Can J Neurol Sci:337–342
    1. Gaul C, Van Doorn C, Webering N, Dlugaj M, Katsarava Z, Diener HC, et al. Clinical outcome of a headache-specific multidisciplinary treatment program and adherence to treatment recommendations in a tertiary headache center: an observational study. J Headache Pain. 2011;12(4):475–483. doi: 10.1007/s10194-011-0348-y.
    1. Prasad S, Galetta S. Trigeminal neuralgia historical notes and current concepts. Neurologist. 2009;15(2):87–94. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e3181775ac3.
    1. Devor M, Amir R, Rappaport ZH. Pathophysiology of trigeminal neuralgia: the ignition hypothesis. Clin J Pain. 2002;18(1):4–13. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200201000-00002.
    1. Maarbjerg S, Gozalov A, Olesen J, Bendtsen L. Concomitant persistent pain in classical trigeminal neuralgia - evidence for different subtypes. Headache. 2014;54:1173–1183. doi: 10.1111/head.12384.
    1. Zakrzewska JM, Wu N, Lee JYK, Werneburg B, Hoffman D, Liu Y (2018) Characterizing treatment utilization patterns for trigeminal neuralgia in the United States. Clin J Pain:1
    1. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PCVJSI. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE)statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(1):1453–1457. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi