Prognosis of Trigeminal Neuralgia When Enrolled in a Multidisciplinary Management Program

February 11, 2019 updated by: Tone Heinskou, Danish Headache Center

Prognosis of Trigeminal Neuralgia When Enrolled in a Multidisciplinary Management Program - a Two-year Prospective Real-life Study

Background: Prognosis of medically treated trigeminal neuralgia patients is assumed to be poor, but the evidence is lacking. Thus, prospective real-life studies of medical management of trigeminal neuralgia are warranted.

Methods: Observational study. Patients were consecutively enrolled in a structured management program at a specialist centre for facial pain. Optimisation of medical treatment, physiotherapy, psychotherapy, and advice from trained nurses, were parts of the program. Medically intractable patients were referred for neurosurgery. Data-collection was prospective using standardised schemes and patient surveys. The aim was to describe the two-year outcome of medical treatment at the specialist centre. The primary outcome was a 50% reduction in the overall burden of pain according to a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) after two years.

This study aimed to provide evidence concerning the real-life efficacy of medical management of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) when directed by specialists. The investigatgors hypothesised that the two-year prognosis in a group of medically managed TN patients enrolled in a structured multidisciplinary management program was favourable, defined as a 50 % reduction of the overall burden of pain over a two-year period

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

186

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The diagnostic criteria used in this study were the beta version of the 3rd edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3-beta). Until the publication of IHCD-3-beta, ICHD 2 criteria were used. According to the ICHD-3 classification, this study included patients with both idiopathic and classical TN; in this paper termed primary TNThe number of patients enrolled in the inclusion period determined the sample size.

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. recordings of the intensity of pain at enrolment of the programme (baseline recording),
  2. a two-year assessment (end-point recording),
  3. recording of effect and side-effects of drug treatment (at baseline and endpoint).

The exclusion criteria

  1. initiation of medical treatment at the DHC before May 2012,
  2. neurosurgical treatment of TN within the two-year follow-up
  3. incomplete two-year follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in overall burden of pain NRS over a two-year period
Time Frame: 2 years
Defined as a good outcome, i.e number of patients who had a reduction of minimum 50% on the NRS two years after enrolment in the management program compared with baseline
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
No changes of the overall burden of pain NRS over the two-year follow-up period
Time Frame: 2 years
Defined as poor outcome, i.e number of patients who had a no reduction the NRS two years after enrolment in the management program compared with baseline
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trigeminal Neuralgia

Clinical Trials on multidisciplinary management

3
Subscribe