On the optimal temporal resolution for phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: establishment of baseline values

Francesco Santini, Michele Pansini, Maja Hrabak-Paar, Denise Yates, Thomas H Langenickel, Jens Bremerich, Oliver Bieri, Tilman Schubert, Francesco Santini, Michele Pansini, Maja Hrabak-Paar, Denise Yates, Thomas H Langenickel, Jens Bremerich, Oliver Bieri, Tilman Schubert

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to quantify the frequency content of the blood velocity waveform in different body regions by means of phase contrast (PC) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and Doppler ultrasound. The highest frequency component of the spectrum is inversely proportional to the ideal temporal resolution to be used for the acquisition of flow-sensitive imaging (Shannon-Nyquist theorem).

Methods: Ten healthy subjects (median age 33y, range 24-40) were scanned with a high-temporal-resolution PC-CMR and with Doppler ultrasound on three body regions (carotid arteries, aorta and femoral arteries). Furthermore, 111 patients (median age 61y) with mild to moderate arterial hypertension and 58 patients with aortic aregurgitation, atrial septal defect, or repaired tetralogy of Fallot underwent aortic CMR scanning. The frequency power distribution was calculated for each location and the maximum frequency component, fmax, was extracted and expected limits for the general population were inferred.

Results: In the healthy subject cohort, significantly different fmax values were found across the different body locations, but they were nonsignificant across modalities. No significant correlation was found with heart rate. The measured fmax ranged from 7.7 ± 1.1 Hz in the ascending aorta, up to 12.3 ± 5.1 Hz in the femoral artery (considering PC-CMR data). The calculated upper boundary for the general population ranged from 11.0 Hz to 27.5 Hz, corresponding to optimal temporal resolutions of 45 ms and 18 ms, respectively. The patient cohort exhibited similar values for the frequencies in the aorta, with no correlation between blood pressure and frequency content.

Conclusions: The temporal resolution of PC-CMR acquisitions can be adapted based on the scanned body region and in the adult population, should approach approximately 20 ms in the peripheral arteries and 40 ms in the aorta.

Trial registration: This study presents results from a restrospective analysis of the clinical study NCT01870739 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Keywords: Doppler ultrasound; Frequency content; Phase contrast MRI; Temporal resolution.

Conflict of interest statement

There are no competing interests pertaining this study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Exemplary CMR images at the three locations: common carotid artery (a, d); aorta (b, e); common femoral artery (c, f). The top row represents magnitude images, and the bottom row represents phase contrast images. Arrows point at the vessels of interest
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Spectrum of one waveform acquired at the same location by CMR (solid line) and Doppler (dashed line)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Velocity waveforms (left) and corresponding power spectra (right) at three different locations (CCA = common carotid artery, AAo = ascending aorta, CFA = common femoral artery) in one healthy subject
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Representative (mean-detrended) velocity waveform in the ascending aorta of a healthy subject reconstructed from a full spectrum (solid black line) and with various percentages of the spectrum retained (99, 95, and 90%)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Distributions of maximum detected frequencies across the healthy subjects grouped by location and modality (CCA = Common Carotid Artery, AAo = Ascending Aorta, DAo = Descending Aorta, CFA = Common Femoral Artery)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
fmax99 distributions in the ascending aorta (blue) and descending (orange) aorta with respect to patient age (a) and estimated central mean pressure (b)

References

    1. Wendt RE, Rokey R, Wong WF, Marks A. Magnetic resonance velocity measurements in small arteries. Comparison with Doppler ultrasonic measurements in the aortas of normal rabbits. Investig Radiol. 1992;27:499–503. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199207000-00002.
    1. Rebergen SA, van der Wall EE, Doornbos J, de Roos A. Magnetic resonance measurement of velocity and flow: technique, validation, and cardiovascular applications. Am Heart J. 1993;126:1439–1456. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(93)90544-J.
    1. Lotz J, Meier C, Leppert A, Galanski M. Cardiovascular flow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging: basic facts and implementation. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc. 2002;22:651–671.
    1. Schubert T, Bieri O, Pansini M, Stippich C, Santini F. Peak velocity measurements in tortuous arteries with phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging: the effect of multidirectional velocity encoding. Investig Radiol. 2014;49:189–194. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000013.
    1. Buonocore MH, Bogren H. Factors influencing the accuracy and precision of velocity-encoded phase imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1992;26:141–154. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910260115.
    1. Markl M, Chan FP, Alley MT, Wedding KL, Draney MT, Elkins CJ, et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:499–506. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10272.
    1. Santini F, Wetzel SG, Bock J, Markl M, Scheffler K. Time-resolved three-dimensional (3D) phase-contrast (PC) balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med. 2009;62:966–974. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22087.
    1. Gu T, Korosec FR, Block WF, Fain SB, Turk Q, Lum D, et al. PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:743–749.
    1. Chatzimavroudis GP, Zhang H, Halliburton SS, Moore JR, Simonetti OP, Schvartzman PR, et al. Clinical blood flow quantification with segmented k-space magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:65–71. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10231.
    1. Schmieder RE, Wagner F, Mayr M, Delles C, Ott C, Keicher C, et al. The effect of sacubitril/valsartan compared to olmesartan on cardiovascular remodelling in subjects with essential hypertension: the results of a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:3308–3317. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx525.
    1. Cameron JD, McGrath BP, Dart AM. Use of radial artery applanation tonometry and a generalized transfer function to determine aortic pressure augmentation in subjects with treated hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1214–1220. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00411-2.
    1. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM), American College of Radiology (ACR), Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) AIUM practice guideline for the performance of peripheral arterial ultrasound examinations using color and spectral doppler imaging. J Ultrasound Med Off J Am Inst Ultrasound Med. 2014;33:1111–1121.
    1. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Radiology, Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound AIUM practice guideline for the performance of an ultrasound examination of the extracranial cerebrovascular system. J Ultrasound Med Off J Am Inst Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:145–154.
    1. Frayne R, Rutt BK. Frequency response to retrospectively gated phase-contrast MR imaging: effect of interpolation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;3:907–917. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880030619.
    1. R Development Core Team . R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2008.
    1. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. ArXiv14065823 Stat. 2014; Available from: . Cited 2015 Jun 10.
    1. Kohn JC, Lampi MC, Reinhart-King CA. Age-related vascular stiffening: causes and consequences. Front Genet. 2015;6 Available from: . Cited 2018 Dec 3.
    1. Holdsworth DW, Norley CJ, Frayne R, Steinman DA, Rutt BK. Characterization of common carotid artery blood-flow waveforms in normal human subjects. Physiol Meas. 1999;20:219–240. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/20/3/301.
    1. Stadlbauer A, van der Riet W, Crelier G, Salomonowitz E. Accelerated time-resolved three-dimensional MR velocity mapping of blood flow patterns in the aorta using SENSE and k-t BLAST. Eur J Radiol. 2010;75:e15–e21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.06.009.
    1. Jung B, Stalder AF, Bauer S, Markl M. On the undersampling strategies to accelerate time-resolved 3D imaging using k-t-GRAPPA. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med. 2011;66:966–975. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22875.
    1. Peng H-H, Bauer S, Huang T-Y, Chung H-W, Hennig J, Jung B, et al. Optimized parallel imaging for dynamic PC-MRI with multidirectional velocity encoding. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med. 2010;64:472–480. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22432.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi