A Study to Evaluate the Effect of LCZ696 on Aortic Stiffness in Subjects With Hypertension

December 9, 2020 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Parallel Group, 52-week Study to Evaluate the Effect of LCZ696 Compared to Olmesartan on Regional Aortic Stiffness in Subjects With Essential Hypertension

This was the first evaluation of the effects of LCZ696 on local and regional measures of aortic stiffness in subjects with mild to moderate hypertension and widened pulse pressure. The results of this exploratory study will help to understand the mechanism of action of LCZ696 and used to inform the design of future clinical studies with LCZ696 in subjects with cardiovascular diseases.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

115

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Erlangen, Germany, 91054
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Basel, Switzerland, 4031
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Scotland
      • Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom, G12 8TA
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with essential hypertension, untreated or currently taking antihypertensive therapy

Key exclusion Criteria:

  • women of child bearing potential (WOCBP) if not on highly effective contraception
  • Malignant or severe hypertension (grade 3 of WHO classification)
  • History or evidence of a secondary form of hypertension
  • Transient ischemic cerebral attack (TIA) during the 12 months prior to screening or any history of stroke.
  • Previous or current diagnosis of heart failure (New York Heart Association Class II-IV).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696)

Single drug treatment period: Patients received LCZ696 200mg once daily (q.d.) + placebo to 20 mg olmesartan q.d for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks, patients were dosed at the maintenance dose level (400 mg qd LCZ696 + placebo to 40 mg qd olmesartan) for 10 weeks.

Add-on Period: After 12 weeks on single-drug treatment, patients continued in the study on the blinded maintenance dose and if required, open label amlodipine (2.5 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg qd) was added to the treatment regimen and titrated according to the investigator's discretion to achieve target blood pressure.

200 mg tablets
placebo
If required, open label amlodipine (2.5 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg qd) was added to treatment regimen
Active Comparator: olmesartan

Single drug treatment period: Patients received 20 mg olmesartan q.d + placebo to LCZ696 200mg once daily (q.d.) for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks, patients were dosed at the maintenance dose level (40 mg olmesartan q.d + placebo to 400 mg qd LCZ696) for 10 weeks.

Add-on Period: After 12 weeks on single-drug treatment, patients continued in the study on the blinded maintenance dose and if required, open label amlodipine (2.5 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg qd) was added to the treatment regimen and titrated according to the investigator's discretion to achieve target blood pressure.

If required, open label amlodipine (2.5 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg qd) was added to treatment regimen
placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Ascending Aorta Distensibility at 52 Week
Time Frame: Baseline, 52 weeks
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were obtained at baseline prior to randomization, at week 52 for the assessment of local aortic distensibility. Ascending aorta distensibility was one of the 3 components for measuring local arota distensibility.
Baseline, 52 weeks
Change From Baseline in Proximal Descending Aorta Distensibility at 52 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 52 weeks
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were obtained at baseline prior to randomization, at week 52 for the assessment of local aortic distensibility. Proximal descending aorta distensibility was one of the 3 components for measuring local arota distensibility.
Baseline, 52 weeks
Change From Baseline in Distal Descending Aorta Distensibility at 52 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 52 weeks
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were obtained at baseline prior to randomization, at week 52 for the assessment of local aortic distensibility. Distal descending aorta distensibility was one of the 3 components for measuring local arota distensibility.
Baseline, 52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Local Aortic Strain at 52 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 52 weeks
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were obtained at baseline prior to randomization, at week 52 for the assessment of local aortic strain. Local aortic strain was measured by assessing ascending aorta strain, proximal descending aorta strain and distal descending aorta strain.
Baseline, 52 weeks
Change From Baseline in Regional Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity at 52 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 52 weeks
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were obtained at baseline prior to randomization, at week 52 for the assessment of regional aortic pulse wave velocity.
Baseline, 52 weeks
Change From Baseline in Central Blood Pressure at 52 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 52 weeks
Central blood pressure was determined by measuring central systolic blood pressure , diastolic blood pressure and pulse pressure.
Baseline, 52 weeks
Change From Baseline in Augmentation Pressure at 52 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 52 weeks
Augmentation pressure is the added pressure during systole due to wave reflection.
Baseline, 52 weeks
Change From Baseline in Augmentation Index at 52 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 52 weeks
Augmentation index (Alx) is the percentage of the central pulse pressure due to wave reflection.
Baseline, 52 weeks
Change From Baseline in Carotid-femoral Pulse Wave Velocity at 52 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 52 weeks
For pulse wave velocity calculation, the pressure waveform at the femoral site (using a partially inflated custom blood pressure cuff) and the carotid site (using hand -held applanation tonometry) were measured simultaneously. Pulse wave analysis was performed on the central aortic pressure waveform as derived from the brachial pressure waveform recorded in a partially-inflated blood pressure cuff around the upper arm.
Baseline, 52 weeks
Number of Patients With Reported Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Death
Time Frame: 12 weeks
This outcome measure summarizes patients with any adverse events, serious adverse events and death.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 6, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696)

3
Subscribe