このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Surgical Optimizing of a Middle Ear Implant (MET )With Laser Velocimetry in Patients With Moderate to Severe Hearing Loss in Case of Failure of Conventional Equipment (IOM laser)

2017年8月17日 更新者:Hospices Civils de Lyon

Pilot Study Evaluating Surgical Optimizing of a Middle Ear Implant (MET )With Laser Velocimetry in Patients With Moderate to Severe Hearing Loss in Case of Failure of Conventional Equipment

The aging of the population, and greater exposure to noise, are responsible for an increased incidence of hearing loss (presbycusis). This hearing loss is sensorineural disability that has become a real public health problem. The main means of rehabilitation of this disability is represented by the apparatus of patients with conventional hearing aids. However, these hearing aids have several drawbacks that limit their profits, often abandoning the prosthesis by the patient.

Middle ear implants were developed to answer these problems. They are intended to amplify the sound signal by transmitting directly to the middle ear to compensate for the hearing loss and are indicated in case of failure or contraindication of conventional equipment. However, these middle ear implants currently have limitations as performance failure. Recent data show that the performance of the ossicles repair techniques are dependent on the coupling of the ossicular prosthesis to the ossicles. Furthermore, advances in the understanding of the biomechanics of the ossicles confirm the importance of the placement and linkage of surgical restoration processes. This data can be applied to middle ear implants to improve performance. Indeed, a preliminary experimental study on anatomical parts, using analysis of the vibration of the middle ear structures by laser velocimetry, allowed the investigators to define the transducer placement method and coupling method to ossicles.

Investigators wish to validate in vivo results in a pilot study on a small number of patients by comparing two surgical techniques guided by velocimetric measures.

調査の概要

状態

完了

条件

介入・治療

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

2

段階

  • 適用できない

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

18年歳以上 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 to 60 years;
  • Having given written informed consent prior to any procedure related to the study;
  • Covered by a Health System where applicable, and/or in compliance with the recommendations of the national laws in force relating to biomedical research.
  • Indication and IOM implantation request by the patient with a patient physically, psychologically and legally able to ask its implementation
  • Average deafness to severe (mean thresholds between 40 to 90 dB) with speech discrimination> 40% to 75 dB.
  • Deafness of pure perception or mixed hearing loss
  • Non-fluctuating deafness over the last two years
  • Failed or cons-indication to conventional equipment
  • Rocky Scanner and MRI normal brain
  • Patient fluent in French (to ensure validity audiological measures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women or likely to be during the study.
  • Not affiliated with a social security scheme Patients
  • Major Patients protected by provisions of the law (Public Health Code).
  • Refusal of consent.
  • Ongoing Participation in another study that may interfere with the proposed study (investigator assessment).
  • Existence of a cons-indication for surgery or port of the implant
  • Motivation only aesthetic, evaluated by the principal investigator.
  • Inability of predictable medium-term monitoring.
  • Acoustic neuroma, tumors and other evolutionary processes of the rock and the cerebellopontine angle.
  • Pathology requiring follow-up MRI (IOM against-indicating MRI).
  • Patient with against-indication to MRI.
  • Contraindication to the establishment of a pacemaker ossicular MET

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:他の
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:ダブル

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
他の:control
standard care : usual technique for implanting

Usual implantation technique of a middle ear implant. The principle of the ossicular stimulator middle ear transducer MET 7000 (Middle Ear Transducer, METTM) is to directly transmit sounds on the ossicles bypassing the outer ear. Their constraint is the surgical placement of the implant.

MET 7000 system (OTOLOGICS LLC, USA) is the implant that the investigators will use for their patients. The stimulator is usually placed against the body of the anvil by simple contact in the case of sensorineural hearing loss. In the case of mixed hearing loss, the stimulator will come in contact with the bracket using a titanium clip (ossicular prosthesis used in otologic surgery for ossiculoplasties). The optimized version corresponds to the use of the conventionally used in mixed deafness and applied to neurosensory deafness art. It is screwed onto the mastoid bone, the motor is suspended in the mastoid cavity and transmits vibrations to the body of the anvil by simple contact of the transducer.

実験的:laser velocimetry
optimized implantation of laser velocimetry
他の名前:
  • Group benefiting from the implantation technique optimized by laser velocimetry of a middle ear implant.( the MET ossicular stimulator 7000 the company "Otologics LLC")

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change from Baseline hearing at 8 months post-implantation (hearing gain), measured by tone and speech audiometry
時間枠:at baseline (day 0) and 8 months
The hearing will be measured by tone and speech audiometry in silence and in noise (dB) Results will be averaged per patient.
at baseline (day 0) and 8 months

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Number of surgical implantation performed for the surgical laser velocimetry optimization technique
時間枠:at 14 months
number of surgical implantations performed in the required conditions and, if necessary, deviations will be described.
at 14 months
description of adverse events throughout the study
時間枠:pre and post-operatively at day 0, at day 4, day 8 and then at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 14 months.
pre and post-operatively at day 0, at day 4, day 8 and then at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 14 months.
Middle ear transfer function measured by laser velocimetry
時間枠:pre-operatively at day 0 and then at 2, 3, 8 and 14 months.
measured in mm/s/Pa
pre-operatively at day 0 and then at 2, 3, 8 and 14 months.
Tone and speech audiometry in silence and in noise (dB)
時間枠:Baseline at inclusion visit, day 0, and then at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 14 months.
Baseline at inclusion visit, day 0, and then at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 14 months.
Change in the quality of life measured by GHSI (Glasgow Health Status Inventory) score
時間枠:day 0, and 2, 3, 5, 8 and 14 months.
Changes will be described in both groups. GHSI questionnaire appreciate the impact of hearing loss on quality of life and whose translation is adapted to the French context.
day 0, and 2, 3, 5, 8 and 14 months.
Change in the quality of life measured by GBI (Glasgow Benefit Inventory) score
時間枠:day 0, and 2, 3, 5, 8 and 14 months.
Changes will be described in both groups. GBI questionnaire appreciate the benefit of the port of hearing aid before surgery and the benefit of the middle ear implant after the surgery.
day 0, and 2, 3, 5, 8 and 14 months.
Change in the quality of life measured by APHAB ( Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit) score
時間枠:day 0, and 2, 3, 5, 8 and 14 months.
Changes will be described in both groups. APHAB questionnaire is validated in subjects deaf to assess the discomfort associated with deafness in conditions of erveday life.
day 0, and 2, 3, 5, 8 and 14 months.
Change in the quality of life measured by SSQ (Speech Saptial Qualiteies) score
時間枠:day 0, and 2, 3, 5, 8 and 14 months.
Changes will be described in both groups. SSQ questionnaire evaluate the binaural hearing.
day 0, and 2, 3, 5, 8 and 14 months.

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始

2014年2月1日

一次修了 (実際)

2015年2月1日

研究の完了 (実際)

2015年8月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2016年7月20日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2016年7月22日

最初の投稿 (見積もり)

2016年7月27日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2017年8月22日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2017年8月17日

最終確認日

2016年7月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • 2011.679

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。