このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Postural Exercises in Women With Fibromyalgia

2018年4月3日 更新者:Marta Inglés de la Torre、University of Valencia

Study of the Effect of a Postural Exercise Program in Women With Fibromyalgia: a Randomized Clinical Trial

In the current study, the investigators aimed to study:

  • The proprioception status of patients with FMS.
  • The effectiveness of a postural exercise program in women with fibromyalgia for 8 weeks (2 sessions per week), compared to a low impact aerobic exercise program on different parameters, such as proprioception, balance, muscle strength, flexibility and joint range.

調査の概要

状態

完了

条件

介入・治療

詳細な説明

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a multisystemic disease, characterized by generalized chronic musculoskeletal pain. In addition, it is usually accompanied by fatigue, sleep disorders, morning stiffness, cognitive disorders, depression, anxiety and stress. Other common symptoms are back pain, headaches, irritable bowel, balance problems and deterioration of physical function.

It constitutes the second most common rheumatic 36 disorder after osteoarthritis, with a prevalence of 2.9% in Europe and a fivefold times greater incidence among women than men.

Patients with FMS have pain at specific pressure points known as "tender points", with increased sensitivity to painful stimuli (hyperalgesia) and a decreased pain threshold (allodynia), in the absence of abnormalities in the biological or imaging tests. These tender points constitute the basis of the most sensitive and specific criteria for the diagnosis of the disease, this is, the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology. Accordingly, women presenting at least 11 of 18 tender points are diagnosed with FMS.

The etiology of FMS remains unclear. However, the generalized hyperalgesia, widespread pain and spontaneous pain in FMS have been related to central changes, and many studies support a major role for central sensitization in the generation of the symptoms of FMS.

Since it is a chronic disease, the care of this type of patients represents a significant economic burden. They have great health care resource requirements in both direct medical care and indirect costs of staff absenteeism. For these reasons, it is considered a major problem with a great impact on the health system, and therefore more and more studies are being developed with the aim of better understanding the pathophysiology of this disease.

In general, the goal of the treatment should be to improve function. In this regard, some studies have demonstrated the efficacy of low-cost therapeutic measures, such as physical exercise programs, to improve FMS symptoms. Physical exercise has a direct effect on pain, joint and muscle stiffness, generalized sensitivity fatigue, cognitive function. Since there is no standard program, it is difficult to determine which exercise modality is most effective on FMS. Most studies focus on low-impact aerobic exercise performed between 60-70% of maximal heart rate two to three times a week.

On the other hand, it has been proposed that motor control problems, due mainly to an alteration of the central and peripheral system, are associated with muscle strength loss, motor or sensory deficits and suboptimal muscle coordination. The lack of balance may also be due to a disturbance in the perception or interpretation of auditory- vestibular signals. Therefore, postural stability training is recommended to stimulate the neuromuscular system and develop proprioceptive capacity aimed at improving motor control and postural balance among these patients. In this regard, it is important to note that FMS is associated with postural control and balance impairments, the latter being one of the 10 most debilitating symptoms, with a prevalence of 45%.

In the current study, the investigators aimed to study:

  • The proprioception status of patients with FMS.
  • The effectiveness of a postural exercise program in women with fibromyalgia for 8 weeks (2 sessions per week), compared to a low impact aerobic exercise program on different parameters, such as proprioception, balance, muscle strength, flexibility and joint range.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

54

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

      • Valencia、スペイン、46010
        • Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

30年~65年 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

はい

受講資格のある性別

女性

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged between 30 and 65 years.
  • Meeting ACR 2010 criteria for FMS.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical contraindication for physical activity.
  • Deafness or limited hearing.
  • Vestibular disorders that compromise balance.
  • Low vision or blindness.
  • Psychotic disorder or cognitive impairment.
  • Decompensation or changes in medication.
  • Surgical interventions in the last six months.
  • Rheumatic disease.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:階乗代入
  • マスキング:独身

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Experimental group 1
Low impact aerobic exercise group. 1hour, twice a week
The intervention will consist of working the muscles that are most affected by FMS through group exercises, which will be dynamic, fluid and aimed at improving functionality. Each session will consist of 60 minutes and will be divided into three parts: warm up (15 minutes); games, group dynamics and aerobics (30 minutes); and cool down with stretching for 15 minutes.
実験的:Experimental group 2
Postural exercises group. 1hour, twice a week
The intervention will consist of performing postural exercises in prone, supine, sitting and standing position, as well as in quadrupedia. Each session will consist of 60 minutes and will be divided into three parts: warm up (15 minutes); postural exercises (30 minutes); and cool down with stretching for 15 minutes.
介入なし:Control propriocepcion
No exercise, just proprioceptive control.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Proprioception
時間枠:8 weeks
Proprioception will be evaluated at baseline and at the end of the study possible differences between women with fibromyalgia and healthy women using an isokinetic device (BIODEX MULTI-JOINT SYSTEM - PRO). The following movements were analized: knee (flexion, extension), hip (flexion, extension, abduction, adduction), ankle (flexion, extension), shoulder (flexion, extension). Joint position sense for knee extension and shoulder flexion will be also performed.
8 weeks

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Balance
時間枠:8 weeks
Evaluated by the Berg Balance Scale. This consists of 14 items, in which static and dynamic balance is assessed. Subjects are asked to perform balance related tasks of varying difficulties (from standing up from a sitting position to monopedal standing). According to the ability to carry out the assessed activity, each task is scored on a 5-point scale (0= lowest level of function, 4= highest level of function). The final measure is the sum of all the scores (maximum=56 points) and higher scores are indicative of greater functional balance. This test has shown excellent intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.97) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.91).
8 weeks
Handgrip strength
時間枠:8 weeks
Grip strength will be measured by a Jamar Analogue Hand Dynamometer with participants seated, their elbow by their side and flexed to right angles, and a neutral wrist position. Subjects were verbally encouraged to produce their maximal grip strength (MGS). Three trials were recorded, consisting of a 3-second maximal contraction, with a 30-second rest period between each trial. The maximal value of the three reproducible trials for each hand was retained for analyses.
8 weeks
Joint range of motion
時間枠:8 weeks
Ranges of movement of different joints were evaluated by a goniometer and an inclinometer: Shoulder (flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal and external rotation), hip (flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal and external rotation), knee (flexion and extension), ankle (flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal rotation and external rotation), cervical spine (flexion, extension, rotations and inclinations). For the measurements, subjects were in underwear or wore comfortable clothes.
8 weeks
Pain
時間枠:8 weeks

Evaluated by the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). The MPQ includes 4 main measures:

  1. Pain location. On a drawing of the human body with both anterior and posterior sides, participants indicate the areas of their bodies that have pain. The number of pain sites is summed as in indicator of the sensory pain dimension.
  2. Pain intensity. From a list of 6 words, the patient selects the one best word describing the intensity of pain: 0 = none, 1= mild, 2 = discomforting, 3 = distressing, 4 = horrible and 5 = excruciating.
  3. Pain quality. Participants respond to the question, "What does your pain feel like?" by selecting from 78 descriptors in 20 subclasses. The quantitative data is summed to form the Pain Rating Index (PRI) (score 0 no pain- 78 worst possible pain).
  4. Pain pattern. Participants respond to the question, "How does your pain change with time?" by selecting from 9 words.
8 weeks
Leisure Time Physical Activity
時間枠:8 weeks
Evaluated by the Leisure Time Physical Activity Instrument (LTPAI). It is an instrument assessing the amount of physical activity performed during a typical week. The physical activities are divided into three categories: light, moderate, and heavy activities. The LTPAI total score is the sum of hours in all three categories.
8 weeks
Impact on quality of life
時間枠:8 weeks
Evaluated by the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). This is a multidimensional self-administered questionnaire with 10 items that evaluates the status of the patient the week before the test is completed, and it assesses the aspects that tend to be more affected in people with FMS. The first item contains 10 sub-items, ranging from four points (from 0= always to 3 = never) and assesses the patient's functional capacity in activities of daily living. The second and third items refer to days of the week and the rest are visual analog scales from 0 to 10. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the maximal functional capacity quality of life and 100 the minimum. This scale was validated in its Spanish version by Salgueiro and García-Leiva in 2013, and it showed an excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95).
8 weeks
Anxiety and Depression
時間枠:8 weeks
Assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). This is a valid and reliable self-rating scale with 14 items that measures anxiety and depression (7 of the items relate to anxiety and 7 relate to depression). Each item is answered by the patient on a four point (0-3) response category so the possible scores range from 0 to 21 for anxiety and 0 to 21 for depression, with scores categorized as follows: normal 0-7, mild 8-10, moderate 11-14, and severe 15-21. Scores for the entire scale (emotional distress) range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating more distress.
8 weeks
Fatigue
時間枠:8 weeks
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). The FSS is a self-administered questionnaire with 9 items (questions) investigating the severity of fatigue in different situations during the past week. Grading of each item ranges from 1 to 7, where 1 indicates strong disagreement and 7 strong agreement, and the final score represents the mean value of the 9 items.
8 weeks
Sleep disorders
時間枠:8 weeks
Evaluated by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). It is a self-report questionnaire that assesses sleep quality over a 1-month time interval. The measure consists of 19 individual items, creating 7 components that produce one global score. Each item is weighted on a 0-3 interval scale. The global PSQI score is then calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality.
8 weeks

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Marta Inglés, PhD、Faculty of Physiotherapy. University of Valencia

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2017年9月4日

一次修了 (実際)

2017年11月10日

研究の完了 (実際)

2017年12月29日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2017年5月23日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2017年5月23日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2017年5月25日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2018年4月4日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2018年4月3日

最終確認日

2018年4月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • H1484818368873

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

類似の治験を検索