Telemedicine Enabling Patients in Self-care Behaviors
調査の概要
状態
状態
条件
条件
介入・治療
介入・治療
詳細な説明
Study will utilize the Telemedicine group and the Standard Visit group (30 patients each group) to determine
Endpoints:
- Time of recognition, time of diagnosis and time of intervention for arrhythmia. These times will be noted for each patient in each group and look for any difference in these times based upon gaining information from telemedicine visits versus 6 month follow up visit.
- Three surveys of patient Self efficacy of medications, activity, and arrhythmia knowledge utilizing three surveys in each group. Surveys will be answered at the start of the study and end of the study by every patient within each group.
Surveys:
MUSE- Medication Understanding and Self Efficacy Tool Shortened FSES- Functioning self efficacy scale ASTA- Arrhythmia specific symptoms and health related quality of life in connection with heart rhythm disturbance
研究の種類
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
入学
段階
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor、Michigan、アメリカ、48109
- University of Michigan
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Read and speak English
- 18 years of age or older
- Have a cardiac arrhythmia diagnosis
- Are willing to participate in the study and answer a pre and post survey.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any difficulty in understanding the study
- Does not have internet or a cell phone data plan
- Any life threatening arrhythmias
- Objection to working with nurse practitioners and physician assistants
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:ヘルスサービス研究
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)
アーム数
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
アクティブコンパレータ:Standard of care group
Discuss new arrhythmias, review symptoms, discuss methods to help symptoms, questions and answers, monitor devices every 3 months
|
Visits every 6 months is standard of care.
他の名前:
|
|
実験的:Telemedicine group
Discuss new arrhythmias, review symptoms, discuss methods to help symptoms, questions and answers, monitor devices every 3 months
|
Conduct monthly telemedicine 'skype' visit
Review details of medication indication and use, activity recommendations and changes, and knowledge of arrhythmia changes and activities which are helpful with arrhythmia changes.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Time of recognition of an arrhythmia
時間枠:Up to 6 months
|
Patient recognition of a probable arrhythmia
|
Up to 6 months
|
|
Time of diagnosis of arrhythmia
時間枠:Up to 6 months
|
Time of diagnosis of arrhythmia by medical staff- at what point is the diagnosis present.
|
Up to 6 months
|
|
Time to treatment initiation of arrhythmia
時間枠:Up to 6 months
|
The time- what point in time is the treatment plan innitiated
|
Up to 6 months
|
二次結果の測定
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in self efficacy in medication use score as measured by the Medication Self Efficacy Tool (MUSE) survey
時間枠:Baseline, 6 months
|
MUSE is 7 items which are evaluated to identify if the patient has a good overall understanding and perception of their medicine.
|
Baseline, 6 months
|
|
Change in functioning self efficacy score as measured by the 13 Item Shortened Function Self-efficacy Scale (FSES)
時間枠:Baseline, 6 months
|
The FSES is 13 questions with responses scored from 1 to 5 with a maximum score of 65.
Higher scores indicates higher level of functioning.
|
Baseline, 6 months
|
|
Change in self-efficacy of arrhythmia management score as measured by the Arrhythmia-Specific questionnaire in Tachycardia and Arrhythmias (ASTA) survey
時間枠:Baseline, 6 months
|
The ASTA questionnaire is divided into three separate parts.
|
Baseline, 6 months
|
協力者と研究者
捜査官
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Kathleen Fasing、University of Michigan
- スタディチェア:Hakan Oral, MD、University of Michigan
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Varma N, Epstein AE, Irimpen A, Schweikert R, Love C; TRUST Investigators. Efficacy and safety of automatic remote monitoring for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-up (TRUST) trial. Circulation. 2010 Jul 27;122(4):325-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.937409. Epub 2010 Jul 12.
- Harden M, Nystrom B, Kulich K, Carlsson J, Bengtson A, Edvardsson N. Validity and reliability of a new, short symptom rating scale in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Jul 15;7:65. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-65.
- Anderson, T, Bansler, J., Kensing, F. & Moll, J., Aligning concerns in telecare: Three concepts to guide the design of patient centered e-health, Computer supported cooperative work, 3 (6), 1181-1214, 2018.
- Dalouk K, Gandhi N, Jessel P, MacMurdy K, Zarraga IG, Lasarev M, Raitt M. Outcomes of Telemedicine Video-Conferencing Clinic Versus In-Person Clinic Follow-Up for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Recipients. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Sep;10(9):e005217. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005217.
- Dixon DL, Dunn SP, Kelly MS, McLlarky TR, Brown RE. Effectiveness of Pharmacist-Led Amiodarone Monitoring Services on Improving Adherence to Amiodarone Monitoring Recommendations: A Systematic Review. Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Feb;36(2):230-6. doi: 10.1002/phar.1697. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
- Estrada JC, Darbar D. Clinical use of and future perspectives on antiarrhythmic drugs. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Dec;64(12):1139-46. doi: 10.1007/s00228-008-0555-x. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
- Goldschlager N, Epstein AE, Naccarelli GV, Olshansky B, Singh B, Collard HR, Murphy E; Practice Guidelines Sub-committee, North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (HRS). A practical guide for clinicians who treat patients with amiodarone: 2007. Heart Rhythm. 2007 Sep;4(9):1250-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.07.020. Epub 2007 Jul 20. Erratum In: Heart Rhythm. 2007 Dec;4(12):1590.
- Honeyman, E., Ding, H., Varnfield, M., & Karunanithi, M. Mobile health applications in cardiac care. Interventional cardiology, 6.2, 227-241, 2014.
- Klein-Wiele O, Faghih M, Dreesen S, Urbien R, Abdelghafor M, Kara K, Schulte-Hermes M, Garmer M, Gronemeyer D, Hailer B. A novel cross-sector telemedical approach to detect arrhythmia in primary care patients with palpitations using a patient-activated event recorder. Cardiol J. 2016;23(4):422-8. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2016.0033. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
- Lamarche L, Tejpal A, Mangin D. Self-efficacy for medication management: a systematic review of instruments. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Jul 20;12:1279-1287. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S165749. eCollection 2018.
- Lowres N, Redfern J, Freedman SB, Orchard J, Bennett AA, Briffa T, Bauman A, Neubeck L. Choice of Health Options In prevention of Cardiovascular Events for people with Atrial Fibrillation (CHOICE-AF): A pilot study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Feb;15(1):39-46. doi: 10.1177/1474515114549687. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
- Lopez-Villegas A, Catalan-Matamoros D, Robles-Musso E, Peiro S. Effectiveness of pacemaker tele-monitoring on quality of life, functional capacity, event detection and workload: The PONIENTE trial. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016 Nov;16(11):1188-1195. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12612. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
- Ryan P. Integrated Theory of Health Behavior Change: background and intervention development. Clin Nurse Spec. 2009 May-Jun;23(3):161-70; quiz 171-2. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0b013e3181a42373.
- Ryan P, Papanek P, Csuka ME, Brown ME, Hopkins S, Lynch S, Scheer V, Schlidt A, Yan K, Simpson P, Hoffman R; Striving to be Strong Team. Background and method of the Striving to be Strong study a RCT testing the efficacy of a m-health self-management intervention. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Aug;71:80-87. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 9.
- Suter P, Suter WN, Johnston D. Theory-based telehealth and patient empowerment. Popul Health Manag. 2011 Apr;14(2):87-92. doi: 10.1089/pop.2010.0013. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
- Sutton, B. D'Oranzio, Gopinethannair, R. Developing a robust monitoring program in your practice: Clinical, economic, and workflow considerations. Electrophysiology Lab Digest, 13 (2), 2013.
- Tarakji, K. For arrhythmia patients, virtual visits hold plenty of virtues. Electrophysiology consult QD, 12 (2), 2016.
- Tovel H, Carmel S. Function Self-Efficacy Scale-FSES: Development, Evaluation, and Contribution to Well-Being. Res Aging. 2016 Aug;38(6):643-64. doi: 10.1177/0164027515596583. Epub 2015 Aug 2.
- Varma N, Ricci RP. Telemedicine and cardiac implants: what is the benefit? Eur Heart J. 2013 Jul;34(25):1885-95. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs388. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
- Walfridsson, Ulla. ASTA, University Hospital, Linkoping, Sweeden, 2012.
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
研究開始
一次修了 (実際)
一次修了
研究の完了 (実際)
研究の完了
試験登録日
最初に提出
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
最初の投稿
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
投稿された最後の更新
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
その他の研究ID番号
- HUM00156966
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。