Migraine Headaches Elimination With Patent Foramen Ovale-Directed Therapy (COMFORT-PFO)
Cessation of Migraine Headaches With Patent Foramen Ovale-Directed Therapy (COMFORT - PFO): An Investigator-Initiated Study
Migraine is a common and often disabling condition, but its exact causes are not fully understood. Some people with migraines have a small opening in the heart wall called a patent foramen ovale (PFO). In some of these patients, closing this opening or taking a medication that inhibits blood platelets (prasugrel) has been shown to reduce migraines. However, not everyone benefits, and it is unclear why. This study is being done to better understand whether closing a PFO can provide lasting migraine relief - especially in patients whose migraines improve with prasugrel.
The goal of this study is to find out whether, in patients whose migraines improve while taking prasugrel, closing the PFO along with 24 weeks of prasugrel leads to better long-term migraine relief after stopping the medication, than by taking prasugrel for 24 weeks alone.
Participants will track their migraines daily using an electronic diary, then take prasugrel and compare their migraines while on the medication. Only patients whose migraines improve on this medication will continue in the study. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) to one of two groups: 1) Medication-only group: Continue prasugrel for 24 weeks. 2) Procedure group: Undergo a minimally invasive procedure to close the PFO and continue prasugrel for 24 weeks. After treatment, the medication will be stopped in both groups, and participants will again track their migraines for about 8 weeks.
The main question is: Do patients who have PFO closure continue to have fewer migraines after stopping prasugrel compared with those who did not have the procedure?
調査の概要
状態
状態
条件
条件
介入・治療
介入・治療
詳細な説明
The hypothesis of the COMFORT-PFO Study is that a subset of migraine patients with PFO have an underlying platelet-mediated migraine mechanism in which byproducts of platelet activation or aggregation enter the cerebral circulation via the PFO at supraphysiologic levels, thereby triggering migraine.
Inhibition of platelet activity with thienopyridine therapy is expected to reduce the generation of these byproducts in the systemic venous circulation and, consequently, their passage to the cerebral circulation. Similarly, transcatheter closure of the PFO eliminates the right-to-left pathway, resulting in reduced exposure of the brain to these platelet-derived factors. In this context, a response to thienopyridine therapy may serve as a clinical marker to identify patients in whom the PFO plays a mechanistic role in migraine pathophysiology.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether the clinical benefit in migraine reduction observed during initial thienopyridine therapy is maintained after treatment withdrawal, comparing subjects assigned to transcatheter PFO closure with those managed with medical therapy alone. Thienopyridine-responsiveness will be assessed using prasugrel hydrochloride in this study.
研究の種類
研究の種類
入学 (推定)
入学
段階
段階
- フェーズ 3
連絡先と場所
研究連絡先
研究連絡先
- 名前:Robert J Sommer, MD
- 電話番号:212-342-0886
- メール:rs2463@cumc.columbia.edu
研究連絡先のバックアップ
- 名前:Barbara T Robbins, FNP-BC
- 電話番号:212-342-0886
- メール:bs2575@cumc.columbia.edu
研究場所
-
-
New York
-
New York、New York、アメリカ、10032
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center - NewYork Presbyterian Hospital (CUIMC/NYP)
-
コンタクト:
- Robert J Sommer, MD
- 電話番号:2123420886
- メール:rs2463@cumc.columbia.edu
-
コンタクト:
- Barbara T Robbins, FNP-BC
- 電話番号:2123420886
- メール:bs2575@cumc.columbia.edu
-
主任研究者:
- Robert J Sommer, MD
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
説明
Patient Inclusion Criteria:
- Age: ≥18 and <55 at time of screening
- Migraine headache with aura, or migraine headache without aura, fulfilling conditions of the Neurology Screening Tool (meeting ICHD-3 criteria)
- Diagnosis of migraine for ≥ 1 year; onset of migraine symptoms < 40 years of age
- By history, an average headache burden of greater than one migraine headache day per week:
- without current preventative therapy, OR
- despite preventative therapy, OR
- with reason to come off effective therapy (e.g. cost, aversion to injections, side effects)
- If patient is taking preventive migraine medications, dose must be stable for at least 3 months prior to the screening visit. Patient agrees to continue preventive medication at the current dosage throughout the duration of the Baseline and On-treatment monitoring periods (Study Weeks 1 - 17).
- Female patients capable of becoming pregnant agree to use two forms of birth control or abstinence during their participation in the study.
Patient Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusions due to underlying patient medical issues:
- Headache disorder other than migraine with aura, or migraine without aura
- Patient has history of stroke, TIA, or intracranial hemorrhage.
- Patient has a history of thrombocytopenia within one year, or platelet count <100,000/mm3 identified during the screening laboratory evaluation.
- Patient has severe hepatic impairment with reduced synthetic function as documented by prolongation of PT/PTT, or with total bilirubin >3.0 mg/dL identified during the screening laboratory evaluation.
- Patient has previously implanted pacemaker, IVC filter, PFO closure device, ASD closure device, or left atrial appendage closure device or any cardiac history which, in the investigator's opinion, would preclude them from study participation.
- Patient has documented right-to-left shunt source in addition to PFO such as atrial septal defect or pulmonary arteriovenous malformation.
- Patient has a history of clinically significant bleeding within 6 months of the screening visit, any active bleeding, or active peptic ulcer disease.
- Patient has an uncontrolled arrhythmia, or if on therapy, has evidence of arrhythmia control failure within the past 90 days (e.g., supraventricular tachycardia or atrial fibrillation while under rhythm control).
- Patient has elevated PVR which in the opinion of the implanting physician precludes safe PFO closure.
- Patient has active infection at the time of screening that cannot be treated.
- Patient is planning surgery during the study timeframe.
- A female patient is pregnant or is planning pregnancy during the anticipated duration of the study. Urine or blood pregnancy screening will be performed as part of the screening laboratory evaluation.
- Patient has documented nickel allergy/sensitivity
- Patient has a documented history of non-compliance with medical care, which would preclude them, in the opinion of the study team
Exclusion Due to Medication Restrictions:
- Patient has known hypersensitivity or contraindication to thienopyridines
- Patient has another medical condition requiring chronic antithrombotic therapy with antiplatelet, oral anticoagulant or injectable agents
- Patient has need for daily use of NSAIDs other than for treatment of migraines
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:防止
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)
アーム数
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
アクティブコンパレータ:Group A - Thienopyridine only
16 patients will be randomized to this group.
Thienopyridine medication (prasugrel) which was demonstrated to reduce headache frequency during study screening phases, will be continued for 6 months and then stopped.
Post-therapy headache frequency will be compared with the patient's baseline headache frequency.
After completion of the study procedures, patients in this group will be given the opportunity to get the PFO closure procedure.
|
Six months of daily prasugrel therapy following randomization.
他の名前:
|
|
アクティブコンパレータ:Group B - PFO closure plus thienopyridine
16 patients will be randomized to this group.
After demonstrating thienopyridine (prasugrel) benefit for migraine symptoms in the screening phases of the study, patients in this arm will undergo PFO closure, a non-surgical outpatient catheter procedure.
They will remain on prasugrel for an additional 6 months.
The medication will then be stopped.
Post-therapy headache frequency will be compared with the patient's baseline headache frequency.
|
Six months of daily prasugrel therapy following randomization.
他の名前:
A standard transcatheter closure of PFO will be performed in the Group B cohort.
During this non-surgical procedure, the GORE Cardioform Septal Occluder will be used to close the PFO (it is FDA-approved for exactly this purpose for prevention of recurrent stroke) but will be used here in an off-label fashion.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Reduction in Monthly Migraine Days (MMD)
時間枠:upon completion of the 56-day Post-Therapy monitoring session
|
The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of randomized subjects maintaining a clinically meaningful migraine response, defined as a ≥50% reduction in Monthly Migraine Days (MMD) in the Post-Therapy monitoring session, compared with the Baseline monitoring session (following discontinuation of prasugrel).
|
upon completion of the 56-day Post-Therapy monitoring session
|
二次結果の測定
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Effect Persistence (EP)
時間枠:upon completion of the 56-day Post-Therapy monitoring session
|
Effect Preservation (EP) is a constructed metric which defines the extent to which the clinical benefit of migraine reduction observed during thienopyridine therapy is maintained following discontinuation of therapy. EP is calculated for each randomized subject as the proportion of the On-Therapy reduction in Monthly Migraine Days (MMD) that is preserved during the Post-Therapy period, expressed as a percentage. For each subject, EP is defined as: EP = (Post-Therapy Reduction in MMD / On-Therapy Reduction in MMD) × 100 where: Post-Therapy Reduction in MMD = Baseline MMD - Post-Therapy MMD On-Therapy Reduction in MMD = Baseline MMD - On-Therapy MMD EP provides a continuous, subject-level measure of treatment durability, allowing comparison of the extent to which the initial treatment effect is maintained following therapy discontinuation. |
upon completion of the 56-day Post-Therapy monitoring session
|
|
Responder-based Endpoints
時間枠:upon completion of the 56-day Post-Therapy monitoring session
|
Responder-based endpoints will assess higher thresholds of clinical response and will include the proportion of subjects achieving:
|
upon completion of the 56-day Post-Therapy monitoring session
|
|
Absolute reduction in MMD from Baseline to Post-Therapy
時間枠:upon completion of the 56-day Post-Therapy monitoring session
|
This measure will calculate the absolute difference in MMD between the Baseline monitoring session and the Post-Therapy monitoring session.
|
upon completion of the 56-day Post-Therapy monitoring session
|
|
Percent reduction in MMD from Baseline to Post-Therapy
時間枠:upon completion of the 56-day Post-Therapy monitoring session
|
This measure will assess the percentage difference in MMD between the Baseline monitoring session and the Post-Therapy session.
|
upon completion of the 56-day Post-Therapy monitoring session
|
|
Change in MSQ 2.1 Score (Baseline Score - Post-thienopyridine Score)
時間枠:Baseline and upon completion of the 56-day Post-Therapy monitoring session
|
The Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Version 2.1 is a 14-item patient-reported questionnaire to evaluate the impact of migraines on a patient's quality of life across 3 domains: Role Function-Restrictive (measures how migraines limit daily, social, and work-related activities), Role Function-Preventive (measures how migraines prevent these daily activities from happening altogether), and Emotional Function (assesses the emotional toll, frustration, and helplessness caused by migraines).
In this modified version, the minimum score is 0, and the maximum score is 70, with each answer to the 14 questions receiving from 0 to 5 points.
The cumulative score will be assessed at Baseline and after Treatment.
The lower the score, the better Quality of Life.
The absolute difference in the cumulative score will be compared, with a reduction from baseline indicating an improvement in quality of life.
|
Baseline and upon completion of the 56-day Post-Therapy monitoring session
|
|
Change in HIT-6 Score (Baseline Score - Post-thienopyridine Score)
時間枠:Baseline and upon completion of the 56-day Post-Therapy monitoring session
|
The HIT-6 (Headache Impact Test) is a 6-item patient-reported questionnaire that measures how severely headaches impact daily life, social functioning, and ability to concentrate.
Scores range from 36 to 78, with higher numbers indicating greater headache-related disability.
This measure will assess the difference from the Baseline (at enrollment) HIT-6 score, to the HIT-6 score after completion of the Post-Therapy monitoring session.
A decrease in the HIT-6 score reflects a reduction of the life impact imposed by migraines.
|
Baseline and upon completion of the 56-day Post-Therapy monitoring session
|
協力者と研究者
協力者
協力者
捜査官
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Robert J Sommer, MD、Columbia University
- 主任研究者:Jessica Ailani, MD、MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Saver JL, Carroll JD, Thaler DE, Smalling RW, MacDonald LA, Marks DS, Tirschwell DL; RESPECT Investigators. Long-Term Outcomes of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Medical Therapy after Stroke. N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 14;377(11):1022-1032. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610057.
- Kent DM, Saver JL, Kasner SE, Nelson J, Carroll JD, Chatellier G, Derumeaux G, Furlan AJ, Herrmann HC, Juni P, Kim JS, Koethe B, Lee PH, Lefebvre B, Mattle HP, Meier B, Reisman M, Smalling RW, Soendergaard L, Song JK, Mas JL, Thaler DE. Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects in an Analysis of Pooled Individual Patient Data From Randomized Trials of Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale After Stroke. JAMA. 2021 Dec 14;326(22):2277-2286. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.20956.
- Trabattoni D, Brambilla M, Canzano P, Becchetti A, Teruzzi G, Porro B, Fiorelli S, Muratori M, Tedesco CC, Veglia F, Montorsi P, Bartorelli AL, Tremoli E, Camera M. Migraine in Patients Undergoing PFO Closure: Characterization of a Platelet-Associated Pathophysiological Mechanism: The LEARNER Study. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2022 Apr 13;7(6):525-540. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2022.02.002. eCollection 2022 Jun.
- Sondergaard L, Kasner SE, Rhodes JF, Andersen G, Iversen HK, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Settergren M, Sjostrand C, Roine RO, Hildick-Smith D, Spence JD, Thomassen L; Gore REDUCE Clinical Study Investigators. Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke. N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 14;377(11):1033-1042. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707404.
- Wilmshurst PT, Nightingale S, Walsh KP, Morrison WL. Effect on migraine of closure of cardiac right-to-left shunts to prevent recurrence of decompression illness or stroke or for haemodynamic reasons. Lancet. 2000 Nov 11;356(9242):1648-51. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03160-3.
- Schwerzmann M, Wiher S, Nedeltchev K, Mattle HP, Wahl A, Seiler C, Meier B, Windecker S. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale reduces the frequency of migraine attacks. Neurology. 2004 Apr 27;62(8):1399-401. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000120677.64217.a9.
- Giardini A, Donti A, Formigari R, Salomone L, Palareti G, Guidetti D, Picchio FM. Long-term efficacy of transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure on migraine headache with aura and recurrent stroke. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Apr;67(4):625-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20699.
- Reisman M, Christofferson RD, Jesurum J, Olsen JV, Spencer MP, Krabill KA, Diehl L, Aurora S, Gray WA. Migraine headache relief after transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Feb 15;45(4):493-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.10.055.
- Slavin L, Tobis JM, Rangarajan K, Dao C, Krivokapich J, Liebeskind DS. Five-year experience with percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale. Am J Cardiol. 2007 May 1;99(9):1316-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.12.054. Epub 2007 Mar 20.
- Kimmelstiel C, Gange C, Thaler D. Is patent foramen ovale closure effective in reducing migraine symptoms? A controlled study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Apr 1;69(5):740-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21025.
- Wahl A, Praz F, Tai T, Findling O, Walpoth N, Nedeltchev K, Schwerzmann M, Windecker S, Mattle HP, Meier B. Improvement of migraine headaches after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale for secondary prevention of paradoxical embolism. Heart. 2010 Jun;96(12):967-73. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.181156.
- Dowson A, Mullen MJ, Peatfield R, Muir K, Khan AA, Wells C, Lipscombe SL, Rees T, De Giovanni JV, Morrison WL, Hildick-Smith D, Elrington G, Hillis WS, Malik IS, Rickards A. Migraine Intervention With STARFlex Technology (MIST) trial: a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, sham-controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of patent foramen ovale closure with STARFlex septal repair implant to resolve refractory migraine headache. Circulation. 2008 Mar 18;117(11):1397-404. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.727271. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
- Mattle HP, Evers S, Hildick-Smith D, Becker WJ, Baumgartner H, Chataway J, Gawel M, Gobel H, Heinze A, Horlick E, Malik I, Ray S, Zermansky A, Findling O, Windecker S, Meier B. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in migraine with aura, a randomized controlled trial. Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 7;37(26):2029-36. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw027. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
- Tobis JM, Charles A, Silberstein SD, Sorensen S, Maini B, Horwitz PA, Gurley JC. Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients With Migraine: The PREMIUM Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 5;70(22):2766-2774. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1105.
- 11. The ESCAPE Migraine Trial: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00267371?cond=Migraine%20Headache&intr=PFO%20Closure&page=2&rank=15
- Kent DM, Thaler DE; RoPE Study Investigators. The Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) Study: developing risk models for application to ongoing randomized trials of percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure for cryptogenic stroke. Trials. 2011 Jul 27;12:185. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-185.
- Rodes-Cabau J, Horlick E, Ibrahim R, Cheema AN, Labinaz M, Nadeem N, Osten M, Cote M, Marsal JR, Rivest D, Marrero A, Houde C. Effect of Clopidogrel and Aspirin vs Aspirin Alone on Migraine Headaches After Transcatheter Atrial Septal Defect Closure: The CANOA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Nov 24;314(20):2147-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13919.
- 20. RELIEF Trial: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04100135?cond=Migraine%20Headache&term=relief%20clinical%20study&rank=1.
- Safiri S, Pourfathi H, Eagan A, Mansournia MA, Khodayari MT, Sullman MJM, Kaufman J, Collins G, Dai H, Bragazzi NL, Kolahi AA. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine in 204 countries and territories, 1990 to 2019. Pain. 2022 Feb 1;163(2):e293-e309. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002275.
- Charleston L 4th, Royce J, Monteith TS, Broner SW, O'Brien HL, Manrriquez SL, Robbins MS. Migraine Care Challenges and Strategies in US Uninsured and Underinsured Adults: A Narrative Review, Part 1. Headache. 2018 Apr;58(4):506-511. doi: 10.1111/head.13286. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
- Spencer BT, Qureshi Y, Sommer RJ. A retrospective review of clopidogrel as primary therapy for migraineurs with right to left shunt lesions. Cephalalgia. 2014 Oct;34(11):933-7. doi: 10.1177/0333102414523845. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
- Reisman AM, Robbins BT, Chou DE, Yugrakh MS, Gross GJ, Privitera L, Nazif T, Sommer RJ. Ticagrelor for Refractory Migraine/Patent Foramen Ovale (TRACTOR): An open-label pilot study. Neurology. 2018 Nov 27;91(22):1010-1017. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006573.
- Sommer RJ, Robbins BT. Migraine Headache and Patent Foramen Ovale: Observational Studies, the Randomized Clinical Trials, and the GORE RELIEF Clinical Study. Cardiol Clin. 2024 Nov;42(4):497-507. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2024.01.007. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
- Sommer RJ, Nazif T, Privitera L, Robbins BT. Retrospective review of thienopyridine therapy in migraineurs with patent foramen ovale. Neurology. 2018 Nov 27;91(22):1002-1009. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006572.
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (推定)
研究開始
一次修了 (推定)
一次修了
研究の完了 (推定)
研究の完了
試験登録日
最初に提出
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
最初の投稿
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
投稿された最後の更新
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
追加の関連 MeSH 用語
その他の研究ID番号
その他の研究ID番号
- ACYY2573
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
IPD プランの説明
IPD 共有時間枠
IPD 共有アクセス基準
IPD 共有サポート情報タイプ
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。