Acceleromyography Versus Electromyography for Neuromuscular Recovery Assessment at the End of Surgery
Concordance Between Acceleromyography and Electromyography for Assessment of Neuromuscular Recovery at the End of Surgery
調査の概要
状態
状態
条件
条件
介入・治療
介入・治療
詳細な説明
Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring is recommended to reduce the incidence of residual neuromuscular blockade and its associated postoperative complications. Although electromyography is considered the current clinical reference method for objective neuromuscular monitoring, acceleromyography remains the most commonly used technique in routine clinical practice because of its availability, lower cost, and ease of use. However, acceleromyography may overestimate neuromuscular recovery, particularly when baseline normalization is not performed.
This prospective observational diagnostic agreement study will enroll adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia requiring administration of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents. At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents, simultaneous train-of-four (TOF) ratio measurements will be obtained using acceleromyography and electromyography. Acceleromyography will be performed according to routine clinical practice without baseline normalization, while electromyography will serve as the reference method.
The primary objective is to evaluate the agreement between acceleromyography and electromyography measurements obtained at the end of surgery. Secondary objectives include estimating the mean bias between methods, calculating the 95% limits of agreement using Bland-Altman analysis, evaluating proportional bias, and determining the proportion of patients in whom acceleromyography indicates adequate neuromuscular recovery (TOF ≥0.9) while electromyography demonstrates residual neuromuscular blockade (TOF <0.9).
Demographic, clinical, and anesthetic variables will also be collected. Approximately 70 participants are expected to be enrolled.
研究の種類
研究の種類
入学 (推定)
入学
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Santiago Metropolitan
-
Santiago、Santiago Metropolitan、チリ、8431657
- Clínica Dávila
-
コンタクト:
- Alejandra Rivera, MsC Epidemiology
- 電話番号:930363776
- メール:alejandra.rivera@davila.cl
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
サンプリング方法
調査対象母集団
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged 18 years or older.
- Scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia.
- Administration of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents.
- Written informed consent provided.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pre-existing neuromuscular disease.
- Upper extremity abnormalities preventing neuromuscular monitoring.
- Contraindications to neuromuscular monitoring.
- Refusal or inability to provide informed consent.
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
グループ/コホートの数
コホートと介入
グループ/コホートグループ/コホート |
介入・治療介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
Adults Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia with non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade.
Simultaneous train-of-four (TOF) ratio measurements will be obtained at the end of surgery using acceleromyography and electromyography before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents.
|
Simultaneous quantitative neuromuscular monitoring using acceleromyography and electromyography to measure the train-of-four (TOF) ratio at the end of surgery before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Agreement Between Acceleromyography and Electromyography Train-of-Four Ratios
時間枠:At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
|
Agreement between the train-of-four (TOF) ratios measured simultaneously by acceleromyography and electromyography at the end of surgery.
Agreement between the two measurement methods will be evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis.
|
At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
|
二次結果の測定
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Bias Between Acceleromyography and Electromyography TOF Ratios
時間枠:At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
|
Mean difference between the TOF ratio measured by acceleromyography and the TOF ratio measured by electromyography.
|
At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
|
|
Ninety-Five Percent Limits of Agreement Between TOF Monitoring Methods
時間枠:At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
|
Upper and lower 95% limits of agreement for the difference between acceleromyography and electromyography TOF ratio measurements, calculated using Bland-Altman analysis.
|
At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
|
|
Proportional Bias Between Acceleromyography and Electromyography TOF Ratios
時間枠:At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
|
Presence and magnitude of proportional bias between the two monitoring methods, evaluated by assessing the relationship between the difference in TOF ratios and the mean TOF ratio obtained by acceleromyography and electromyography.
|
At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
|
|
Proportion of Participants With False Neuromuscular Recovery Indicated by Acceleromyography
時間枠:At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
|
Proportion of participants in whom acceleromyography indicates adequate neuromuscular recovery, defined as a TOF ratio greater than or equal to 0.90, while electromyography indicates residual neuromuscular blockade, defined as a TOF ratio below 0.90.
|
At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
|
協力者と研究者
捜査官
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Dagoberto Ojeda, MD、Clínica Dávila
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (推定)
研究開始
一次修了 (推定)
一次修了
研究の完了 (推定)
研究の完了
試験登録日
最初に提出
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
最初の投稿
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
投稿された最後の更新
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
キーワード
追加の関連 MeSH 用語
その他の研究ID番号
その他の研究ID番号
- CD2026/16
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
IPD プランの説明
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。