Non-Invasive Shock: Differentiating Shock in the Emergency Department (NIS)
調査の概要
詳細な説明
Shock is a common final pathway for many disease states, occurring when oxygen and nutrient delivery are not sufficient to maintain normal cellular function. The incidence of shock in the emergency department (ED) is approximated to be 1-3% of ED patients(1), and it carries a high mortality, ranging from 20-50% depending on the underlying cause of shock(2). Early recognition and treatment of shock significantly improves outcomes in critically ill patients(2, 3), and so the majority of efforts to this point have focused on identifying patients with shock.
The many etiologies of shock may be grouped into several broader categories: cardiogenic, distributive, hemorrhagic, hypovolemic, anaphylactic, and neurogenic. These categories cause shock through different mechanisms, but they have a significant amount of clinical overlap (4-7), making differentiating the cause of shock challenging for the emergency provider. While some overlap also exists between the treatments for these categories, several have vastly different therapeutic approaches. Since the early treatment of shock influences outcomes(2, 3, 8, 9), identifying the correct etiology to treat should logically impact outcomes as well, although this has not been studied in shock patients. However, Moore, et al., did show that physicians were only able to correctly identify the cause of hypotension in 25% of hypotensive patients in the ED, speaking to both the difficulty in diagnosing shock etiologies and the high percentage of patients with undifferentiated shock(10).
Recently, a number of different devices and biomarkers have been suggested to have clinical utility in differentiating shock and guiding resuscitation(11-13). These devices have potential to aid in the differentiation of shock.
We will conduct a prospective, observational study of patients found to have shock and "near-shock" physiology in the emergency department. We will identify patients meeting our inclusion criteria which will identify shock and "near shock" patients. Inclusion criteria will include: HR > 120, SBP < 90, or a shock index (HR/SBP) > 1 for at least five minutes. Patients that do meet vital sign requirements, but have a lactate > 4 mmol/L, will also be included.
Enrolled patients will undergo physiologic assessments using echocardiography, Microscan, Non-invasive cardiac output monitor (NICOM), and extremity temperature device, as well as a blood draw for biomarker assessment.
研究の種類
入学 (予想される)
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston、Massachusetts、アメリカ、02215
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
サンプリング方法
調査対象母集団
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years old
- determined to have shock physiology, which will be defined by vital sign requirements including SBP < 90 despite appropriate resuscitation (e.g 2 L of normal saline) for at least five minutes.
- Patients that do meet vital sign requirements and vasopressor initiation will also be included
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients determined to have atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response or supraventricular tachycardia, and the patient is discharged when the ventricular rate is corrected.
- Patients will also be excluded if found to have to alcohol withdrawal, intoxication, or psychiatric agitation without organic cause.
- Patients with SBP < 90 mm/hg who have been documented to have chronic low blood pressure and their blood pressure is at baseline
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
---|---|---|
Deterioration
時間枠:This measure will be assessed at the time of physician review after discharge from hospital, on average 2 months after initial ED visit.
|
Composite in hospital endpoint: 1) acute renal failure (Creatinine 2x baseline or new hemodialysis), non-elective intubation, vasopressor requirement, mortality.
|
This measure will be assessed at the time of physician review after discharge from hospital, on average 2 months after initial ED visit.
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
---|---|---|
Mortality
時間枠:This measure will be assessed at the time of physician review after discharge from hospital, on average 2 months after initial ED visit.
|
In-hospital mortality.
|
This measure will be assessed at the time of physician review after discharge from hospital, on average 2 months after initial ED visit.
|
協力者と研究者
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (予想される)
研究の完了 (予想される)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (見積もり)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。