このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

気管内チューブとプロシール ラリンジアル マスク エアウェイによる換気のための麻酔要件の比較

2026年11月11日 更新者:Nitin Sethi, DNB、Sir Ganga Ram Hospital

腹腔鏡下胆嚢摘出術を受ける患者における自動フィードバックループ制御全静脈麻酔中の気管内チューブ対 ProSeal ラリンジアルマスク気道による換気の麻酔要件:無作為化対照研究

Endotracheal tube (ETT) is the gold standard conduit for providing controlled ventilation during general anaesthesia (GA). however, the supra-glottic airway (SGA) devices in particular the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and its variants have become a reliable alternative to ETT for carrying out controlled ventilation. Of the several variants of LMA available today, the proseal LMA (PLMA) is preferred for controlled ventilation. The various advantages of LMA includes, a lower incidence of postoperative sore throat and superior haemodynamic profile during surgery. However, one aspect of providing anaesthesia with LMA compared to ETT is the ability of LMA to maintain equivalent depth of anaesthesia with lower anaesthetic requirement, is quiet intriguing and evidence to this regard is very limited.

By measuring the anaesthesia requirement using a robust computerised delivery system such as the closed loop anaesthesia delivery system (CLADS) we can establish for sure the anaesthesia required for maintaining intraoperative mechanical ventilation with the use of these two (ETT and PLMA) airway management devices.

This randomised controlled study aims to calculate the anaesthesia requirement as determined by the total amount of propofol consumed for maintaining anaesthesia with ETT versus PLMA

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Endotracheal tube (ETT) is the gold standard conduit for providing controlled ventilation during general anesthesia (GA). However, since the introduction of classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in the 1980's and serial evolution of supra-glottic airway devices (SGA) thereafter, LMAs have become a reliable alternative to ETT for carrying out controlled ventilation. Interestingly, of the additional advantages that the LMA proffers, including, a lower incidence of postoperative sore throat (POST) and superior hemodyamic profile during surgery; its ability to maintain equivalent depth of anesthesia (in comparison to when ETT-GA) with lower anesthetic requirement, is intriguing.

A handful of studies have demonstrated that the end-tidal isoflurane concentration required for maintenance of GA is 0.2 -0.53% greater with use of ETT as compared to LMA. However, the evidence generated by these studies remains unsubstantiated because in them, anaesthetic gas concentration was titrated to patient's clinical profile like heart rate and blood pressure without the backing of specific protocol for maintaining depth-of-anaesthesia. Therefore, for credible evidence, assessment of quantitative anesthetic requirement for achieving and sustaining a steady anesthesia depth with either LMA or ETT warrants confirmation with the use of an objective depth-of-anesthesia monitor, such as, bispectral index (BIS).

Closed loop anaesthesia delivery system (CLADS) is an indigenously developed patented (502/DEL/2003) computer-controlled and BIS-guided automated anesthesia delivery system. CLADS, which runs on a control algorithm based on the relationship between diverse rates of propofol infusion and the processed EEG variable; delivers propofol infusion at a rate which is continuously adjusted by patient's state of depth of anesthesia as per BIS monitoring input. This automated system maintains anaesthesia depth with high accuracy and objectively determines propofol delivery quantitatively.

Of the several variants of SGA available today, the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) 9 is preferred for controlled ventilation for its unique design that serves dual function of a ventilation tube and an oropharyngeal drainage tube for excluding gastric contents from getting aspirated through the peri-laryngeal cuff seal.

Given that CLADS can help us to accurately quantify anaesthesia, we hypothesize that there is no difference in anesthesia requirement for GA maintained through an ETT or a PLMA. This randomized controlled study aims to compare: anaesthesia requirement as determined by total propofol consumption (primary objective); intraoperative hemodynamic profile and incidence of POST (secondary objectives) in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with controlled ventilation via ETT or PLMA.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

160

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

    • National Capital Territory of Delhi
      • New Delhi、National Capital Territory of Delhi、インド、110060
        • Sir Ganga Ram Hospital

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

18年~65年 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ASA physical status I/II
  2. Undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Anticipated difficult airway
  2. Body mass index > 30-kg/m2
  3. Uncompensated cardiovascular disease (e.g. uncontrolled hypertension, atrio-ventricular block, sinus bradycardia, congenital heart disease, reduced LV compliance, diastolic dysfunction)
  4. Hepato-renal insufficiency
  5. Uncontrolled endocrinology disease (e.g. diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism)
  6. Known allergy/hypersensitivity to the study drug (propofol)
  7. Drug dependence/substance abuse/psychiatric illness
  8. Requirement of postoperative ventilation
  9. Refusal to informed consent

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:他の
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:ダブル

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
アクティブコンパレータ:ETT Group

Anesthesia will be induced with fentanyl-citrate (3µg/kg) and propofol (dose determined by automated system based on continuous BIS feedback from the patients). Atracurium besylate 0.5-mg/kg will be given to facilitate placement of airway device. Propofol administration rate will be controlled by a feedback loop facilitated by BIS monitoring using the closed-loop anaesthesia delivery system (CLADS). A BIS value of 50 will be used as the target point for induction and maintenance of GA.

Intraoperative ventilation will be instituted through a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) ETT (Portex, Smiths Medical ASD, Inc, Minneapolis, USA). The size of the tube will be standardized for the male (7.5 mm ID) and the female (6.5 MM ID).

After induction of anaesthesia patient will be intubated with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) ETT for maintaining intraoperative ventilation. Anaesthesia will be maintained with propofol and the administration rate will be controlled by a feedback loop facilitated by BIS monitoring using the closed-loop anaesthesia delivery system (CLADS). A BIS value of 50 will be used as the target point for induction and maintenance of GA.

アクティブコンパレータ:PLMA Group

Anesthesia will be induced with fentanyl-citrate (3µg/kg) and propofol (dose determined by automated system based on continuous BIS feedback from the patients). Atracurium besylate 0.5-mg/kg will be given to facilitate placement of airway device. Propofol administration rate will be controlled by a feedback loop facilitated by BIS monitoring using the closed-loop anaesthesia delivery system (CLADS). A BIS value of 50 will be used as the target point for induction and maintenance of GA. intraoperative ventilation will be maintained with PLMA (Telefex Medical, Westmeath Ireland) whose size would be selected based on body weight. In patients weighing 30-50 kg PLMA # 3.0, 50-70 kg PLMA # 4.0, and 50-100 kg PLMA # 5.0 will be inserted.

After induction of anaesthesia ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) will be inserted for maintaining intraoperative ventilation. Anaesthesia will be maintained with propofol and the administration rate will be controlled by a feedback loop facilitated by BIS monitoring using the closed-loop anaesthesia delivery system (CLADS). A BIS value of 50 will be used as the target point for induction and maintenance of GA.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change in Propofol usage in milligrams
時間枠:From beginning of anaesthesia (0-hours, baseline) till 4 hours intraoperatively

Comparison of quantitative difference in propofol requirement between the two groups

From beginning of anaesthesia (0-hours, baseline) till 4 hours intraoperatively

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Anaesthesia depth consistency using BIS scores
時間枠:From beginning of anaesthesia (0-hours, baseline) till 3 hours intraoperatively

Determined by the percentage of the total anaesthesia time in which the BIS scores remain within a score of 10% of the target BIS (i.e. BIS-50) in both the study arms.

From beginning of anaesthesia (0-hours, baseline) till 3 hours intraoperatively
Evaluation of propofol anaesthesia delivery system
時間枠:From beginning of anaesthesia (0-hours, baseline) till 3 hours intraoperatively

Determined by using Varvel criteria parameters; median performance error (MDP), median absolute performance error (MDAPE), wobble and global score in both the study arms

From beginning of anaesthesia (0-hours, baseline) till 3 hours intraoperatively
Change in Intra-operative heart Rate (beats per minute)
時間枠:From beginning of anaesthesia (0-hours, baseline) till 3 hours intraoperatively

Comparison of intra-operative heart rate between both the arms will be done

From beginning of anaesthesia (0-hours, baseline) till 3 hours intraoperatively
Change in Intra-operative systolic , diastolic, and mean (mmHg)
時間枠:From beginning of anaesthesia (0-hours, baseline) till 10 hours intraoperatively

Comparison of intra-operative blood pressure- systolic, diastolic, and mean between both the arms will be done

From beginning of anaesthesia (0-hours, baseline) till 10 hours intraoperatively
Early Recovery from anesthesia
時間枠:From end of anaesthesia till 20-minutes postoperatively

Time taken by the patient to open his/her eyes after discontinuation of anaesthesia will be noted

From end of anaesthesia till 20-minutes postoperatively
Post operative sedation
時間枠:From the end of anaesthesia till 24-hours, postoperatively

Will be assessed using Modified Observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale (MOAA/S)

From the end of anaesthesia till 24-hours, postoperatively
Incidence of postoperative sore throat
時間枠:From the end of anaesthesia till 24-hours, postoperatively

Comparison of post operative sore throat occurrence between the two groups

From the end of anaesthesia till 24-hours, postoperatively

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Nitin Sethi, DNB、Sir Ganga Ram Hospital
  • スタディディレクター:Amitabh Dutta, MD、Sir Ganga Ram Hospital
  • スタディチェア:Jayashree Sood, MD, FFRCA、Sir Ganga Ram Hospital

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2019年3月4日

一次修了 (実際)

2026年10月3日

研究の完了 (実際)

2026年10月3日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2019年1月19日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2019年1月19日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2019年1月23日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年11月12日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年11月11日

最終確認日

2026年4月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • EC/01/19/1464

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する