このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Requirements and Functional Schedule as a Part of Painrehabilitation.

2021年10月29日 更新者:Katarina Danielsson、Uppsala University

Requirements and Functional Schedule- An Intervention to Use in Painrehabilitation, to Strengthen the Collaboration Between the Healthcare, Employers and Employees

Requirements and functional Schedule also calen Demand Ability Protocol (DAP) is an intervention that has been tested and found useful in occupational health service. The intervention aims to strengthen the collaboration between Health care, employers and employee. The intervention is based on a structured interview about the employers demands at work. This intervention (DAP) will in the present study be evaluated in pain rehabilitation both qualitatively and quantitatively.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Description of the intervention: Demand and Ability Protocol Demand and Ability Protocol (DAP) is an intervention linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, and is based on the Dutch Functional Ability List and knowledge about disability in working life (Brouwer et al, 2002). The intervention has been further developed and modified in Norway and is primarily used in occupational health care services for collaboration between an employee and his or her immediate manager (Engbers & Furuland, 2006).

The intervention consists of a structured conversation between the patient and his immediate manager under the guidance of licensed medical staff (in this case REKO) with knowledge of the requirements of the patient's work and his/her current functional ability. The intervention takes about 90 minutes excluding preparation time for REKO.

DAP consider the following domains; 1) mental and cognitive ability, 2) basic skills and social ability, 3) tolerance for physical conditions, 4) ability to work dynamically, 5) ability to work statically and 6) to be able to work certain times.

Based on the above domains, a structured review is made of the balance between requirements and function in current work in order to identify possible adaptations and measures at the workplace. During the intervention, the work requirements and the patient's function/ability are identified on a three-point scale and in domains where the rating of requirements and function/ability does not match, there is thus an imbalance, and here adjustments or changed tasks may be relevant to consider increasing work ability and reducing sick leave. The intervention concludes with a summary of the situation and joint development of appropriate measures/adaptations to promote the patient's RTW. This is documented on a form, which is signed by both the patient and the manage

研究の種類

介入

入学 (予想される)

150

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

研究連絡先のバックアップ

研究場所

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

18年~65年 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

Chronic pain, has an employment

Exclusion Criteria:

no longer than 6 month of total sick-leave

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:非ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:単一グループの割り当て
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Painrehabilitation + Demand and ability protocol
Will receive pain-rehabilitation and the intervention ( an interview called Requirements and functional Schedule, with the patients employer and an occupational therapist)
An interview with the employee and the employer where the occupational worker is leading the interview and a pain rehabilitation-program
アクティブコンパレータ:Painrehabilitation
Will receive pain-rehabilitation
a pain rehabilitation-program

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Absence from work (sickleave) measured with a question to the participants
時間枠:Changes from baseline in absence from work to the end of the rehab program (average 4month)
Less absence from work
Changes from baseline in absence from work to the end of the rehab program (average 4month)
Absence from work (sickleave) measured with a question to the participants
時間枠:Changes from baseline in absence from work through study completion (average 1,5 years)
Less absence from work
Changes from baseline in absence from work through study completion (average 1,5 years)

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Changes in EuroQol 5-dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D)
時間枠:Change from baseline in EuroQol 5-dimensions through study completion (average 1,5 years)

Changes in quality of Life measured with the EuroQol 5-dimensions. Each combination of values has an idex value where 1 is the best quality of life. The questionnaire also includes a visual analog scale (VAS), which records the respondent's self-rated health status on a graduated (0-100) scale, with higher scores for higher qulaity of life

.

Change from baseline in EuroQol 5-dimensions through study completion (average 1,5 years)
Changes in EuroQol 5-dimensions
時間枠:Change from baseline in EuroQol 5-dimensions to the end of the rehab program (average foru month)
Changes in quality of Life measured with the EuroQol 5-dimensions. Each combination of values has an idex value where 1 is the best quality of life. The questionnaire also includes a visual analog scale (VAS), which records the respondent's self-rated health status on a graduated (0-100) scale, with higher scores for higher qulaity of life
Change from baseline in EuroQol 5-dimensions to the end of the rehab program (average foru month)
Changes in Anxiety and depression
時間枠:Change from baseline in anxiety and depression through study completion (average 1,5 years)hs)
Changes in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The scale icludes two subscales one focusing on anxiety symptoms and one on depressive symptoms. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 21 for each subscale. Higher scores means worse outcome.
Change from baseline in anxiety and depression through study completion (average 1,5 years)hs)
Changes in Anxiety and depression
時間枠:Change from baseline in anxiety and depression to the end of the rehab program (average four month)
Changes in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The scale icludes two subscales one focusing on anxiety symptoms and one on depressive symptoms. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 21 for each subscale. Higher scores means worse outcome.
Change from baseline in anxiety and depression to the end of the rehab program (average four month)
Changes in sleep
時間枠:Change from baseline in Insomnia Severity Index to the end of the rehab program (average four month)
Changes in Insomnia measured with Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 28. Higher scores indicates a worse outcome.
Change from baseline in Insomnia Severity Index to the end of the rehab program (average four month)
Changes in sleep
時間枠:Change from baseline in Insomnia Severity Index through study completion (average 1,5 years)
Changes in sleep measured with Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 28. Higher scores indicates a worse outcome.
Change from baseline in Insomnia Severity Index through study completion (average 1,5 years)
Changes in Life satisfaction
時間枠:Change from baseline in Life Satisfaction Questionnaire to the end of the rehab program (average four month)
Changes in Life Satisfaction measured with Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (Li-Sat-11). Minimum score at 11 and maximum score at 66. Higher scores indicate a greater level of perceived satisfaction.
Change from baseline in Life Satisfaction Questionnaire to the end of the rehab program (average four month)
Changes in Life satisfaction
時間枠:Change from baseline in Life Satisfaction Questionnaire through study completion (average 1,5 years)
Changes in Life Satisfaction measured with Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (Li-Sat-11). Minimum score at 11 and maximum score at 66. Higher scores indicate a greater level of perceived satisfaction.
Change from baseline in Life Satisfaction Questionnaire through study completion (average 1,5 years)
Changes in Work ability
時間枠:Change from baseline in Work ability to the end of the rehab program (average four month)
Changes in work ability measured with the 7:th question in Work Ability Index questionnaire
Change from baseline in Work ability to the end of the rehab program (average four month)
Changes in Work ability
時間枠:Change from baseline in Work ability through study completion (average 1,5 years)
Changes in work ability measured with the 7:th question in Work Ability Index questionnaire
Change from baseline in Work ability through study completion (average 1,5 years)
Changes in health-related quality of life
時間枠:Change from baseline in RAND-36 to the end of the rehab program (average four month)
Changes in health-related quality of life measured with RAND-36. The RAND-36 consists of 36 items grouped into eight multi-item scales: physical functioning (PF), role-functioning/physical (RP), pain (P), general health (GH), energy/fatigue (EF), social functioning (SF), role-functioning/emotional (RE), and emotional well-being (EW). An additional item asks about health change (HC) in the past year. Scale scores are summed and transformed into scales ranging from 0 (worst possible health state) to 100 (best possible state).
Change from baseline in RAND-36 to the end of the rehab program (average four month)
Changes in health-related quality of life
時間枠:Change from baseline in RAND-36 through study completion (average 1,5 years)
Changes in health-related quality of life measured with RAND-36. The RAND-36 consists of 36 items grouped into eight multi-item scales: physical functioning (PF), role-functioning/physical (RP), pain (P), general health (GH), energy/fatigue (EF), social functioning (SF), role-functioning/emotional (RE), and emotional well-being (EW). An additional item asks about health change (HC) in the past year. Scale scores are summed and transformed into scales ranging from 0 (worst possible health state) to 100 (best possible state).
Change from baseline in RAND-36 through study completion (average 1,5 years)

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Therese Hellman, PhD、Uppsala University

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2019年6月20日

一次修了 (予想される)

2022年12月20日

研究の完了 (予想される)

2023年12月20日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2019年7月16日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2021年10月1日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2021年10月15日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2021年11月8日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2021年10月29日

最終確認日

2021年10月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

追加の関連 MeSH 用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • 2019/01755

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

慢性の痛みの臨床試験

Requirements and functional Scheduleの臨床試験

3
購読する