デジタルマイクロムーブメント・ナッジ介入が大学生のウェルビーイングと学業成績に及ぼす影響
大学生におけるデジタルマイクロムーブメントナッジ介入のウェルビーイングと学業成果への影響:ランダム化比較試験
このランダム化比較試験の目的は、21日間の身体的レジリエンス(運動ベース)プログラムが、大学生の精神的ウェルビーイング、感情調整、および学業機能を改善できるかどうかを学ぶことです。
この研究が答えようとする主な質問は以下の通りです:
21日間の身体的レジリエンスプログラムへの参加は、学生のウェルビーイング(例:抑うつ、不安、ストレス、感情、生活満足度、および主観的健康感)を改善するか?
このプログラムは、学生の学業および自己調整アウトカム(例:エンゲージメント、バーンアウト、先延ばし、生産性、感情調整、コーピング、および自己制御能力)を改善するか?
研究者は、身体的レジリエンスプログラムを直ちに完了する学生と、ウェイトリスト対照群の学生を比較し、プログラムへの参加がウェルビーイングおよび学業関連アウトカムのより大きな改善につながるかどうかを確認します。
参加者は以下のことを行います:
オンラインで登録し、インフォームドコンセントを提供する
介入群またはウェイトリスト対照群のいずれかに無作為に割り当てられる
21日間、Telegramを介して毎日のマイクロムーブメントタスクとリマインダーを受信する(介入群)
ベースライン時、介入後、および2週間後のフォローアップ時にオンライン質問紙調査を完了する
調査の概要
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
-
Singapore、シンガポール
- Singapore Management University, Online
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
説明
参加基準:
- シンガポール経営大学の学生であること
- Telegramを使用していること
除外基準:
- 18歳未満
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:支持療法
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:独身
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:介入群
|
この介入は、大学生の精神的健康と学業機能をサポートするために設計された、毎日の短時間の運動ベースの活動からなる、21日間のデジタル配信による身体的レジリエンスプログラムです。 このプログラムには、特別な機器や事前の身体トレーニングを必要とせずに独立して完了できる、低強度の身体運動、呼吸法、および身体ベースの調整練習が含まれています。 介入群に割り当てられた参加者は、21日間連続で1日1つの構造化された運動課題を受け取ります。 課題はTelegramチャンネルを介して配信され、参加を促すための短いデジタルリマインダーが付随します。 各課題は、時間が短く、タイミングが柔軟で、日常生活の中で実行可能なように設計されており、身体的な負荷やパフォーマンスよりも一貫性を重視しています。 この介入は自己主導型で非同期であり、対面での接触、ライブセッション、または直接の監督はありません。
他の名前:
|
|
介入なし:キャンセル待ち管理
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
State anxiety
時間枠:Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
State anxiety will be assessed using the 6-item Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI-6 Six items (e.g., "I was worried these past 2 weeks.")
rated from 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much so) will be averaged for a composite score.
Higher scores indicate greater levels of anxiety.
|
Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
|
Procrastination
時間枠:Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
Procrastination will be assessed using six items from the Irrational Procrastination Scale, such as "At the end of these past 2 weeks, I know I could have spent the time this week better."
Participants will respond on a 1-5 scale (1 = Very seldom or not true of me, 5 = Very often true, or true with me), and higher average scores indicate higher levels of procrastination.
|
Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
実施意図
時間枠:介入終了時(3週間後)からフォローアップ終了時(5週間後)までの参加者登録
|
実施意図は、「過去14日間、私は今月の目標を達成するためのステップを踏んできた」という単一項目を使用して測定されます。
1(強く反対)から5(強く同意)で採点され、スコアが高いほど実施意図が高いことを示します。
|
介入終了時(3週間後)からフォローアップ終了時(5週間後)までの参加者登録
|
|
目標の進捗
時間枠:3週間時点での介入終了時および5週間時点での追跡終了時までの登録
|
目標の進捗は、「過去14日間で、今月の目標に向けた進捗が見られました。」という単一項目を用いて測定します。
スコアは1(全く同意しない)から5(強く同意する)で評価され、スコアが高いほど目標の進捗が高いことを示します。
|
3週間時点での介入終了時および5週間時点での追跡終了時までの登録
|
|
認識された健康状態
時間枠:介入終了時(3週間後)からフォローアップ終了時(5週間後)までの参加者登録
|
知覚された健康状態は、一般的な健康状態に関する単一項目の自己報告尺度を用いて評価されます。
参加者は、「過去2週間のあなたの身体的健康状態をどのように評価しますか?」という質問に回答します。
回答は、1(悪い)から5(優れている)までの5段階尺度で評価されます。
高いスコアは、より良い知覚された身体的健康状態を示します。
|
介入終了時(3週間後)からフォローアップ終了時(5週間後)までの参加者登録
|
|
Productivity
時間枠:Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
Productivity will be assessed using the Task Performance subscale of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ), adapted to the academic context.
Participants will respond to five items (e.g., "I was able to plan my work so that I finished it on time") with reference to their schoolwork.
Items will be rated on a 6-point scale from 0 (seldom) to 5 (always) and then the scores will be averaged, with higher scores indicating greater productivity.
|
Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
|
Study Burnout
時間枠:Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
Study burnout will be measured using the 9-item Study Burnout Inventory.
Participants will indicate how well each item described their experiences (e.g., "I felt a lack of motivation in studying and often think of giving up") on a 6-point scale from 1 (Completely disagree) to 6 (Completely agree).
Scores will be averaged, with higher scores indicating greater academic burnout.
|
Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
|
Study Engagement
時間枠:Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
Study engagement will be measured using the 9-item Study Engagement Inventory.
Participants will rate items such as "I found studying full of meaning and purpose" based on their experiences.
Responses will be given on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Completely disagree) to 6 (Completely agree) and higher scores will indicate greater levels of academic engagement.
|
Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
|
Depression
時間枠:Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
Depression will be measured using an adapted version of the 10-item Short Depression Scale Revised (CES-D-R 10).
The scale includes the sample item "I felt that everything I did was an effort."
and is scored from 1 (Rarely or none of the time) to 4 (All of the time).
Scores will be averaged and higher scores indicate higher risk of depression.
|
Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
|
Life Satisfaction
時間枠:Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
Life satisfaction will be measured using an adapted version of Diener's Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS).
The scale includes 5 items e.g.
"In most ways, these past 2 weeks have been close to ideal" and is scored from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 7 (Strongly agree).
Scores will be summed and higher scores indicate higher life satisfaction.
|
Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
|
Perceived Stress
時間枠:Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
Perceived stress will be measured by an adapted version of the 4-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) developed by Cohen and colleagues.
One sample item includes "In the last 2 weeks, how often have you felt difficulties piling up so high that you could not overcome them?" and items are scored from 0 (Never) to 4 (Very often).
The composite score is calculated by summing the scores of all items; higher scores indicate higher levels of perceived stress.
|
Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
|
Positive and Negative Affect
時間枠:Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
Positive Affect (PA) and Negative Affect (NA) will be evaluated using the Circumplex Model of Affect.
Participants will rate feelings such as 'Energetic' and 'Dejected' experienced over the past two weeks, from a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = Not at all, 5 = Extremely).
|
Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
|
Coping
時間枠:Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
Coping strategies will be assessed using the Brief COPE which is a 28-item self-report measure assessing a range of adaptive and maladaptive coping responses to stress.
Participants will indicate how frequently they have engaged in various coping behaviours in response to stress over the past two weeks (e.g., "I've been taking action to try to make the situation better").
Items will be rated on a 4-point scale from 1 (I haven't been doing this at all) to 4 (I've been doing this a lot).
Scores will then be averaged for each coping strategy, with higher scores indicating greater use of that coping strategy.
|
Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
|
Emotion Regulation
時間枠:Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
Emotion regulation will be assessed using the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ), which is a 10-item self-report measure assessing two emotion regulation strategies: cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression.
Participants will indicate the extent to which they agree with statements describing how they typically regulate their emotions (e.g., "I control my emotions by changing the way I think about the situation I'm in").
Items are rated on a 7-point scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).
Subscale scores will be computed by averaging items corresponding to cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression, with higher scores indicating greater use of the respective emotion regulation strategy.
|
Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
|
Self-Control Capacity
時間枠:Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
Self-control capacity will be assessed using the Brief State Self-Control Capacity Scale (BSSCS), which is a 5-item self-report measure assessing individuals' perceived momentary self-control resources.
Participants will indicate the extent to which each statement reflects their experiences over the past two weeks (e.g., "I felt like my willpower was gone").
Items are rated on a 7-point scale from 1 (not true) to 7 (very true).
Items will be averaged to compute a composite score, with higher scores indicating greater state self-control capacity.
|
Enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 weeks and the end of follow-up at 5 weeks
|
協力者と研究者
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.
- Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
- Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DL. Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). Am J Prev Med. 1994 Mar-Apr;10(2):77-84.
- Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92-100. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6.
- Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):348-62. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348.
- Marteau TM, Bekker H. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol. 1992 Sep;31(3):301-6. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1992.tb00997.x.
- Steel, P. D. G. (2002). The measurement and nature of procrastination. University of Minnesota.
- Salmela-Aro, K., & Read, S. (2017). Study engagement and burnout profiles among Finnish higher education students. Burnout Research, 7, 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burn.2017.11.001
- Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C., Hildebrandt, V., van Buuren, S., van der Beek, A. J., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2013). Development of an individual work performance questionnaire. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(1), 6-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401311285273
- Lindner, C., Lindner, M. A., & Retelsdorf, J. (2019). Measuring self-control depletion in achievement situations: A validation of the 5-item brief state self-control capacity scale. Diagnostica, 65(4), 228-242. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000230
- Conner, T. S., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Creative Days: A Daily Diary Study of Emotion, Personality, and Everyday Creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 463-470. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000022
- Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161-1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714
- Koopmans L, Bernaards CM, Hildebrandt VH, de Vet HC, van der Beek AJ. Construct validity of the individual work performance questionnaire. J Occup Environ Med. 2014 Mar;56(3):331-7. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000113.
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。