이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Voices From the Black Community: Hepatitis C Research Participation

2020년 6월 29일 업데이트: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Voices From the Black Community: Beliefs and Attitudes on Participating in Research Studies for Chronic Hepatitis C

This is a one-time cross-sectional survey study of approximately 200 self-identified black or African-American patients who have had chronic hepatitis C viral infection (HCV) that will evaluate patients' willingness to participate (WTP) in health/medical research related to HCV and attitudinal factors that might be associated with WTP, such as benefits and barriers to research participation, mistrust of physicians/researchers, health literacy, and knowledge of health/research studies.

연구 개요

상태

완전한

정황

상세 설명

Chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection is three times more prevalent in the African American/black (AA) population than in white patients in the U.S.; yet minorities are woefully under-represented in HCV research, particularly in Phase III drug registration trials. A recent systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) of HCV treatments with interferon-based treatments from 2000 to 2011 found that the proportion of African-American patients in RCTs ranged from 0% - 11%. Despite significant increases in efficacy and reductions in adverse events associated with the new direct acting antiviral (DAA) regimens, the proportion of black patients enrolled in Phase II-III DAA registration trials has not increased dramatically and generally ranges from 1%-18%. Because participation rates in medical research do not fully represent the overall U.S. population or prevalence rates among various subgroups, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has mandated pharmaceutical companies to improve demographic subgroups included in clinical trials, to identify barriers to subgroup enrollment in clinical trials, and to employ strategies to encourage greater participation.

Enrolling more diverse patients in medical research, especially racial minorities, is a ubiquitous dilemma that has received a fair amount of scientific attention in the last 10 years. This research has found an important role for the perceptions and attitudes that people have about participating in clinical research. Negative perceptions serve as barriers to enrollment in clinical research, while positive attitudes are facilitators of research participation. Additionally, knowledge gaps, patient-provider communication, health literacy, and mistrust of research and scientists are a few of the commonly reported barriers to participation among minority patients. To our knowledge, no study has been undertaken with black patients with HCV to understand their specific attitudes and perspectives related to participation in HCV-related health or medical research. This information is a prerequisite to developing effective approaches to increasing participation of the black community in HCV-related health or medical research.

Two hundred Black patients will be recruited. Patients who participated in The Patient-Reported Outcomes Project of HCV-TARGET ("PROP UP TARGET") study will be invited to participate. Patients will also be recruited from liver clinics at one medical center. Patients will respond to several survey questions over the phone or in person related to WTP and attitudinal factors related to clinical research.

Participant responses and characteristics will be summarized using graphical and tabular descriptive statistical methods such as sample means, percentiles, frequencies, proportions and standard deviations. All statistical estimates will be reported with confidence intervals.

연구 유형

관찰

등록 (실제)

200

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 미국, 27599
        • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

21년 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

샘플링 방법

비확률 샘플

연구 인구

Patients who self-identify as black or African-American and have been infected with chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection. Patients will be recruited from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Project (PROP UP) observational study (11 U.S. liver centers) and from a tertiary care liver HCV clinic.

설명

Inclusion Criteria

  • Previous enrollment in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Project (PROP UP) or recruited from HCV Liver Clinics at the University of North Carolina.
  • Self-identified as African-American or Black during the PROP UP study or in-person
  • Provide written or verbal permission to be contacted about future research studies

Exclusion Criteria

  • Express unwillingness to be contacted about future studies
  • Withdrew from PROP UP post-enrollment (eg. death, patient withdrawal)
  • Unwilling or unable to provide verbal consent
  • Identifies during the phone survey or in-person that he/she is not African-American or Black

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Overall Willingness to Participate (WTP) Mean Score
기간: through study completion, an average of 1 day
Overall Willingness to Participate Scale (WTP): WTP in research studies was evaluated using 13 items to assess WTP in different types of health/medical research studies. Responses were based on a five-point Likert scale from 1 (not at all willing) to 5 (very willing), with 3 connoting "unsure/neutral." The overall WTP score will be calculated for each participant by taking the mean of the 13 items. Higher scores indicate higher WTP.
through study completion, an average of 1 day

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Perceived Benefits/Advantages of Participating in Health/Medical Research Mean Score
기간: through study completion, an average of 1 day
Perceived Benefits Scale: Patients respond to 16 items regarding perceived benefits or advantages of research participation. Each item is rated on a 5 point likert scale: 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=unsure, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree. The average of all items will be used to create the total mean benefit score. Higher scores indicate higher Perceived Benefits.
through study completion, an average of 1 day
Perceived Barriers/Disadvantages of Participating in Health/Medical Research Mean Score
기간: through study completion, an average of 1 day
Perceived Barriers Scale: Patients respond to 12 items regarding barriers or disadvantages of research participation. Each item is rated on a 5 point likert scale: 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=unsure, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree. The average of all items will be used to create the total mean barrier score. Higher scores indicate higher Perceived Barriers.
through study completion, an average of 1 day
Perceived Trust in Doctors Mean Score
기간: through study completion, an average of 1 day
Trust in Doctors Scale: Patients respond to 12 items regarding their trust or mistrust in their medical providers. Each item is rated on a 5 point likert scale: 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=unsure, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree. Negative items were reverse scored. The average of all items will be used to create the total mean trust score. Higher scores indicate higher Perceived Trust.
through study completion, an average of 1 day
Perceived Health Literacy Mean Score
기간: through study completion, an average of 1 day
Perceived Health Literacy Scale: Three items assessed the health literacy of participants with a five-point response scale: 1 (Never), 2 (Rarely), 3 (Sometimes), 4 (Often), 5 (Always). Participants were asked (a) how frequently they asked others to help them read medical materials, (b) if they felt uncomfortable filling out medical forms, and (c) if they did not understand their medical condition due to difficulty reading medical materials. The average of all items will be used to create the total mean health literacy score. Lower scores indicate higher Perceived Health Literacy.
through study completion, an average of 1 day
Subjective Knowledge of Health/Medical Research Mean Score
기간: through study completion, an average of 1 day
Subjective Knowledge Scale: Participants were asked how well they felt they understood what health/medical research involved. This was assessed on a five-point response scale: 1 (Not at all), 2 (Not too well), 3 (Somewhat well), 4 (Pretty well), 5 (Very well). The average of all items will be used to create the total mean subjective knowledge score. Higher scores indicate higher subjective knowledge.
through study completion, an average of 1 day
Objective Knowledge of Health/Medical Research Mean Score
기간: through study completion, an average of 1 day
Objective Knowledge Scale: Knowledge of clinical trials was measured with 10 true/false questions about aspects of clinical trials. The proportion of correct responses per patient will be recorded. Higher proportion indicates higher objective knowledge.
through study completion, an average of 1 day

기타 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Proportion of Participant Recommendations for Strategies
기간: through study completion, an average of 1 day
Open-ended qualitative question to solicit participants' recommendations for strategies to enhance racial diversity in HCV-related research studies. Responses will be categorized into different recommendation strategies and proportion of patients who listed a strategy in that category will be reported.
through study completion, an average of 1 day

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

협력자

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Donna M Evon, PhD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2019년 2월 21일

기본 완료 (실제)

2020년 5월 15일

연구 완료 (실제)

2020년 6월 19일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2019년 12월 11일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2019년 12월 16일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2019년 12월 17일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2020년 7월 1일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2020년 6월 29일

마지막으로 확인됨

2020년 6월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • 18-0662

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

IPD 계획 설명

There is no plan at this time to make individual participant data available to other researchers.

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .