이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Chemical vs Mechanical Pleural Adhesiolysis for Liberation of Captive Pleura in Stacked Effusion

2026년 7월 14일 업데이트: Amir Soliman, Delta University for Science and Technology

Liberation of Captive Pleura: Chemical Pleural Adhesiolysis Versus Mechanical Pleural Adhesiolysis in Stacked Pleural Effusion

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological efficacy of chemical pleural adhesiolysis (using either intrapleural 3% hydrogen peroxide or intrapleural corticosteroids) versus mechanical pleural adhesiolysis (via medical thoracoscopy) in patients with non-malignant, complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion (CPPE).

Complicated pleural effusions often lead to the formation of fibrinous septa and adhesions, which impair drainage and prevent lung re-expansion. Standard interventions like tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and DNase can be costly and limited in resource-constrained settings, while thoracoscopic mechanical pleurolysis requires specialized expertise and equipment.

The investigators aim to evaluate whether chemical adhesiolysis using accessible, cost-effective agents (hydrogen peroxide or steroids) can offer a comparable and reliable alternative to thoracoscopic mechanical disruption of septa. Efficacy will be assessed using a novel composite clinical and radiological efficiency score evaluated seven days post-procedure.

연구 개요

상태

완전한

정황

개입 / 치료

상세 설명

This is a parallel-group, open-label, single-blinded (radiological and ultrasonographic assessors), pilot randomized controlled clinical trial conducted at the Chest Medicine Department, Mansoura University Hospital.

A total of 36 eligible adult patients (aged 18-62 years) presenting with unilateral complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion requiring pleurolytic intervention will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio into one of three treatment arms (12 patients per arm):

  • Group A (Hydrogen Peroxide-Mediated Pleurolysis): Patients will receive intrapleural instillation of 250-300 mL of 3% hydrogen peroxide (diluted with sterile saline) via an existing intercostal drain after the initial drainage phase. The tube will be clamped for 4-6 hours while the patient alternates positions (supine and lateral decubitus) to optimize distribution. This protocol will be repeated 24 hours later for a total of two sessions.
  • Group B (Steroid-Mediated Pleurolysis): Patients will receive intrapleural instillation of either Dexamethasone 8 mg or Triamcinolone acetonide 0.3-0.6 mg/kg (approximately 80 mg), diluted in normal saline to a total volume of 250-300 mL via the intercostal drain.

Clamping, positional rotation, and dosing intervals (two sessions 24 hours apart) will be identical to Group A.

● Group C (Thoracoscopic Mechanical Pleurolysis): Patients will undergo medical thoracoscopy under local anesthesia and conscious sedation. This involves direct visual exploration of the pleural cavity, mechanical disruption of fibrinous septa/adhesions, evacuation of loculated fluid, and subsequent placement of an intercostal drain.

Assessments will be conducted at baseline (pre-intervention) and at 7 days post-procedure to evaluate treatment response:

  1. CT Volumetry (128-slice multidetector CT) will quantify affected lung volume and percentage of improvement.
  2. Chest Ultrasonography (B-mode and M-mode) will measure fractional pleural thickness reduction and diaphragmatic excursion.

The primary outcome will be evaluated using a 0-6 point composite clinical/radiological efficiency score at day 7, combining lung volumetric improvement, diaphragmatic excursion, pleural thickness reduction, drained fluid volume, and resolution of effusion complexity. Patients who fail chemical pleurolysis (Group A or B) will be offered crossover to mechanical pleurolysis as a rescue intervention.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

36

단계

  • 2 단계

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

      • Gamasa, 이집트, 1234
        • Delta University for Science and Technology

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 성인

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

예

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

-

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient age between 18 and 62 years inclusive.
  2. Presence of a unilateral complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion (CPPE) requiring pleurolytic intervention.
  3. Imaging-confirmed pleural loculation on chest ultrasonography or computed tomography (CT).
  4. Pleural fluid biochemical or microbiological indicators of complicated effusion, defined by at least one of the following: pleural fluid pH < 7.2, glucose < 60 mg/dL, and/or a positive Gram stain or culture.
  5. Absolute histopathological or cytological exclusion of malignant and tuberculous pleural disease prior to enrollment (verified via closed pleural biopsy and/or image-guided pleural biopsy based on clinical presentation).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Confirmed malignant pleural effusion or features highly suggestive of malignancy (e.g., pleural nodularity, circumferential pleural thickening > 10 mm, mediastinal pleural involvement, or associated pulmonary masses) not yet fully evaluated.
  2. Tuberculous pleural effusion.
  3. Transudative pleural effusion.
  4. Frozen chest syndrome or chronic trapped lung.
  5. Pregnancy.
  6. Known bleeding diathesis or uncorrected coagulopathy.
  7. Patient refusal or inability to provide written informed consent.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 하나의

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Group A: Hydrogen Peroxide-Mediated Pleurolysis
Participants with unilateral complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion randomized to receive intrapleural 3% hydrogen peroxide instilled via an existing intercostal drain.
Diluted pharmaceutical-grade 3% hydrogen peroxide solution. A total volume of 250-300 mL is instilled via an intercostal chest tube (accounting for tube dead space to deliver approximately 250 mL directly into the pleural cavity). Administered in 2 sessions, spaced 24 hours apart, with a 4-6 hour chest tube clamping window per session.
실험적: Group B: Steroid-Mediated Pleurolysis
Participants with unilateral complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion randomized to receive intrapleural corticosteroids (dexamethasone or triamcinolone acetonide) instilled via an existing intercostal drain.
Administered via an existing intercostal drain. Corticosteroid agent used is either Dexamethasone 8 mg or Triamcinolone acetonide 0.3-0.6 mg/kg (approximately 80 mg), diluted in normal saline to a total volume of 250-300 mL. Administered in 2 sessions, spaced 24 hours apart, with a 4-6 hour chest tube clamping window per session.
실험적: Group C: Thoracoscopic Mechanical Pleurolysis
Participants with unilateral complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion randomized to undergo medical thoracoscopy for direct vision-guided mechanical disruption of fibrinous septa and adhesions.
Performed under local anesthesia and conscious sedation. Involves medical thoracoscopy for direct vision-guided mechanical disruption of fibrinous septa and adhesions, evacuation of loculations, and placement of an intercostal drain.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Composite Radiological Efficiency Score
기간: 7 days post-intervention
Treatment efficiency is evaluated using a study-defined composite clinical/radiological score ranging from 0 to 6. The score integrates 5 domains: (1) Lung volumetric improvement, (2) Diaphragmatic excursion improvement, (3) Pleural thickness reduction, and (4) Drained pleural fluid volume. For these first four domains, a percentage change/improvement from baseline equals or more than 30% is assigned 1 point, while a change < 30% is assigned 0 points. The 5th domain is Effusion complexity, scored sonographically as: septated = 0, complex = 1, and simple = 2. Higher total scores indicate a greater pleurolytic response, with treatment success classified as a total score equals or more than 5.
7 days post-intervention

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2026년 3월 26일

기본 완료 (실제)

2026년 6월 27일

연구 완료 (실제)

2026년 6월 27일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 6월 28일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 7월 14일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 7월 20일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 7월 20일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 7월 14일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 7월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • R.26.03.3607

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

예

IPD 계획 설명

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in the final published manuscript (including text, tables, and figures) will be made available to qualified medical researchers to facilitate secondary academic reviews or meta-analyses.

IPD 공유 기간

Data will become available beginning 6 months after publication of the main trial results and will remain accessible for up to 36 months.

IPD 공유 액세스 기준

IPD will be shared upon reasonable formal request directed to the principal investigator. Requests must include a methodologically sound research proposal and a signed data access agreement to ensure ethical compliance.

IPD 공유 지원 정보 유형

  • 연구_프로토콜
  • 수액

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .