이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reslizumab Treatment in Patients With Moderate to Severe Asthma

2016년 5월 26일 업데이트: Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.

A 16-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reslizumab (3.0 mg/kg) Treatment in Patients With Moderate to Severe Asthma

The primary objective of the study is to characterize the efficacy of reslizumab treatment, at a dosage of 3.0 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) every 4 weeks for a total of 4 doses, in improving pulmonary function in relation to baseline blood eosinophil levels in patients with moderate to severe asthma, as assessed by the change from baseline to week 16 in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1).

연구 개요

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

511

단계

  • 3단계

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, 미국
        • Investigational Site 861
      • Homewood, Alabama, 미국
        • Investigational Site 842
      • Jasper, Alabama, 미국
        • Investigational Site 887
    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, 미국
        • Investigational Site 809
      • Tucson, Arizona, 미국
        • Investigational Site 892
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, 미국
        • Investigational Site 846
    • California
      • Anaheim, California, 미국
        • Investigational Site 828
      • Fresno, California, 미국
        • Investigational Site 900
      • Huntington Beach, California, 미국
        • Investigational Site 862
      • Los Angeles, California, 미국
        • Investigational Site 852
      • Los Angeles, California, 미국
        • Investigational Site 909
      • Newport Beach, California, 미국
        • Investigational Site 864
      • Rancho Mirage, California, 미국
        • Investigational Site 812
      • Riverside, California, 미국
        • Investigational Site 808
      • Sacramento, California, 미국
        • Investigational Site 804
    • Colorado
      • Centennial, Colorado, 미국
        • Investigational Site 837
      • Denver, Colorado, 미국
        • Investigational Site 851
      • Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 미국
        • Investigational Site 832
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, 미국
        • Investigational Site 855
      • Miami, Florida, 미국
        • Investigational Site 865
      • Miami, Florida, 미국
        • Investigational Site 881
    • Georgia
      • Albany, Georgia, 미국
        • Investigational Site 805
      • Stockbridge, Georgia, 미국
        • Investigational Site 870
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, 미국
        • Investigational Site 816
      • Shiloh, Illinois, 미국
        • Investigational Site 824
    • Indiana
      • Evansville, Indiana, 미국
        • Investigational Site 883
      • Fort Wayne, Indiana, 미국
        • Investigational Site 878
    • Kansas
      • Lenexa, Kansas, 미국
        • Investigational Site 820
    • Kentucky
      • Owensboro, Kentucky, 미국
        • Investigational Site 873
    • Louisiana
      • Lafayette, Louisiana, 미국
        • Investigational Site 801
      • Mandeville, Louisiana, 미국
        • Investigational Site 877
    • Maryland
      • White Marsh, Maryland, 미국
        • Investigational Site 875
    • Massachusetts
      • Fall River, Massachusetts, 미국
        • Investigational Site 871
      • North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, 미국
        • Investigational Site 834
    • Michigan
      • Troy, Michigan, 미국
        • Investigational Site 889
    • Missouri
      • Rolla, Missouri, 미국
        • Investigational Site 838
      • St. Louis, Missouri, 미국
        • Investigational Site 818
      • St. Louis, Missouri, 미국
        • Investigational Site 841
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, 미국
        • Investigational Site 857
    • New York
      • Newburgh, New York, 미국
        • Investigational Site 819
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, 미국
        • Investigational Site 844
    • Ohio
      • Middleburg Heights, Ohio, 미국
        • Investigational Site 845
    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, 미국
        • Investigational Site 810
    • Oregon
      • Ashland, Oregon, 미국
        • Investigational Site 859
      • Portland, Oregon, 미국
        • Investigational Site 859
    • Pennsylvania
      • Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, 미국
        • Investigational Site 854
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, 미국
        • Investigational Site 843
    • South Carolina
      • Florence, South Carolina, 미국
        • Investigational Site 802
      • Orangeburg, South Carolina, 미국
        • Investigational Site 814
      • Spartanburg, South Carolina, 미국
        • Investigational Site 821
      • Spartanburg, South Carolina, 미국
        • Investigational Site 829
    • Tennessee
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, 미국
        • Investigational Site 850
      • Nashville, Tennessee, 미국
        • Investigational Site 803
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, 미국
        • Investigational Site 880
      • Dickinson, Texas, 미국
        • Investigational Site 858
      • Live Oak, Texas, 미국
        • Investigational Site 869
      • Plano, Texas, 미국
        • Investigational Site 879
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, 미국
        • Investigational Site 847
      • West Jordan, Utah, 미국
        • Investigational Site 876
    • Virginia
      • Fairfax, Virginia, 미국
        • Investigational Site 840
      • Richmond, Virginia, 미국
        • Investigational Site 836
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, 미국
        • Investigational Site 867
      • Spokane, Washington, 미국
        • Investigational Site 833
      • Vancouver, Washington, 미국
        • Investigational Site 904
    • Wisconsin
      • Greenfield, Wisconsin, 미국
        • Investigational Site 806
      • LaCrosse, Wisconsin, 미국
        • Investigational Site 823

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion criteria:

Patients are included in the study if all of the following criteria are met:

  • The patient is a man or woman, 18 through 65 years of age, with a diagnosis of asthma.
  • The patient has an ACQ score of at least 1.5.
  • At screening, the patient has airway reversibility of at least 12% to beta-agonist administration.
  • The patient is currently taking fluticasone at a dosage of at least 440 µg daily (or equivalent). Patients' baseline asthma therapy regimens (including but not limited to inhaled corticosteroids, leukotriene antagonists, 5-lipoxygenase inhibitors, cromolyn) must be stable for 30 days before screening and continue without dosage changes throughout study.
  • Female patients must be surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal, or must have a negative beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ßHCG) result for a pregnancy test at screening (serum) and baseline (urine).
  • Female patients of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study. Acceptable methods of contraception include barrier method with spermicide, abstinence, intrauterine device (IUD), or steroidal contraceptive (oral, transdermal, implanted, and injected).
  • Written informed consent is obtained.
  • The patient is in reasonable health (except for diagnosis of asthma) as judged by the investigator, and as determined by a medical history, medical examination, electrocardiogram (ECG) evaluation, serum chemistry, hematology, urinalysis, and serology.
  • The patient must be willing and able to comply with study restrictions and to remain at the clinic for the required duration during the study period, and be willing to return to the clinic for the follow-up evaluation as specified in this protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients are excluded from participating in this study if 1 or more of the following criteria are met:

  • The patient has another confounding underlying lung disorder (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary fibrosis, lung cancer). The patient has other pulmonary conditions with symptoms of asthma and blood eosinophilia (eg, Churg-Strauss syndrome, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis).
  • The patient has a clinically meaningful comorbidity that would interfere with the study schedule or procedures, or compromise the patient's safety.
  • The patient has known hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES).
  • The patient is a current smoker (ie, has smoked within the last 6 months prior to screening).
  • The patient has a history of use of systemic immunosuppressive or immunomodulating agents (anti-immunoglobulin E [anti-IgE] mAb, methotrexate, cyclosporin, interferon-α, anti-tumor necrosis factor mAb, or omalizumab) within 6 months prior to study entry (randomization).
  • The patient is currently using or has used systemic corticosteroids (includes use of oral corticosteroids) within 30 days prior to the screening visit.
  • The patient is expected to be poorly compliant with study drug administration, study procedures, or visits.
  • The patient has any aggravating factors that are inadequately controlled, and thus would aggravate asthma symptoms (eg, gastroesophageal reflux disease).
  • The patient has participated in any investigative drug or device study within 30 days prior to screening.
  • The patient has participated in any investigative biologics study within 90 days prior to screening.
  • The patient has previously received reslizumab or other anti-hIL-5 mAbs (eg, mepolizumab).
  • The patient is a pregnant or lactating woman. (Any women becoming pregnant during the study will be withdrawn from the study.)
  • The patient has a current infection or disease that may preclude assessment of asthma.
  • The patient has a history of concurrent immunodeficiency (human immunodeficiency, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, or congenital immunodeficiency).
  • The patient is suspected of current drug or alcohol abuse as specified in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria.
  • The patient has presence of or suspected parasitic infestation/infection.
  • Patients may not have received any live attenuated vaccine within the 12-week period before study entry.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 네 배로

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
위약 비교기: Placebo
Placebo intravenous injection every 4 weeks for a total of 4 doses.
Matching placebo administered by intravenous (iv) infusion by qualified study personnel every 4 weeks for 16 weeks (for a total of 4 doses).
실험적: Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg
Reslizumab intravenous injection at a dosage of 3.0 mg/kg every 4 weeks for a total of 4 doses.
Reslizumab administered at a dosage of 3.0 mg/kg by intravenous (iv) infusion by qualified study personnel every 4 weeks for 16 weeks (for a total of 4 doses).
다른 이름들:
  • 신퀼
  • 인간화 단클론항체
  • CEP-38072

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 16 in Full Analysis Set
기간: Baseline (Day 1), Week 16

FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry.

Data represent the slope estimate of change from baseline in FEV1 (measured in liters) at Week 16 versus baseline eosinophil count (measured in 10^9/liter) by treatment group.

Baseline (Day 1), Week 16

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
기간: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16

FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.

During study (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average value was calculated using a mixed effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment (reslizumab or placebo), blood eosinophil count at baseline, and the interaction of treatment and eosinophil count as a random effect.

Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
기간: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16

The ACQ score was measured using the ACQ-7. Six questions are-self assessments; the seventh item is the result of the patient's % predicted FEV1 measurement. Each item has 7 possible answers on a scale of 0 to 6, and the total score is the mean of all responses (the total scale is therefore 0-6). A score of 0 indicates good asthma control; higher scores indicate increasingly poorer asthma control. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.

During study (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average value was calculated from mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, history of asthma exacerbation in the previous year, height, baseline value, and sex as fixed factors, and patient as a random effect.

Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 16 in FEV1 Subpopulation
기간: Baseline (Day 1), Week 16

FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry.

As with the primary outcome, data represent the slope estimate of change from baseline in FEV1 (measured in liters) at Week 16 versus baseline eosinophil count (measured in 10^9/liter) by treatment group. However the FEV1 subpopulation includes participants with more impaired lung function (% predicted FEV1 <85% at baseline).

Baseline (Day 1), Week 16
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
기간: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint
기간: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
The percent predicted FEV1 is the ratio of the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration to the patient's predicted FEV based on a similar population without asthma. Percent predicted lung function values were transcribed directly from the lung function report to the CRF, without any calculation by Teva. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
기간: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
The FVC is the volume of air that can be forcibly blown out after full inspiration, measured in liters. FV was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Change From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
기간: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
The FEF25%-75% is the forced expiratory flow at 25% to 75% of the forced vital capacity. FEF25%-75% was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
기간: Baseline (Day -2 to 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
SABA are used for quick relief of asthma symptoms. The number of times SABA therapy was used was assessed using 3 day recall at scheduled visits. Participants were asked to recall whether SABAs were used within 3 days of the scheduled visit and, if so, how many puffs were used. Daily use was the average of those 3 days. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Baseline (Day -2 to 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and Endpoint
기간: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28)
Blood eosinophil counts were measured using a standard complete blood count with differential blood test at each scheduled visit. Follow-up was performed approximately 12 weeks after the 16 week treatment period. Endpoint is the last post-baseline assessment.
Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28)
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16
기간: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16
The ACQ score was measured using the ACQ-7. Six questions are self-assessments; the seventh item is the result of the patient's % predicted FEV1 measurement. Each item has 7 possible answers on a scale of 0 to 6, and the total score is the mean of all responses (the total scale is therefore 0-6). A score of 0 indicates good asthma control; higher scores indicate increasingly poorer asthma control. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
기간: Day 1 to Week 28
An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
Day 1 to Week 28
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values
기간: Week 4 to Week 16

Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) abnormal serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis values during any of the lab tests conducted during the treatment period.

Significance criteria:

  • Blood urea nitrogen: >=10.71 mmol/L
  • Creatinine: >=177 μmol/L
  • Uric acid: M>=625, F>=506 μmol/L
  • Aspartate aminotransferase: >=3*upper limit of normal (ULN). Normal range is 10-43 U/L
  • Alanine aminotransferase: >=3*ULN. Normal range is 10-40 U/L
  • GGT = gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase: >= 3*ULN. Normal range is 4-49 U/L.
  • Total bilirubin: >=34.2 μmol/L
  • Creatinine phosphokinase: >5*ULN. Normal range is 24-207 U/L.
  • White blood cells: <=3.0 or >20 10^9/L
  • Hemoglobin: M<=115, F<=95 g/dL
  • Hematocrit: M<0.37, F<0.32 L/L
  • Platelets: <=75 10^9/L
  • Absolute neutrophil count: <=1.0 10^9/L
  • Urinalysis: blood, glucose, ketones and total protein: >=2 unit increase from baseline
Week 4 to Week 16
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values
기간: Week 4 to Week 28

Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values during any of the treatment period exams.

Significance criteria

  • Heart rate - high: >100 and increase of >= 30 beats/minute (bpm)
  • Sitting systolic blood pressure - high: >160 and increase of >=30 mmHg
  • Sitting systolic blood pressure - low: <90 and decrease of >=30 mmHg
  • Sitting diastolic blood pressure - high: >100 and increase of >=12 mmHg
  • Sitting diastolic blood pressure - low: <50 and decrease of >=12 mmHg
  • Body temperature - high: >100.5° Fahrenheit or 38.1° Celsius and increase of >2°
  • Body temperature - low: <96.5° Fahrenheit or <35.8° Celsius
Week 4 to Week 28
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
기간: Week 16 or endpoint
Counts represent the number of participants with potentially clinically significant ECG abnormalities as assessed by the investigator.
Week 16 or endpoint
Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During Study
기간: Screening (Week -3), Weeks 8 and 16

Counts of participants with a positive anti-drug antibody (ADA) response during treatment is offered for the experimental treatment arm. Blood samples were collected for determination of ADAs before study drug infusion at screening, weeks 8 and 16 or early withdrawal. Serum samples from patients who were treated with reslizumab were analyzed for ADA by Teva (Teva Biopharmaceuticals USA, Rockville, MD) using a validated homogeneous solution-based bridging enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Endpoint =week 16 or early withdrawal.

Counts represent the total number of participants at each time point with a positive immunogenicity test, and not 'new' participants with a positive test. An overall status of positive includes participants who had a positive ADA at any time point.

Screening (Week -3), Weeks 8 and 16

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 연구 책임자: Global Respiratory Clinical Research, M.D., Sponsor's Medical Expert

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작

2012년 2월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2013년 8월 1일

연구 완료 (실제)

2013년 8월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2012년 1월 3일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2012년 1월 10일

처음 게시됨 (추정)

2012년 1월 12일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (추정)

2016년 6월 27일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2016년 5월 26일

마지막으로 확인됨

2016년 5월 1일

추가 정보

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

Placebo에 대한 임상 시험

구독하다