A Mixed Methods Approach to the Development and Testing of the Measure of Drug Self-Management (MeDS) (MeDS)
A Mixed Methods Approach to the Development and Testing of the Measure of Drug Self-Management (MeDS), an Assessment for Use in Clinical Settings Among English and Spanish-speaking Patients With Hypertension and Diabetes.
The study objective is to develop and test a Measure of Drug Self-Management for use in clinical settings among patients with hypertension and diabetes.
While medication non-adherence is a highly recognized public health and patient safety concern, it is rarely assessed in a routine and consistent manner in clinical settings. With the aging of the US population and rising rates of chronic disease, an increasing number of adults are being prescribed multi-drug regimens that require greater self-management skills. Despite the complexity of medication use, adherence has most commonly been measured as a limited set of behaviors (i.e., filling a prescription, taking doses). This emphasis has, over time, simplified how we think of prescription (Rx) medication use and directed attention away from the full range of tasks associated with effective Rx self-management. The field of health literacy research has deconstructed these tasks in considerable detail in recent years, and can offer insight into a more comprehensive measurement of patients' outpatient Rx use.
There is a clear need for a brief, yet inclusive, measure of adherence that can be used in clinical settings to routinely assess patients' use of complex Rx regimens. Such an assessment could be used to guide clinicians in addressing specific patient challenges to safe and appropriate medication use. In response to this need, our study proposes to develop a new assessment of medication self-management. This unique measure will utilize health literacy best practices to promote patient comprehension and ease-of-use; it will also be tailored to patients' actual regimens via electronic health record (EHR) data. Finally, the tool will be available in both English and Spanish to support use among diverse patient populations. Our study aims are to:
- Develop and refine a Measure of Drug Self-Management (MeDS) prototype.
- Inform the content, structure and delivery of the MeDS through targeted discussions with patients, providers and information technology specialists.
- Test the reliability and validity of the MeDS among patients with diabetes and hypertension
H1: The MeDS will strongly correlate with other self-report adherence measures.
연구 개요
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 미국, 27599
- Ambulatory Care Center
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
샘플링 방법
연구 인구
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- be ≥ 18 years old,
- have a diagnosis of diabetes and hypertension,
- be prescribed 3 or more drugs to treat these conditions,
- speak English or Spanish as their primary language,
- have primary responsibility for administering their own medications,
- be a registered UNC patient.
Exclusion Criteria:
- severe, uncorrectable visual, hearing or cognitive impairments that would preclude study consent or participation.
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
코호트 및 개입
그룹/코호트 |
|---|
|
Adult patients with diabetes and hypertension
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Measure of Medication Self-Management (MeDS)
기간: cross-sectional, 1 hour interview after clinic visit
|
The MeDS is an assessment of medication self-management skills.
The MeDS tool has 14 questions, the minimum score is 0 (poor medication self-management skills) and the maximum score is 14 (adequate self-management skills).
The internal consistency of the scale is .72
(cronbach's alpha), which is considered adequate internal consistency.
The MeDS was compared to The Morisky Medication Adherence Scale is one of the most commonly used assessments of medication adherence.
It includes 8 questions that assess various factors that can affect medication use, such as forgetfulness, busyness and side effects.
Scores range from 0 to 8, with lower scores reflecting better adherence.
|
cross-sectional, 1 hour interview after clinic visit
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Stacy C Bailey, PhD MPH, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작
기본 완료 (실제)
연구 완료 (실제)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (추정)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (추정)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .