이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Innovative Approaches for Minor Consent: Consent 2.0

2021년 3월 25일 업데이트: Amelia Knopf, Indiana University

Innovative Approaches for Minor Consent: Consent 2.0 - A Multi-Center Study of the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions (ATN)

The purpose of this study is to examine how the consent process affects the acceptability of participation in biomedical HIV prevention trials, from the perspective of behaviorally high-risk minors and the parents of minor adolescents.

연구 개요

상태

완전한

정황

개입 / 치료

상세 설명

Potential participants will be recruited from clinical settings and HIV testing centers. If interested in participation, they will take a short Computer Assisted Self-Interview (CASI) screening survey to determine eligibility. Those eligible will take part in the one-day study visit at that time or will provide contact information to set up the study visit at a later date.

All study participants will attend a one-day study visit at their respective study site. Upon arrival, participants will complete a CASI that collects demographic, social, behavioral, and attitudinal measures. Next, participants will take part in a simulated consent process for two hypothetical trials modeled after ATN 113 and HPTN 077. Study procedures differ for adolescents and parents, so each group is described separately below:

Adolescent Participants: For each hypothetical trial, research staff will lead the participant through a simulated consent process consistent with their randomized consent condition. Then, the participant will complete a CASI assessing Willingness to Participate (WTP) and will work with research staff to complete the University of San Diego (UCSD) Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC).

Parent Participants: For each hypothetical trial, research staff will review the informed consent forms with the parent. The parent will complete a CASI with three vignettes that describe each of the three possible consent conditions. Parents will rate the acceptability of each vignette. Then, the participant will work with research staff to complete the UCSD Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC). Finally, the participant will answer a series of questions via CASI.

A subset of 6-8 adolescents and 6-8 parents per study site will complete a debriefing interview assessing adolescent and parent perspectives on the various consent conditions in greater depth, and to better understand the role of study features, family, and adolescent characteristics in willingness to participate/willingness to support the hypothetical research studies.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

254

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

  • 미국
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, 미국, 80045
        • Children's Hospital Colorado/Univ of Colorado SOM
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, 미국, 33606
        • University of South Florida
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, 미국, 60637
        • University of Chicago
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, 미국, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins University/SOM

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

14년 (어린이)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

예

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Note: Age limits apply to adolescent participants and to the adolescent children of parent participants.

Adolescent Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 14-17 inclusive
  • Able to read and speak English
  • HIV status is negative or unknown
  • Engaged in high-risk sexual activity in the last six months

Adolescent Exclusion Criteria

  • Child of a parent already enrolled in the study

Parent Inclusion Criteria

  • Able to read and speak English
  • Parent or guardian of an adolescent who is between ages 14-17
  • The parent/guardian's adolescent's HIV status is either negative or unknown

Parent Exclusion Criteria

  • Parent of a child already enrolled in the study

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 다른
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
활성 비교기: Adolescents: Consent Condition 1
Autonomous minor consent
다른: Autonomous minor consent
Consent requirement where the participant is not required to get anyone's permission to participate in the trial.
활성 비교기: Adolescents: Consent Condition 2
Adult permission required
다른: Adult permission required
Consent requirement where the participant is required to obtain an adult's permission to participate in the trial.
활성 비교기: Adolescents: Consent Condition 3
Parental permission required
다른: Parental permission required
Consent requirement where the participant is required to obtain their parent's permission to participate in the trial.
활성 비교기: Parents: Consent Conditions 1-3
Autonomous minor consent, adult permission required, and parental permission required
다른: Autonomous minor consent
Consent requirement where the participant is not required to get anyone's permission to participate in the trial.
다른: Adult permission required
Consent requirement where the participant is required to obtain an adult's permission to participate in the trial.
다른: Parental permission required
Consent requirement where the participant is required to obtain their parent's permission to participate in the trial.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Mean Adolescent WTP Scores
기간: Day 1

Comparing mean adolescent Willingness to Participate (WTP) scores across the three consent conditions and two trial types.

WTP scores are based on the response to the question: "If offered the chance, how likely would you be to participate in the study?" Responses are collected using a Likert scale (definitely not participate, probably not participate, might or might not participate, probably participate, definitely participate) and converted to a numeric score with values ranging from 1 (definitely not participate) to 5 (definitely participate) for analysis.
Day 1
Mean Parent WTS Scores
기간: Day 1

Comparing mean parent Willingness to Support (WTS) scores across the three consent conditions and two trial types.

WTS scores are based on the response to the question: "This is an acceptable approach to consent for your teenager's participation in the study." Responses are collected using a Likert scale (strongly disagree, disagree, neither disagree nor agree, agree, strongly agree) and converted to a numeric score with values ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) for analysis.
Day 1
Effects of the Study Agent (Stage of Development and Method of Delivery) on High-risk Minor Adolescents' WTP Scores
기간: Day 1
This data reflects adolescent Willingness to Participate (WTP) scores by study agent/trial type. After review of hypothetical consent documents for 2 study agents in different stages of development and with different methods of delivery (based on real-world studies ATN 113 and HPTN 077), adolescents are asked "If offered the chance, how likely would you be to participate in the study?" Responses are collected using a Likert scale (definitely not participate, probably not participate, might or might not participate, probably participate, definitely participate) and converted to a numeric score with values ranging from 1 (definitely not participate) to 5 (definitely participate) for analysis.
Day 1
Effects of the Study Agent (Stage of Development and Method of Delivery) on Parents' Acceptability Scores
기간: Day 1
After review of hypothetical consent documents for 2 study agents in different stages of development and with different methods of delivery (based on real-world trials ATN 113 and HPTN 077), parents are presented with vignettes for the 3 different consent conditions (autonomous minor consent, adult permission required, parental permission required) and asked "How acceptable is this approach to research consent?". Responses are collected on a Likert scale (completely unacceptable, unacceptable, neither unacceptable not acceptable, acceptable, completely acceptable) and converted to a numeric score with values ranging from 1 (definitely not acceptable) to 5 (definitely acceptable) for analysis.
Day 1

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

Indiana University

협력자

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Amy Knopf, PhD, MPH, RN, Indiana University School of Medicine
  • 연구 책임자: Matthew Psioda, PhD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2017년 11월 7일

기본 완료 (실제)

2019년 9월 15일

연구 완료 (실제)

2019년 9월 15일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2017년 8월 3일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2017년 8월 3일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2017년 8월 8일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2021년 4월 22일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2021년 3월 25일

마지막으로 확인됨

2021년 3월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • 17-0538
  • 5U24HD089880-02 (미국 NIH 보조금/계약)

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

예

IPD 계획 설명

De-identified study data will be made available in the NICHD Data and Specimen Hub (DASH), a centralized resource for researchers to store de-identified data from NICHD supported studies for use in secondary research. NICHD DASH is a free public resource designed for the scientific research community.

IPD 공유 기간

Data will be made available after data analyses have been completed, data has been de-identified, and all DASH submission requirements have been met and approved. Data will be available according to NICHD DASH timelines.

IPD 공유 액세스 기준

Please see DASH guidelines for access criteria.

IPD 공유 지원 정보 유형

  • 연구_프로토콜
  • 수액

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

에이즈에 대한 임상 시험

Autonomous minor consent에 대한 임상 시험

유사한 임상시험 검색

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

CROs by country

CROs in Montenegro

정황

희귀 질병

약물 개입

식이 보충제

스폰서 / 협력자

위치

3
구독하다