Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Innovative Approaches for Minor Consent: Consent 2.0

25 maart 2021 bijgewerkt door: Amelia Knopf, Indiana University

Innovative Approaches for Minor Consent: Consent 2.0 - A Multi-Center Study of the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions (ATN)

The purpose of this study is to examine how the consent process affects the acceptability of participation in biomedical HIV prevention trials, from the perspective of behaviorally high-risk minors and the parents of minor adolescents.

Studie Overzicht

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

Potential participants will be recruited from clinical settings and HIV testing centers. If interested in participation, they will take a short Computer Assisted Self-Interview (CASI) screening survey to determine eligibility. Those eligible will take part in the one-day study visit at that time or will provide contact information to set up the study visit at a later date.

All study participants will attend a one-day study visit at their respective study site. Upon arrival, participants will complete a CASI that collects demographic, social, behavioral, and attitudinal measures. Next, participants will take part in a simulated consent process for two hypothetical trials modeled after ATN 113 and HPTN 077. Study procedures differ for adolescents and parents, so each group is described separately below:

Adolescent Participants: For each hypothetical trial, research staff will lead the participant through a simulated consent process consistent with their randomized consent condition. Then, the participant will complete a CASI assessing Willingness to Participate (WTP) and will work with research staff to complete the University of San Diego (UCSD) Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC).

Parent Participants: For each hypothetical trial, research staff will review the informed consent forms with the parent. The parent will complete a CASI with three vignettes that describe each of the three possible consent conditions. Parents will rate the acceptability of each vignette. Then, the participant will work with research staff to complete the UCSD Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC). Finally, the participant will answer a series of questions via CASI.

A subset of 6-8 adolescents and 6-8 parents per study site will complete a debriefing interview assessing adolescent and parent perspectives on the various consent conditions in greater depth, and to better understand the role of study features, family, and adolescent characteristics in willingness to participate/willingness to support the hypothetical research studies.

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

254

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80045
        • Children's Hospital Colorado/Univ of Colorado SOM
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, Verenigde Staten, 33606
        • University of South Florida
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, Verenigde Staten, 60637
        • University of Chicago
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, Verenigde Staten, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins University/SOM

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

14 jaar tot 17 jaar (Kind)

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Ja

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Beschrijving

Note: Age limits apply to adolescent participants and to the adolescent children of parent participants.

Adolescent Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 14-17 inclusive
  • Able to read and speak English
  • HIV status is negative or unknown
  • Engaged in high-risk sexual activity in the last six months

Adolescent Exclusion Criteria

  • Child of a parent already enrolled in the study

Parent Inclusion Criteria

  • Able to read and speak English
  • Parent or guardian of an adolescent who is between ages 14-17
  • The parent/guardian's adolescent's HIV status is either negative or unknown

Parent Exclusion Criteria

  • Parent of a child already enrolled in the study

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Ander
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Geen (open label)

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Actieve vergelijker: Adolescents: Consent Condition 1
Autonomous minor consent
Consent requirement where the participant is not required to get anyone's permission to participate in the trial.
Actieve vergelijker: Adolescents: Consent Condition 2
Adult permission required
Consent requirement where the participant is required to obtain an adult's permission to participate in the trial.
Actieve vergelijker: Adolescents: Consent Condition 3
Parental permission required
Consent requirement where the participant is required to obtain their parent's permission to participate in the trial.
Actieve vergelijker: Parents: Consent Conditions 1-3
Autonomous minor consent, adult permission required, and parental permission required
Consent requirement where the participant is not required to get anyone's permission to participate in the trial.
Consent requirement where the participant is required to obtain an adult's permission to participate in the trial.
Consent requirement where the participant is required to obtain their parent's permission to participate in the trial.

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Mean Adolescent WTP Scores
Tijdsspanne: Day 1

Comparing mean adolescent Willingness to Participate (WTP) scores across the three consent conditions and two trial types.

WTP scores are based on the response to the question: "If offered the chance, how likely would you be to participate in the study?" Responses are collected using a Likert scale (definitely not participate, probably not participate, might or might not participate, probably participate, definitely participate) and converted to a numeric score with values ranging from 1 (definitely not participate) to 5 (definitely participate) for analysis.

Day 1
Mean Parent WTS Scores
Tijdsspanne: Day 1

Comparing mean parent Willingness to Support (WTS) scores across the three consent conditions and two trial types.

WTS scores are based on the response to the question: "This is an acceptable approach to consent for your teenager's participation in the study." Responses are collected using a Likert scale (strongly disagree, disagree, neither disagree nor agree, agree, strongly agree) and converted to a numeric score with values ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) for analysis.

Day 1
Effects of the Study Agent (Stage of Development and Method of Delivery) on High-risk Minor Adolescents' WTP Scores
Tijdsspanne: Day 1
This data reflects adolescent Willingness to Participate (WTP) scores by study agent/trial type. After review of hypothetical consent documents for 2 study agents in different stages of development and with different methods of delivery (based on real-world studies ATN 113 and HPTN 077), adolescents are asked "If offered the chance, how likely would you be to participate in the study?" Responses are collected using a Likert scale (definitely not participate, probably not participate, might or might not participate, probably participate, definitely participate) and converted to a numeric score with values ranging from 1 (definitely not participate) to 5 (definitely participate) for analysis.
Day 1
Effects of the Study Agent (Stage of Development and Method of Delivery) on Parents' Acceptability Scores
Tijdsspanne: Day 1
After review of hypothetical consent documents for 2 study agents in different stages of development and with different methods of delivery (based on real-world trials ATN 113 and HPTN 077), parents are presented with vignettes for the 3 different consent conditions (autonomous minor consent, adult permission required, parental permission required) and asked "How acceptable is this approach to research consent?". Responses are collected on a Likert scale (completely unacceptable, unacceptable, neither unacceptable not acceptable, acceptable, completely acceptable) and converted to a numeric score with values ranging from 1 (definitely not acceptable) to 5 (definitely acceptable) for analysis.
Day 1

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Onderzoekers

  • Hoofdonderzoeker: Amy Knopf, PhD, MPH, RN, Indiana University School of Medicine
  • Studie directeur: Matthew Psioda, PhD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Werkelijk)

7 november 2017

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

15 september 2019

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

15 september 2019

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

3 augustus 2017

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

3 augustus 2017

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

8 augustus 2017

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

22 april 2021

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

25 maart 2021

Laatst geverifieerd

1 maart 2021

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • 17-0538
  • 5U24HD089880-02 (Subsidie/contract van de Amerikaanse NIH)

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

JA

Beschrijving IPD-plan

De-identified study data will be made available in the NICHD Data and Specimen Hub (DASH), a centralized resource for researchers to store de-identified data from NICHD supported studies for use in secondary research. NICHD DASH is a free public resource designed for the scientific research community.

IPD-tijdsbestek voor delen

Data will be made available after data analyses have been completed, data has been de-identified, and all DASH submission requirements have been met and approved. Data will be available according to NICHD DASH timelines.

IPD-toegangscriteria voor delen

Please see DASH guidelines for access criteria.

IPD delen Ondersteunend informatietype

  • LEERPROTOCOOL
  • SAP

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Klinische onderzoeken op Hiv

Klinische onderzoeken op Autonomous minor consent

3
Abonneren