Disseminating Effective Sexual Health Programs in Schools Using iCHAMPSS
2026년 6월 29일 업데이트: Belinda Hernandez, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of iCHAMPSS 2.0 in impacting Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) implementation outcomes, with implementation of a sexual health evidence-based program (EBP) assess iCHAMPSS 2.0's efficacy in impacting determinants of sexual health EBP implementation and to conduct a process evaluation to monitor iCHAMPSS 2.0 implementation, reach, dosage, and barriers and facilitators to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 during the study.
연구 개요
연구 유형
중재적
등록 (추정된)
75
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.
연구 연락처
- 이름: Belinda Hernandez, PhD, MPH
- 전화번호: (210) 276-9009
- 이메일: Belinda.Hernandez@uth.tmc.edu
연구 연락처 백업
- 이름: Laura Thormaehlen
- 전화번호: (713) 500-9000
- 이메일: Laura.C.Thormaehlen@uth.tmc.edu
연구 장소
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, 미국, 77030
- 모병
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
-
연락하다:
- Belinda Hernandez, PhD, MPH
- 전화번호: (210) 276-9009
- 이메일: Belinda.Hernandez@uth.tmc.edu
-
연락하다:
- Laura Thormaehlen
- 전화번호: (713) 500-9000
- 이메일: Laura.C.Thormaehlen@uth.tmc.edu
-
-
참여기준
연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
- 어린이
- 성인
- 고령자
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
예
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Licensed educator or administrator who holds one of the following positions: 1) district or school administrator (e.g., health coordinators, instructional specialists, and curriculum coordinators), 2) health and physical education teachers, and 3) social and health service staff (e.g., nurses and counselors) in a Texas school district participating in the iCHAMPSS 2.0 study
Exclusion Criteria:
- not holding a job in a Texas school district as a school stakeholder, OR holding a job in a Texas school district as a school stakeholder but not in a school district participating in the iCHAMPSS 2.0 study
공부 계획
이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 방지
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 크로스오버 할당
- 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Arm 1: 1 semester of implementation then 7 semesters of intervention
|
iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education. iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:
|
|
실험적: Arm 2: 1 semester of control, 1 semester of implementation then 7 semesters of intervention
|
iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education. iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:
|
|
실험적: Arm 3: 1 semesters of control, 1 semester of implementation then 6 semesters of intervention
|
iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education. iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
기간 |
|---|---|
|
Change in percentage of schools within a district implementing an EBP
기간: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Rate of implementation of the EBP
기간: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of School Health Advisory Councils (SHACs) that have recommended a sexual health EBP to their school board
기간: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Percentage of School Health Advisory Councils (SHACs) that have adopted a sexual health EBP to their school board
기간: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Percentage of schools with the school board's approval of an Evidence Based Program (EBP)
기간: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Percentage of schools with the principal's approval of an EBP
기간: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Percentage of students receiving majority (over 50%) of a sexual health EBP
기간: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Percentage of schools that have implemented the evidence-based program for more than one academic year as assessed by the implementation survey
기간: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Change in perceived complexity as assessed by the staff survey
기간: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 3 item questionnaire and each is scored form (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score of 15, higher score indicating worse outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in compatibility as assessed by the staff survey
기간: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 5 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree maximum score 25, higher score indicating better outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in relative advantage as assessed by the staff survey
기간: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score of 20, higher score indicating better better outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in perceived social systems support in parent community as assessed by the staff survey
기간: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 8 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) not at all supportive to (4) very supportive , maximum score of 32 , higher score indicating better outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in presence of school policy as assessed by the staff survey
기간: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 2 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 10, higher score indicating better outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in adequate resources as assessed by the staff survey
기간: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 5 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score of 25, higher score indicating better outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in presence of a program champion as assessed by the staff survey
기간: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in implementation climate as assessed by the staff survey
기간: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 6 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score of 30, higher score indicating better outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in inter organizational relationships as assessed by the staff survey
기간: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in intra organizational relationships as assessed by the staff survey
기간: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in perceived need as assessed by the staff survey
기간: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score range of 20, higher score indicating worse outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in self-efficacy as assessed by the staff survey
기간: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 19 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(not at all confident)-4(very confident) , maximum score range of 76, higher score indicating better outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Frequency of use of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
기간: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Time spent using iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the district coordinator survey
기간: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
This will be reported categorically as less than one hour, 1-2 hours, 3-4 hours, 5-6 hours and 7 hours or more
|
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
|
Number of recurring users of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
기간: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Number of unique users of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
기간: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Mean number of users per school district of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
기간: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Percentage of school districts/schools using iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
기간: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Percentage of iCHAMPSS 2.0 tools used in each step as assessed by the website analytics
기간: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Perceived barriers to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the coordinator interviews and district coordinator surveys
기간: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
This will be reported as a percentage
|
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
|
Perceived facilitators to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the coordinator interviews and district coordinator surveys
기간: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
This will be reported as a percentage
|
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Belinda Hernandez, PhD, MPH, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
연구 기록 날짜
이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
2026년 4월 2일
기본 완료 (추정된)
2028년 4월 1일
연구 완료 (추정된)
2028년 4월 1일
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
2026년 4월 9일
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
2026년 6월 29일
처음 게시됨 (실제)
2026년 7월 1일
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
2026년 7월 1일
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
2026년 6월 29일
마지막으로 확인됨
2026년 4월 1일
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
키워드
기타 연구 ID 번호
- HSC-SPH-24-0672
- R01HD111699 (미국 NIH 보조금/계약)
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
아니요
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
아니
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
아니
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .