Tämä sivu käännettiin automaattisesti, eikä käännösten tarkkuutta voida taata. Katso englanninkielinen versio lähdetekstiä varten.

Disseminating Effective Sexual Health Programs in Schools Using iCHAMPSS

maanantai 29. kesäkuuta 2026 päivittänyt: Belinda Hernandez, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of iCHAMPSS 2.0 in impacting Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) implementation outcomes, with implementation of a sexual health evidence-based program (EBP) assess iCHAMPSS 2.0's efficacy in impacting determinants of sexual health EBP implementation and to conduct a process evaluation to monitor iCHAMPSS 2.0 implementation, reach, dosage, and barriers and facilitators to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 during the study.

Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus

Tila

Rekrytointi

Ehdot

Interventio / Hoito

Opintotyyppi

Interventio

Ilmoittautuminen (Arvioitu)

75

Vaihe

  • Ei sovellettavissa

Yhteystiedot ja paikat

Tässä osiossa on tutkimuksen suorittajien yhteystiedot ja tiedot siitä, missä tämä tutkimus suoritetaan.

Opiskeluyhteys

Tutki yhteystietojen varmuuskopiointi

Opiskelupaikat

Osallistumiskriteerit

Tutkijat etsivät ihmisiä, jotka sopivat tiettyyn kuvaukseen, jota kutsutaan kelpoisuuskriteereiksi. Joitakin esimerkkejä näistä kriteereistä ovat henkilön yleinen terveydentila tai aiemmat hoidot.

Kelpoisuusvaatimukset

Opintokelpoiset iät

  • Lapsi
  • Aikuinen
  • Vanhempi Aikuinen

Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia

Joo

Kuvaus

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Licensed educator or administrator who holds one of the following positions: 1) district or school administrator (e.g., health coordinators, instructional specialists, and curriculum coordinators), 2) health and physical education teachers, and 3) social and health service staff (e.g., nurses and counselors) in a Texas school district participating in the iCHAMPSS 2.0 study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not holding a job in a Texas school district as a school stakeholder, OR holding a job in a Texas school district as a school stakeholder but not in a school district participating in the iCHAMPSS 2.0 study

Opintosuunnitelma

Tässä osiossa on tietoja tutkimussuunnitelmasta, mukaan lukien kuinka tutkimus on suunniteltu ja mitä tutkimuksella mitataan.

Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?

Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat

  • Ensisijainen käyttötarkoitus: Ennaltaehkäisy
  • Jako: Satunnaistettu
  • Inventiomalli: Crossover-tehtävä
  • Naamiointi: Ei mitään (avoin tarra)

Aseet ja interventiot

Osallistujaryhmä / Arm
Interventio / Hoito
Kokeellinen: Arm 1: 1 semester of implementation then 7 semesters of intervention
Käyttäytyminen: iCHAMPSS 2.0

iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education.

iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:

  1. the CHAMPSS Model tutorial, which familiarizes Champions with the iCHAMPSS 2.0 system
  2. a Staging Tool, which helps Champions understand their school's level of readiness to adopt, implement, and maintain a sexual health EBP, and can tailor their experience
  3. a tools library, which includes a suite of over 60 decision support tools
  4. an interactive linkage system, which is an online platform to help Champions connect with others and to receive technical assistance (TA)
Kokeellinen: Arm 2: 1 semester of control, 1 semester of implementation then 7 semesters of intervention
Käyttäytyminen: iCHAMPSS 2.0

iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education.

iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:

  1. the CHAMPSS Model tutorial, which familiarizes Champions with the iCHAMPSS 2.0 system
  2. a Staging Tool, which helps Champions understand their school's level of readiness to adopt, implement, and maintain a sexual health EBP, and can tailor their experience
  3. a tools library, which includes a suite of over 60 decision support tools
  4. an interactive linkage system, which is an online platform to help Champions connect with others and to receive technical assistance (TA)
Kokeellinen: Arm 3: 1 semesters of control, 1 semester of implementation then 6 semesters of intervention
Käyttäytyminen: iCHAMPSS 2.0

iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education.

iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:

  1. the CHAMPSS Model tutorial, which familiarizes Champions with the iCHAMPSS 2.0 system
  2. a Staging Tool, which helps Champions understand their school's level of readiness to adopt, implement, and maintain a sexual health EBP, and can tailor their experience
  3. a tools library, which includes a suite of over 60 decision support tools
  4. an interactive linkage system, which is an online platform to help Champions connect with others and to receive technical assistance (TA)

Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?

Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Aikaikkuna
Change in percentage of schools within a district implementing an EBP
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Rate of implementation of the EBP
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
Percentage of School Health Advisory Councils (SHACs) that have recommended a sexual health EBP to their school board
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of School Health Advisory Councils (SHACs) that have adopted a sexual health EBP to their school board
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of schools with the school board's approval of an Evidence Based Program (EBP)
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of schools with the principal's approval of an EBP
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of students receiving majority (over 50%) of a sexual health EBP
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of schools that have implemented the evidence-based program for more than one academic year as assessed by the implementation survey
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in perceived complexity as assessed by the staff survey
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 3 item questionnaire and each is scored form (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score of 15, higher score indicating worse outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in compatibility as assessed by the staff survey
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 5 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree maximum score 25, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in relative advantage as assessed by the staff survey
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score of 20, higher score indicating better better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in perceived social systems support in parent community as assessed by the staff survey
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 8 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) not at all supportive to (4) very supportive , maximum score of 32 , higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in presence of school policy as assessed by the staff survey
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 2 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 10, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in adequate resources as assessed by the staff survey
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 5 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score of 25, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in presence of a program champion as assessed by the staff survey
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in implementation climate as assessed by the staff survey
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 6 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score of 30, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in inter organizational relationships as assessed by the staff survey
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in intra organizational relationships as assessed by the staff survey
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in perceived need as assessed by the staff survey
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score range of 20, higher score indicating worse outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in self-efficacy as assessed by the staff survey
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 19 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(not at all confident)-4(very confident) , maximum score range of 76, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Frequency of use of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Time spent using iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the district coordinator survey
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
This will be reported categorically as less than one hour, 1-2 hours, 3-4 hours, 5-6 hours and 7 hours or more
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Number of recurring users of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Number of unique users of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Mean number of users per school district of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Percentage of school districts/schools using iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Percentage of iCHAMPSS 2.0 tools used in each step as assessed by the website analytics
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Perceived barriers to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the coordinator interviews and district coordinator surveys
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
This will be reported as a percentage
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Perceived facilitators to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the coordinator interviews and district coordinator surveys
Aikaikkuna: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
This will be reported as a percentage
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)

Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat

Täältä löydät tähän tutkimukseen osallistuvat ihmiset ja organisaatiot.

Sponsori

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Yhteistyökumppanit

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Tutkijat

  • Päätutkija: Belinda Hernandez, PhD, MPH, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Opintojen ennätyspäivät

Nämä päivämäärät seuraavat ClinicalTrials.gov-sivustolle lähetettyjen tutkimustietueiden ja yhteenvetojen edistymistä. National Library of Medicine (NLM) tarkistaa tutkimustiedot ja raportoidut tulokset varmistaakseen, että ne täyttävät tietyt laadunvalvontastandardit, ennen kuin ne julkaistaan ​​julkisella verkkosivustolla.

Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät

Opiskelun aloitus (Todellinen)

Torstai 2. huhtikuuta 2026

Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Arvioitu)

Lauantai 1. huhtikuuta 2028

Opintojen valmistuminen (Arvioitu)

Lauantai 1. huhtikuuta 2028

Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät

Ensimmäinen lähetetty

Torstai 9. huhtikuuta 2026

Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Maanantai 29. kesäkuuta 2026

Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Todellinen)

Keskiviikko 1. heinäkuuta 2026

Tutkimustietojen päivitykset

Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Todellinen)

Keskiviikko 1. heinäkuuta 2026

Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Maanantai 29. kesäkuuta 2026

Viimeksi vahvistettu

Keskiviikko 1. huhtikuuta 2026

Lisää tietoa

Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit

Avainsanat

Muut tutkimustunnusnumerot

  • HSC-SPH-24-0672
  • R01HD111699 (Yhdysvaltain NIH-apuraha/sopimus)

Yksittäisten osallistujien tietojen suunnitelma (IPD)

Aiotko jakaa yksittäisten osallistujien tietoja (IPD)?

EI

Lääke- ja laitetiedot, tutkimusasiakirjat

Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää lääkevalmistetta

Ei

Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää laitetuotetta

Ei

Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .

Tilaa