Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Disseminating Effective Sexual Health Programs in Schools Using iCHAMPSS

29. juni 2026 oppdatert av: Belinda Hernandez, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of iCHAMPSS 2.0 in impacting Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) implementation outcomes, with implementation of a sexual health evidence-based program (EBP) assess iCHAMPSS 2.0's efficacy in impacting determinants of sexual health EBP implementation and to conduct a process evaluation to monitor iCHAMPSS 2.0 implementation, reach, dosage, and barriers and facilitators to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 during the study.

Studieoversikt

Status

Rekruttering

Forhold

Intervensjon / Behandling

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Antatt)

75

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiekontakt

Studer Kontakt Backup

Studiesteder

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Barn
  • Voksen
  • Eldre voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Ja

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Licensed educator or administrator who holds one of the following positions: 1) district or school administrator (e.g., health coordinators, instructional specialists, and curriculum coordinators), 2) health and physical education teachers, and 3) social and health service staff (e.g., nurses and counselors) in a Texas school district participating in the iCHAMPSS 2.0 study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not holding a job in a Texas school district as a school stakeholder, OR holding a job in a Texas school district as a school stakeholder but not in a school district participating in the iCHAMPSS 2.0 study

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Forebygging
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Crossover-oppdrag
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Arm 1: 1 semester of implementation then 7 semesters of intervention
Atferdsmessig: iCHAMPSS 2.0

iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education.

iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:

  1. the CHAMPSS Model tutorial, which familiarizes Champions with the iCHAMPSS 2.0 system
  2. a Staging Tool, which helps Champions understand their school's level of readiness to adopt, implement, and maintain a sexual health EBP, and can tailor their experience
  3. a tools library, which includes a suite of over 60 decision support tools
  4. an interactive linkage system, which is an online platform to help Champions connect with others and to receive technical assistance (TA)
Eksperimentell: Arm 2: 1 semester of control, 1 semester of implementation then 7 semesters of intervention
Atferdsmessig: iCHAMPSS 2.0

iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education.

iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:

  1. the CHAMPSS Model tutorial, which familiarizes Champions with the iCHAMPSS 2.0 system
  2. a Staging Tool, which helps Champions understand their school's level of readiness to adopt, implement, and maintain a sexual health EBP, and can tailor their experience
  3. a tools library, which includes a suite of over 60 decision support tools
  4. an interactive linkage system, which is an online platform to help Champions connect with others and to receive technical assistance (TA)
Eksperimentell: Arm 3: 1 semesters of control, 1 semester of implementation then 6 semesters of intervention
Atferdsmessig: iCHAMPSS 2.0

iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education.

iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:

  1. the CHAMPSS Model tutorial, which familiarizes Champions with the iCHAMPSS 2.0 system
  2. a Staging Tool, which helps Champions understand their school's level of readiness to adopt, implement, and maintain a sexual health EBP, and can tailor their experience
  3. a tools library, which includes a suite of over 60 decision support tools
  4. an interactive linkage system, which is an online platform to help Champions connect with others and to receive technical assistance (TA)

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tidsramme
Change in percentage of schools within a district implementing an EBP
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Rate of implementation of the EBP
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Percentage of School Health Advisory Councils (SHACs) that have recommended a sexual health EBP to their school board
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of School Health Advisory Councils (SHACs) that have adopted a sexual health EBP to their school board
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of schools with the school board's approval of an Evidence Based Program (EBP)
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of schools with the principal's approval of an EBP
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of students receiving majority (over 50%) of a sexual health EBP
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of schools that have implemented the evidence-based program for more than one academic year as assessed by the implementation survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in perceived complexity as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 3 item questionnaire and each is scored form (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score of 15, higher score indicating worse outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in compatibility as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 5 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree maximum score 25, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in relative advantage as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score of 20, higher score indicating better better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in perceived social systems support in parent community as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 8 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) not at all supportive to (4) very supportive , maximum score of 32 , higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in presence of school policy as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 2 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 10, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in adequate resources as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 5 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score of 25, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in presence of a program champion as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in implementation climate as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 6 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score of 30, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in inter organizational relationships as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in intra organizational relationships as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in perceived need as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score range of 20, higher score indicating worse outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in self-efficacy as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 19 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(not at all confident)-4(very confident) , maximum score range of 76, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Frequency of use of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Time spent using iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the district coordinator survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
This will be reported categorically as less than one hour, 1-2 hours, 3-4 hours, 5-6 hours and 7 hours or more
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Number of recurring users of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Number of unique users of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Mean number of users per school district of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Percentage of school districts/schools using iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Percentage of iCHAMPSS 2.0 tools used in each step as assessed by the website analytics
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Perceived barriers to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the coordinator interviews and district coordinator surveys
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
This will be reported as a percentage
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Perceived facilitators to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the coordinator interviews and district coordinator surveys
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
This will be reported as a percentage
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Samarbeidspartnere

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Belinda Hernandez, PhD, MPH, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

2. april 2026

Primær fullføring (Antatt)

1. april 2028

Studiet fullført (Antatt)

1. april 2028

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

9. april 2026

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

29. juni 2026

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

1. juli 2026

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

1. juli 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

29. juni 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. april 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Nøkkelord

Andre studie-ID-numre

  • HSC-SPH-24-0672
  • R01HD111699 (U.S. NIH-stipend/kontrakt)

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

NEI

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere