Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Disseminating Effective Sexual Health Programs in Schools Using iCHAMPSS

29. Juni 2026 aktualisiert von: Belinda Hernandez, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of iCHAMPSS 2.0 in impacting Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) implementation outcomes, with implementation of a sexual health evidence-based program (EBP) assess iCHAMPSS 2.0's efficacy in impacting determinants of sexual health EBP implementation and to conduct a process evaluation to monitor iCHAMPSS 2.0 implementation, reach, dosage, and barriers and facilitators to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 during the study.

Studienübersicht

Status

Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

75

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung

Studienorte

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Kind
  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Licensed educator or administrator who holds one of the following positions: 1) district or school administrator (e.g., health coordinators, instructional specialists, and curriculum coordinators), 2) health and physical education teachers, and 3) social and health service staff (e.g., nurses and counselors) in a Texas school district participating in the iCHAMPSS 2.0 study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not holding a job in a Texas school district as a school stakeholder, OR holding a job in a Texas school district as a school stakeholder but not in a school district participating in the iCHAMPSS 2.0 study

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Verhütung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Crossover-Aufgabe
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Arm 1: 1 semester of implementation then 7 semesters of intervention
Verhalten: iCHAMPSS 2.0

iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education.

iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:

  1. the CHAMPSS Model tutorial, which familiarizes Champions with the iCHAMPSS 2.0 system
  2. a Staging Tool, which helps Champions understand their school's level of readiness to adopt, implement, and maintain a sexual health EBP, and can tailor their experience
  3. a tools library, which includes a suite of over 60 decision support tools
  4. an interactive linkage system, which is an online platform to help Champions connect with others and to receive technical assistance (TA)
Experimental: Arm 2: 1 semester of control, 1 semester of implementation then 7 semesters of intervention
Verhalten: iCHAMPSS 2.0

iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education.

iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:

  1. the CHAMPSS Model tutorial, which familiarizes Champions with the iCHAMPSS 2.0 system
  2. a Staging Tool, which helps Champions understand their school's level of readiness to adopt, implement, and maintain a sexual health EBP, and can tailor their experience
  3. a tools library, which includes a suite of over 60 decision support tools
  4. an interactive linkage system, which is an online platform to help Champions connect with others and to receive technical assistance (TA)
Experimental: Arm 3: 1 semesters of control, 1 semester of implementation then 6 semesters of intervention
Verhalten: iCHAMPSS 2.0

iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education.

iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:

  1. the CHAMPSS Model tutorial, which familiarizes Champions with the iCHAMPSS 2.0 system
  2. a Staging Tool, which helps Champions understand their school's level of readiness to adopt, implement, and maintain a sexual health EBP, and can tailor their experience
  3. a tools library, which includes a suite of over 60 decision support tools
  4. an interactive linkage system, which is an online platform to help Champions connect with others and to receive technical assistance (TA)

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Zeitfenster
Change in percentage of schools within a district implementing an EBP
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Rate of implementation of the EBP
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Percentage of School Health Advisory Councils (SHACs) that have recommended a sexual health EBP to their school board
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of School Health Advisory Councils (SHACs) that have adopted a sexual health EBP to their school board
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of schools with the school board's approval of an Evidence Based Program (EBP)
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of schools with the principal's approval of an EBP
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of students receiving majority (over 50%) of a sexual health EBP
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of schools that have implemented the evidence-based program for more than one academic year as assessed by the implementation survey
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in perceived complexity as assessed by the staff survey
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 3 item questionnaire and each is scored form (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score of 15, higher score indicating worse outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in compatibility as assessed by the staff survey
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 5 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree maximum score 25, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in relative advantage as assessed by the staff survey
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score of 20, higher score indicating better better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in perceived social systems support in parent community as assessed by the staff survey
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 8 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) not at all supportive to (4) very supportive , maximum score of 32 , higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in presence of school policy as assessed by the staff survey
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 2 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 10, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in adequate resources as assessed by the staff survey
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 5 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score of 25, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in presence of a program champion as assessed by the staff survey
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in implementation climate as assessed by the staff survey
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 6 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score of 30, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in inter organizational relationships as assessed by the staff survey
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in intra organizational relationships as assessed by the staff survey
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in perceived need as assessed by the staff survey
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score range of 20, higher score indicating worse outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in self-efficacy as assessed by the staff survey
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 19 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(not at all confident)-4(very confident) , maximum score range of 76, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Frequency of use of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Time spent using iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the district coordinator survey
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
This will be reported categorically as less than one hour, 1-2 hours, 3-4 hours, 5-6 hours and 7 hours or more
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Number of recurring users of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Number of unique users of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Mean number of users per school district of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Percentage of school districts/schools using iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Percentage of iCHAMPSS 2.0 tools used in each step as assessed by the website analytics
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Perceived barriers to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the coordinator interviews and district coordinator surveys
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
This will be reported as a percentage
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Perceived facilitators to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the coordinator interviews and district coordinator surveys
Zeitfenster: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
This will be reported as a percentage
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Mitarbeiter

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Belinda Hernandez, PhD, MPH, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

2. April 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. April 2028

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. April 2028

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

9. April 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

29. Juni 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

1. Juli 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

1. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

29. Juni 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. April 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • HSC-SPH-24-0672
  • R01HD111699 (US NIH Stipendium/Vertrag)

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren