Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Disseminating Effective Sexual Health Programs in Schools Using iCHAMPSS

29. juni 2026 opdateret af: Belinda Hernandez, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of iCHAMPSS 2.0 in impacting Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) implementation outcomes, with implementation of a sexual health evidence-based program (EBP) assess iCHAMPSS 2.0's efficacy in impacting determinants of sexual health EBP implementation and to conduct a process evaluation to monitor iCHAMPSS 2.0 implementation, reach, dosage, and barriers and facilitators to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 during the study.

Studieoversigt

Status

Rekruttering

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Anslået)

75

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiekontakt

Undersøgelse Kontakt Backup

Studiesteder

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Barn
  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Licensed educator or administrator who holds one of the following positions: 1) district or school administrator (e.g., health coordinators, instructional specialists, and curriculum coordinators), 2) health and physical education teachers, and 3) social and health service staff (e.g., nurses and counselors) in a Texas school district participating in the iCHAMPSS 2.0 study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not holding a job in a Texas school district as a school stakeholder, OR holding a job in a Texas school district as a school stakeholder but not in a school district participating in the iCHAMPSS 2.0 study

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Forebyggelse
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Crossover opgave
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Arm 1: 1 semester of implementation then 7 semesters of intervention
Adfærdsmæssigt: iCHAMPSS 2.0

iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education.

iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:

  1. the CHAMPSS Model tutorial, which familiarizes Champions with the iCHAMPSS 2.0 system
  2. a Staging Tool, which helps Champions understand their school's level of readiness to adopt, implement, and maintain a sexual health EBP, and can tailor their experience
  3. a tools library, which includes a suite of over 60 decision support tools
  4. an interactive linkage system, which is an online platform to help Champions connect with others and to receive technical assistance (TA)
Eksperimentel: Arm 2: 1 semester of control, 1 semester of implementation then 7 semesters of intervention
Adfærdsmæssigt: iCHAMPSS 2.0

iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education.

iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:

  1. the CHAMPSS Model tutorial, which familiarizes Champions with the iCHAMPSS 2.0 system
  2. a Staging Tool, which helps Champions understand their school's level of readiness to adopt, implement, and maintain a sexual health EBP, and can tailor their experience
  3. a tools library, which includes a suite of over 60 decision support tools
  4. an interactive linkage system, which is an online platform to help Champions connect with others and to receive technical assistance (TA)
Eksperimentel: Arm 3: 1 semesters of control, 1 semester of implementation then 6 semesters of intervention
Adfærdsmæssigt: iCHAMPSS 2.0

iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education.

iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:

  1. the CHAMPSS Model tutorial, which familiarizes Champions with the iCHAMPSS 2.0 system
  2. a Staging Tool, which helps Champions understand their school's level of readiness to adopt, implement, and maintain a sexual health EBP, and can tailor their experience
  3. a tools library, which includes a suite of over 60 decision support tools
  4. an interactive linkage system, which is an online platform to help Champions connect with others and to receive technical assistance (TA)

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tidsramme
Change in percentage of schools within a district implementing an EBP
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Rate of implementation of the EBP
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Percentage of School Health Advisory Councils (SHACs) that have recommended a sexual health EBP to their school board
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of School Health Advisory Councils (SHACs) that have adopted a sexual health EBP to their school board
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of schools with the school board's approval of an Evidence Based Program (EBP)
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of schools with the principal's approval of an EBP
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of students receiving majority (over 50%) of a sexual health EBP
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of schools that have implemented the evidence-based program for more than one academic year as assessed by the implementation survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in perceived complexity as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 3 item questionnaire and each is scored form (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score of 15, higher score indicating worse outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in compatibility as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 5 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree maximum score 25, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in relative advantage as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score of 20, higher score indicating better better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in perceived social systems support in parent community as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 8 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) not at all supportive to (4) very supportive , maximum score of 32 , higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in presence of school policy as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 2 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 10, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in adequate resources as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 5 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score of 25, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in presence of a program champion as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in implementation climate as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 6 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score of 30, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in inter organizational relationships as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in intra organizational relationships as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in perceived need as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score range of 20, higher score indicating worse outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in self-efficacy as assessed by the staff survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 19 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(not at all confident)-4(very confident) , maximum score range of 76, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Frequency of use of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Time spent using iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the district coordinator survey
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
This will be reported categorically as less than one hour, 1-2 hours, 3-4 hours, 5-6 hours and 7 hours or more
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Number of recurring users of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Number of unique users of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Mean number of users per school district of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Percentage of school districts/schools using iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Percentage of iCHAMPSS 2.0 tools used in each step as assessed by the website analytics
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Perceived barriers to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the coordinator interviews and district coordinator surveys
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
This will be reported as a percentage
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Perceived facilitators to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the coordinator interviews and district coordinator surveys
Tidsramme: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
This will be reported as a percentage
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Samarbejdspartnere

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Belinda Hernandez, PhD, MPH, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

2. april 2026

Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)

1. april 2028

Studieafslutning (Anslået)

1. april 2028

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

9. april 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

29. juni 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

1. juli 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

1. juli 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

29. juni 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. april 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Nøgleord

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • HSC-SPH-24-0672
  • R01HD111699 (U.S. NIH-bevilling/kontrakt)

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Seksuel Sundhedsuddannelse

Kliniske forsøg med iCHAMPSS 2.0

Søg i lignende forsøg

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

CROs by country

CROs in Australia

Betingelser

Sjældne sygdomme

Narkotikainterventioner

Kosttilskud

Sponsor / samarbejdspartnere

Placeringer

Abonner