Disseminating Effective Sexual Health Programs in Schools Using iCHAMPSS
29 de junho de 2026 atualizado por: Belinda Hernandez, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of iCHAMPSS 2.0 in impacting Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) implementation outcomes, with implementation of a sexual health evidence-based program (EBP) assess iCHAMPSS 2.0's efficacy in impacting determinants of sexual health EBP implementation and to conduct a process evaluation to monitor iCHAMPSS 2.0 implementation, reach, dosage, and barriers and facilitators to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 during the study.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Recrutamento
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Inscrição (Estimado)
75
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Contato de estudo
- Nome: Belinda Hernandez, PhD, MPH
- Número de telefone: (210) 276-9009
- E-mail: Belinda.Hernandez@uth.tmc.edu
Estude backup de contato
- Nome: Laura Thormaehlen
- Número de telefone: (713) 500-9000
- E-mail: Laura.C.Thormaehlen@uth.tmc.edu
Locais de estudo
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, Estados Unidos, 77030
- Recrutamento
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
-
Contato:
- Belinda Hernandez, PhD, MPH
- Número de telefone: (210) 276-9009
- E-mail: Belinda.Hernandez@uth.tmc.edu
-
Contato:
- Laura Thormaehlen
- Número de telefone: (713) 500-9000
- E-mail: Laura.C.Thormaehlen@uth.tmc.edu
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Filho
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Sim
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Licensed educator or administrator who holds one of the following positions: 1) district or school administrator (e.g., health coordinators, instructional specialists, and curriculum coordinators), 2) health and physical education teachers, and 3) social and health service staff (e.g., nurses and counselors) in a Texas school district participating in the iCHAMPSS 2.0 study
Exclusion Criteria:
- not holding a job in a Texas school district as a school stakeholder, OR holding a job in a Texas school district as a school stakeholder but not in a school district participating in the iCHAMPSS 2.0 study
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Prevenção
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição cruzada
- Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Arm 1: 1 semester of implementation then 7 semesters of intervention
|
iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education. iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:
|
|
Experimental: Arm 2: 1 semester of control, 1 semester of implementation then 7 semesters of intervention
|
iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education. iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:
|
|
Experimental: Arm 3: 1 semesters of control, 1 semester of implementation then 6 semesters of intervention
|
iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education. iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Prazo |
|---|---|
|
Change in percentage of schools within a district implementing an EBP
Prazo: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Rate of implementation of the EBP
Prazo: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of School Health Advisory Councils (SHACs) that have recommended a sexual health EBP to their school board
Prazo: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Percentage of School Health Advisory Councils (SHACs) that have adopted a sexual health EBP to their school board
Prazo: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Percentage of schools with the school board's approval of an Evidence Based Program (EBP)
Prazo: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Percentage of schools with the principal's approval of an EBP
Prazo: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Percentage of students receiving majority (over 50%) of a sexual health EBP
Prazo: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Percentage of schools that have implemented the evidence-based program for more than one academic year as assessed by the implementation survey
Prazo: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Change in perceived complexity as assessed by the staff survey
Prazo: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 3 item questionnaire and each is scored form (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score of 15, higher score indicating worse outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in compatibility as assessed by the staff survey
Prazo: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 5 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree maximum score 25, higher score indicating better outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in relative advantage as assessed by the staff survey
Prazo: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score of 20, higher score indicating better better outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in perceived social systems support in parent community as assessed by the staff survey
Prazo: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 8 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) not at all supportive to (4) very supportive , maximum score of 32 , higher score indicating better outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in presence of school policy as assessed by the staff survey
Prazo: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 2 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 10, higher score indicating better outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in adequate resources as assessed by the staff survey
Prazo: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 5 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score of 25, higher score indicating better outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in presence of a program champion as assessed by the staff survey
Prazo: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in implementation climate as assessed by the staff survey
Prazo: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 6 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score of 30, higher score indicating better outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in inter organizational relationships as assessed by the staff survey
Prazo: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in intra organizational relationships as assessed by the staff survey
Prazo: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in perceived need as assessed by the staff survey
Prazo: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score range of 20, higher score indicating worse outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Change in self-efficacy as assessed by the staff survey
Prazo: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
This is a 19 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(not at all confident)-4(very confident) , maximum score range of 76, higher score indicating better outcome
|
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
|
|
Frequency of use of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Prazo: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Time spent using iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the district coordinator survey
Prazo: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
This will be reported categorically as less than one hour, 1-2 hours, 3-4 hours, 5-6 hours and 7 hours or more
|
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
|
Number of recurring users of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Prazo: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Number of unique users of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Prazo: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Mean number of users per school district of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Prazo: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Percentage of school districts/schools using iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Prazo: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Percentage of iCHAMPSS 2.0 tools used in each step as assessed by the website analytics
Prazo: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
|
|
Perceived barriers to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the coordinator interviews and district coordinator surveys
Prazo: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
This will be reported as a percentage
|
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
|
Perceived facilitators to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the coordinator interviews and district coordinator surveys
Prazo: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
This will be reported as a percentage
|
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Colaboradores
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Belinda Hernandez, PhD, MPH, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
2 de abril de 2026
Conclusão Primária (Estimado)
1 de abril de 2028
Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)
1 de abril de 2028
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
9 de abril de 2026
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
29 de junho de 2026
Primeira postagem (Real)
1 de julho de 2026
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
1 de julho de 2026
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
29 de junho de 2026
Última verificação
1 de abril de 2026
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- HSC-SPH-24-0672
- R01HD111699 (Concessão/Contrato do NIH dos EUA)
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
NÃO
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .