Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Disseminating Effective Sexual Health Programs in Schools Using iCHAMPSS

29 juin 2026 mis à jour par: Belinda Hernandez, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of iCHAMPSS 2.0 in impacting Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) implementation outcomes, with implementation of a sexual health evidence-based program (EBP) assess iCHAMPSS 2.0's efficacy in impacting determinants of sexual health EBP implementation and to conduct a process evaluation to monitor iCHAMPSS 2.0 implementation, reach, dosage, and barriers and facilitators to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 during the study.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Recrutement

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

75

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Enfant
  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Licensed educator or administrator who holds one of the following positions: 1) district or school administrator (e.g., health coordinators, instructional specialists, and curriculum coordinators), 2) health and physical education teachers, and 3) social and health service staff (e.g., nurses and counselors) in a Texas school district participating in the iCHAMPSS 2.0 study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not holding a job in a Texas school district as a school stakeholder, OR holding a job in a Texas school district as a school stakeholder but not in a school district participating in the iCHAMPSS 2.0 study

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: La prévention
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation croisée
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Arm 1: 1 semester of implementation then 7 semesters of intervention
Comportemental: iCHAMPSS 2.0

iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education.

iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:

  1. the CHAMPSS Model tutorial, which familiarizes Champions with the iCHAMPSS 2.0 system
  2. a Staging Tool, which helps Champions understand their school's level of readiness to adopt, implement, and maintain a sexual health EBP, and can tailor their experience
  3. a tools library, which includes a suite of over 60 decision support tools
  4. an interactive linkage system, which is an online platform to help Champions connect with others and to receive technical assistance (TA)
Expérimental: Arm 2: 1 semester of control, 1 semester of implementation then 7 semesters of intervention
Comportemental: iCHAMPSS 2.0

iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education.

iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:

  1. the CHAMPSS Model tutorial, which familiarizes Champions with the iCHAMPSS 2.0 system
  2. a Staging Tool, which helps Champions understand their school's level of readiness to adopt, implement, and maintain a sexual health EBP, and can tailor their experience
  3. a tools library, which includes a suite of over 60 decision support tools
  4. an interactive linkage system, which is an online platform to help Champions connect with others and to receive technical assistance (TA)
Expérimental: Arm 3: 1 semesters of control, 1 semester of implementation then 6 semesters of intervention
Comportemental: iCHAMPSS 2.0

iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education.

iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:

  1. the CHAMPSS Model tutorial, which familiarizes Champions with the iCHAMPSS 2.0 system
  2. a Staging Tool, which helps Champions understand their school's level of readiness to adopt, implement, and maintain a sexual health EBP, and can tailor their experience
  3. a tools library, which includes a suite of over 60 decision support tools
  4. an interactive linkage system, which is an online platform to help Champions connect with others and to receive technical assistance (TA)

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Délai
Change in percentage of schools within a district implementing an EBP
Délai: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Rate of implementation of the EBP
Délai: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Percentage of School Health Advisory Councils (SHACs) that have recommended a sexual health EBP to their school board
Délai: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of School Health Advisory Councils (SHACs) that have adopted a sexual health EBP to their school board
Délai: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of schools with the school board's approval of an Evidence Based Program (EBP)
Délai: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of schools with the principal's approval of an EBP
Délai: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of students receiving majority (over 50%) of a sexual health EBP
Délai: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Percentage of schools that have implemented the evidence-based program for more than one academic year as assessed by the implementation survey
Délai: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in perceived complexity as assessed by the staff survey
Délai: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 3 item questionnaire and each is scored form (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score of 15, higher score indicating worse outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in compatibility as assessed by the staff survey
Délai: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 5 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree maximum score 25, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in relative advantage as assessed by the staff survey
Délai: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score of 20, higher score indicating better better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in perceived social systems support in parent community as assessed by the staff survey
Délai: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 8 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) not at all supportive to (4) very supportive , maximum score of 32 , higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in presence of school policy as assessed by the staff survey
Délai: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 2 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 10, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in adequate resources as assessed by the staff survey
Délai: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 5 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score of 25, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in presence of a program champion as assessed by the staff survey
Délai: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in implementation climate as assessed by the staff survey
Délai: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 6 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score of 30, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in inter organizational relationships as assessed by the staff survey
Délai: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in intra organizational relationships as assessed by the staff survey
Délai: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in perceived need as assessed by the staff survey
Délai: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score range of 20, higher score indicating worse outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Change in self-efficacy as assessed by the staff survey
Délai: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
This is a 19 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(not at all confident)-4(very confident) , maximum score range of 76, higher score indicating better outcome
From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)
Frequency of use of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Délai: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Time spent using iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the district coordinator survey
Délai: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
This will be reported categorically as less than one hour, 1-2 hours, 3-4 hours, 5-6 hours and 7 hours or more
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Number of recurring users of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Délai: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Number of unique users of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Délai: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Mean number of users per school district of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Délai: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Percentage of school districts/schools using iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics
Délai: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Percentage of iCHAMPSS 2.0 tools used in each step as assessed by the website analytics
Délai: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Perceived barriers to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the coordinator interviews and district coordinator surveys
Délai: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
This will be reported as a percentage
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
Perceived facilitators to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the coordinator interviews and district coordinator surveys
Délai: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)
This will be reported as a percentage
From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Collaborateurs

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Belinda Hernandez, PhD, MPH, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

2 avril 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 avril 2028

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 avril 2028

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

9 avril 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

29 juin 2026

Première publication (Réel)

1 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

1 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

29 juin 2026

Dernière vérification

1 avril 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Mots clés

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • HSC-SPH-24-0672
  • R01HD111699 (Subvention/contrat des NIH des États-Unis)

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner