Artificial Intelligence Identifying Polyps in Real-world Colonoscopy
14. desember 2018 oppdatert av: Zhaoshen Li
Validating the Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Identifying Polyps in Real-world Colonoscopy
Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) assisted image recognition has made remarkable breakthroughs in various medical fields with the developing of deep learning and conventional neural networks (CNNs).
However, all current AI assisted-diagnosis systems (ADSs) were established and validated on endoscopic images or selected videos, while its actual assisted-diagnosis performance in real-world colonoscopy is up to now unknown.
Therefore, we validated the performance of an ADS in real-world colonoscopy, which is based on deep learning algorithm and CNNs, trained and tested in multicenter datasets of 20 endoscopy centers.
Studieoversikt
Status
Fullført
Forhold
Intervensjon / Behandling
Detaljert beskrivelse
The ADS were established in changhai digestive endoscopy center to assess its efficacy in clinical practice.
The ADS automatically initiated once the ileocecal valve was pictured by the colonoscopist or the colonoscopist recorded any image of colon during the insertion.
When colonoscopists withdrew the colonoscopies and inspect the colons, the video streaming of colonoscopies was real-time switched to the ADS, which made it feasible to identify and classify lesions in real time.
Colonoscopists were invited to respond if they doubted potential polyps in the screen, and the ADS also made a voice when identifying potential polyps, followed by repeatedly inspecting to confirm the existence of lesions.
The voice of ADS could be real-time heard by colonoscopists, while the screen of ADS was placed right behind colonoscopists, where polyps identified by ADS could be seen after the colonoscopists' turning but not simultaneously.
The lesion detection by ADS or colonoscopists were determined as follow: A. polyps only identified by ADS, which was considered to be missed by colonoscopists: polyps were reported by the ADS and the colonoscopists did not know the location of polyps without reminder of the ADS until the polyps disappeared from the view; B. polyps first identified by ADS: polyps were first reported by the ADS and the colonoscopists also later knew the location of polyps by themselves; C. polyps simultaneously identified by the ADS and colonoscopists: the time of reporting polyps was closely synchronal (within 1 second); D. polyps first reported by colonoscopists: polyps were first reported by the colonoscopists and the ADS also later identified the location of polyps before the colonoscopists unfolded and pictured the polyps; E. polyps only reported by colonoscopists, which was considered to be missed by the ADS: polyps were reported by the colonoscopists and the ADS did not identify the location of polyps until colonoscopists unfolded and pictured the polyps.
Besides, the false-positives of real-world ADS were also reported with potential causes analyzed by colonoscopists.
Studietype
Observasjonsmessig
Registrering (Faktiske)
209
Kontakter og plasseringer
Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.
Studiesteder
-
-
-
Shanghai, Kina, 200433
- Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University
-
Shanghai, Kina, 200433
- Changhai hospital
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
18 år til 75 år (Voksen, Eldre voksen)
Tar imot friske frivillige
Nei
Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier
Alle
Prøvetakingsmetode
Ikke-sannsynlighetsprøve
Studiepopulasjon
consecutive outpatient who recieved colonoscopy
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients receiving screening colonoscopy
- patients receiving surveillance colonoscopy
- patients receiving diagnostic colonoscopy
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients with declined consent
- patients with poor bowel preparation
- patients with failed cecal intubation
- patients with colonic resection
- patients with inflammatory bowel diseases
- patients with polyposis
Studieplan
Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Observasjonsmodeller: Bare etui
- Tidsperspektiver: Potensielle
Kohorter og intervensjoner
Gruppe / Kohort |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
colonoscopy withdrawal with the ADS monitoring
The ADS automatically initiated once the ileocecal valve was pictured by the colonoscopist or the colonoscopist recorded any image of colon during the insertion.
When colonoscopists withdrew the colonoscopies and inspect the colons, the video streaming of colonoscopies was real-time switched to the ADS, which made it feasible to identify and classify lesions in real time.
|
During the testing of trained ADS, when the system doubts colonic lesions from the input data of the test images, a rectangular frame was displayed in the endoscopic image to surround the lesion.
If the system confirmed it as the colonic lesions, a sound of reminder will be played and the types of lesions (non-adenomatous polyps, adenomatous polyps and colorectal cancers) will be classified by the system.
We adopted several standards to define the identification and classification of colonic lesions: 1) when the system identified and confirmed any lesion in the images of no polyps or cancers, the results were judged to be false-positive.
2) when the system both confirmed and correctly localized the lesions in images (IoU > 0.3), the results were judged to be true-positive.
3) when the system did not confirm or correctly localize the lesions, the results were judged as false-negative.
4) when system confirmed no lesions in the normal images, the results were judged to be true-negative.
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
sensitivity of the ADS in identifying polyps
Tidsramme: 1 hour
|
Polyps that were only reported by colonoscopists were considered to be missed by the ADS (polyps were reported by the colonoscopists and the ADS did not identify the location of polyps until colonoscopists unfolded and pictured the polyps.)
|
1 hour
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
false positves of the ADS per colonoscopy withdrawal
Tidsramme: 1 hour
|
when the system identified and confirmed any lesion in the images with no polyps or cancers appearing, the results were judged to be false-positive.
|
1 hour
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.
Sponsor
Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker
Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.
Generelle publikasjoner
- Byrne MF, Chapados N, Soudan F, Oertel C, Linares Perez M, Kelly R, Iqbal N, Chandelier F, Rex DK. Real-time differentiation of adenomatous and hyperplastic diminutive colorectal polyps during analysis of unaltered videos of standard colonoscopy using a deep learning model. Gut. 2019 Jan;68(1):94-100. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314547. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
- Wang Z, Meng Q, Wang S, Li Z, Bai Y, Wang D. Deep learning-based endoscopic image recognition for detection of early gastric cancer: a Chinese perspective. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jul;88(1):198-199. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.029. No abstract available.
- Urban G, Tripathi P, Alkayali T, Mittal M, Jalali F, Karnes W, Baldi P. Deep Learning Localizes and Identifies Polyps in Real Time With 96% Accuracy in Screening Colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2018 Oct;155(4):1069-1078.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.037. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
- Wang Z, Zhao S, Bai Y. Artificial Intelligence as a Third Eye in Lesion Detection by Endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Sep;16(9):1537. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.032. No abstract available.
Studierekorddatoer
Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
1. november 2018
Primær fullføring (Faktiske)
10. desember 2018
Studiet fullført (Faktiske)
10. desember 2018
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
30. november 2018
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
30. november 2018
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
3. desember 2018
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
17. desember 2018
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
14. desember 2018
Sist bekreftet
1. desember 2018
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre studie-ID-numre
- AI-1
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Nei
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Nei
produkt produsert i og eksportert fra USA
Nei
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .