Artificial Intelligence Identifying Polyps in Real-world Colonoscopy
14 de diciembre de 2018 actualizado por: Zhaoshen Li
Validating the Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Identifying Polyps in Real-world Colonoscopy
Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) assisted image recognition has made remarkable breakthroughs in various medical fields with the developing of deep learning and conventional neural networks (CNNs).
However, all current AI assisted-diagnosis systems (ADSs) were established and validated on endoscopic images or selected videos, while its actual assisted-diagnosis performance in real-world colonoscopy is up to now unknown.
Therefore, we validated the performance of an ADS in real-world colonoscopy, which is based on deep learning algorithm and CNNs, trained and tested in multicenter datasets of 20 endoscopy centers.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Terminado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
The ADS were established in changhai digestive endoscopy center to assess its efficacy in clinical practice.
The ADS automatically initiated once the ileocecal valve was pictured by the colonoscopist or the colonoscopist recorded any image of colon during the insertion.
When colonoscopists withdrew the colonoscopies and inspect the colons, the video streaming of colonoscopies was real-time switched to the ADS, which made it feasible to identify and classify lesions in real time.
Colonoscopists were invited to respond if they doubted potential polyps in the screen, and the ADS also made a voice when identifying potential polyps, followed by repeatedly inspecting to confirm the existence of lesions.
The voice of ADS could be real-time heard by colonoscopists, while the screen of ADS was placed right behind colonoscopists, where polyps identified by ADS could be seen after the colonoscopists' turning but not simultaneously.
The lesion detection by ADS or colonoscopists were determined as follow: A. polyps only identified by ADS, which was considered to be missed by colonoscopists: polyps were reported by the ADS and the colonoscopists did not know the location of polyps without reminder of the ADS until the polyps disappeared from the view; B. polyps first identified by ADS: polyps were first reported by the ADS and the colonoscopists also later knew the location of polyps by themselves; C. polyps simultaneously identified by the ADS and colonoscopists: the time of reporting polyps was closely synchronal (within 1 second); D. polyps first reported by colonoscopists: polyps were first reported by the colonoscopists and the ADS also later identified the location of polyps before the colonoscopists unfolded and pictured the polyps; E. polyps only reported by colonoscopists, which was considered to be missed by the ADS: polyps were reported by the colonoscopists and the ADS did not identify the location of polyps until colonoscopists unfolded and pictured the polyps.
Besides, the false-positives of real-world ADS were also reported with potential causes analyzed by colonoscopists.
Tipo de estudio
De observación
Inscripción (Actual)
209
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
-
Shanghai, Porcelana, 200433
- Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University
-
Shanghai, Porcelana, 200433
- Changhai Hospital
-
-
Criterios de participación
Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
18 años a 75 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
No
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Todos
Método de muestreo
Muestra no probabilística
Población de estudio
consecutive outpatient who recieved colonoscopy
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients receiving screening colonoscopy
- patients receiving surveillance colonoscopy
- patients receiving diagnostic colonoscopy
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients with declined consent
- patients with poor bowel preparation
- patients with failed cecal intubation
- patients with colonic resection
- patients with inflammatory bowel diseases
- patients with polyposis
Plan de estudios
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Modelos observacionales: Solo caso
- Perspectivas temporales: Futuro
Cohortes e Intervenciones
Grupo / Cohorte |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
colonoscopy withdrawal with the ADS monitoring
The ADS automatically initiated once the ileocecal valve was pictured by the colonoscopist or the colonoscopist recorded any image of colon during the insertion.
When colonoscopists withdrew the colonoscopies and inspect the colons, the video streaming of colonoscopies was real-time switched to the ADS, which made it feasible to identify and classify lesions in real time.
|
During the testing of trained ADS, when the system doubts colonic lesions from the input data of the test images, a rectangular frame was displayed in the endoscopic image to surround the lesion.
If the system confirmed it as the colonic lesions, a sound of reminder will be played and the types of lesions (non-adenomatous polyps, adenomatous polyps and colorectal cancers) will be classified by the system.
We adopted several standards to define the identification and classification of colonic lesions: 1) when the system identified and confirmed any lesion in the images of no polyps or cancers, the results were judged to be false-positive.
2) when the system both confirmed and correctly localized the lesions in images (IoU > 0.3), the results were judged to be true-positive.
3) when the system did not confirm or correctly localize the lesions, the results were judged as false-negative.
4) when system confirmed no lesions in the normal images, the results were judged to be true-negative.
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
sensitivity of the ADS in identifying polyps
Periodo de tiempo: 1 hour
|
Polyps that were only reported by colonoscopists were considered to be missed by the ADS (polyps were reported by the colonoscopists and the ADS did not identify the location of polyps until colonoscopists unfolded and pictured the polyps.)
|
1 hour
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
false positves of the ADS per colonoscopy withdrawal
Periodo de tiempo: 1 hour
|
when the system identified and confirmed any lesion in the images with no polyps or cancers appearing, the results were judged to be false-positive.
|
1 hour
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.
Patrocinador
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.
Publicaciones Generales
- Byrne MF, Chapados N, Soudan F, Oertel C, Linares Perez M, Kelly R, Iqbal N, Chandelier F, Rex DK. Real-time differentiation of adenomatous and hyperplastic diminutive colorectal polyps during analysis of unaltered videos of standard colonoscopy using a deep learning model. Gut. 2019 Jan;68(1):94-100. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314547. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
- Wang Z, Meng Q, Wang S, Li Z, Bai Y, Wang D. Deep learning-based endoscopic image recognition for detection of early gastric cancer: a Chinese perspective. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jul;88(1):198-199. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.029. No abstract available.
- Urban G, Tripathi P, Alkayali T, Mittal M, Jalali F, Karnes W, Baldi P. Deep Learning Localizes and Identifies Polyps in Real Time With 96% Accuracy in Screening Colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2018 Oct;155(4):1069-1078.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.037. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
- Wang Z, Zhao S, Bai Y. Artificial Intelligence as a Third Eye in Lesion Detection by Endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Sep;16(9):1537. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.032. No abstract available.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
1 de noviembre de 2018
Finalización primaria (Actual)
10 de diciembre de 2018
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
10 de diciembre de 2018
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
30 de noviembre de 2018
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
30 de noviembre de 2018
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
3 de diciembre de 2018
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
17 de diciembre de 2018
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
14 de diciembre de 2018
Última verificación
1 de diciembre de 2018
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- AI-1
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.
No
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .