Artificial Intelligence Identifying Polyps in Real-world Colonoscopy
14 de dezembro de 2018 atualizado por: Zhaoshen Li
Validating the Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Identifying Polyps in Real-world Colonoscopy
Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) assisted image recognition has made remarkable breakthroughs in various medical fields with the developing of deep learning and conventional neural networks (CNNs).
However, all current AI assisted-diagnosis systems (ADSs) were established and validated on endoscopic images or selected videos, while its actual assisted-diagnosis performance in real-world colonoscopy is up to now unknown.
Therefore, we validated the performance of an ADS in real-world colonoscopy, which is based on deep learning algorithm and CNNs, trained and tested in multicenter datasets of 20 endoscopy centers.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Concluído
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
The ADS were established in changhai digestive endoscopy center to assess its efficacy in clinical practice.
The ADS automatically initiated once the ileocecal valve was pictured by the colonoscopist or the colonoscopist recorded any image of colon during the insertion.
When colonoscopists withdrew the colonoscopies and inspect the colons, the video streaming of colonoscopies was real-time switched to the ADS, which made it feasible to identify and classify lesions in real time.
Colonoscopists were invited to respond if they doubted potential polyps in the screen, and the ADS also made a voice when identifying potential polyps, followed by repeatedly inspecting to confirm the existence of lesions.
The voice of ADS could be real-time heard by colonoscopists, while the screen of ADS was placed right behind colonoscopists, where polyps identified by ADS could be seen after the colonoscopists' turning but not simultaneously.
The lesion detection by ADS or colonoscopists were determined as follow: A. polyps only identified by ADS, which was considered to be missed by colonoscopists: polyps were reported by the ADS and the colonoscopists did not know the location of polyps without reminder of the ADS until the polyps disappeared from the view; B. polyps first identified by ADS: polyps were first reported by the ADS and the colonoscopists also later knew the location of polyps by themselves; C. polyps simultaneously identified by the ADS and colonoscopists: the time of reporting polyps was closely synchronal (within 1 second); D. polyps first reported by colonoscopists: polyps were first reported by the colonoscopists and the ADS also later identified the location of polyps before the colonoscopists unfolded and pictured the polyps; E. polyps only reported by colonoscopists, which was considered to be missed by the ADS: polyps were reported by the colonoscopists and the ADS did not identify the location of polyps until colonoscopists unfolded and pictured the polyps.
Besides, the false-positives of real-world ADS were also reported with potential causes analyzed by colonoscopists.
Tipo de estudo
Observacional
Inscrição (Real)
209
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Locais de estudo
-
-
-
Shanghai, China, 200433
- Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University
-
Shanghai, China, 200433
- Changhai Hospital
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
18 anos a 75 anos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Não
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Tudo
Método de amostragem
Amostra Não Probabilística
População do estudo
consecutive outpatient who recieved colonoscopy
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients receiving screening colonoscopy
- patients receiving surveillance colonoscopy
- patients receiving diagnostic colonoscopy
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients with declined consent
- patients with poor bowel preparation
- patients with failed cecal intubation
- patients with colonic resection
- patients with inflammatory bowel diseases
- patients with polyposis
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Modelos de observação: Caso-somente
- Perspectivas de Tempo: Prospectivo
Coortes e Intervenções
Grupo / Coorte |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
colonoscopy withdrawal with the ADS monitoring
The ADS automatically initiated once the ileocecal valve was pictured by the colonoscopist or the colonoscopist recorded any image of colon during the insertion.
When colonoscopists withdrew the colonoscopies and inspect the colons, the video streaming of colonoscopies was real-time switched to the ADS, which made it feasible to identify and classify lesions in real time.
|
During the testing of trained ADS, when the system doubts colonic lesions from the input data of the test images, a rectangular frame was displayed in the endoscopic image to surround the lesion.
If the system confirmed it as the colonic lesions, a sound of reminder will be played and the types of lesions (non-adenomatous polyps, adenomatous polyps and colorectal cancers) will be classified by the system.
We adopted several standards to define the identification and classification of colonic lesions: 1) when the system identified and confirmed any lesion in the images of no polyps or cancers, the results were judged to be false-positive.
2) when the system both confirmed and correctly localized the lesions in images (IoU > 0.3), the results were judged to be true-positive.
3) when the system did not confirm or correctly localize the lesions, the results were judged as false-negative.
4) when system confirmed no lesions in the normal images, the results were judged to be true-negative.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
sensitivity of the ADS in identifying polyps
Prazo: 1 hour
|
Polyps that were only reported by colonoscopists were considered to be missed by the ADS (polyps were reported by the colonoscopists and the ADS did not identify the location of polyps until colonoscopists unfolded and pictured the polyps.)
|
1 hour
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
false positves of the ADS per colonoscopy withdrawal
Prazo: 1 hour
|
when the system identified and confirmed any lesion in the images with no polyps or cancers appearing, the results were judged to be false-positive.
|
1 hour
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Patrocinador
Publicações e links úteis
A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.
Publicações Gerais
- Byrne MF, Chapados N, Soudan F, Oertel C, Linares Perez M, Kelly R, Iqbal N, Chandelier F, Rex DK. Real-time differentiation of adenomatous and hyperplastic diminutive colorectal polyps during analysis of unaltered videos of standard colonoscopy using a deep learning model. Gut. 2019 Jan;68(1):94-100. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314547. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
- Wang Z, Meng Q, Wang S, Li Z, Bai Y, Wang D. Deep learning-based endoscopic image recognition for detection of early gastric cancer: a Chinese perspective. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jul;88(1):198-199. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.029. No abstract available.
- Urban G, Tripathi P, Alkayali T, Mittal M, Jalali F, Karnes W, Baldi P. Deep Learning Localizes and Identifies Polyps in Real Time With 96% Accuracy in Screening Colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2018 Oct;155(4):1069-1078.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.037. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
- Wang Z, Zhao S, Bai Y. Artificial Intelligence as a Third Eye in Lesion Detection by Endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Sep;16(9):1537. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.032. No abstract available.
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
1 de novembro de 2018
Conclusão Primária (Real)
10 de dezembro de 2018
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
10 de dezembro de 2018
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
30 de novembro de 2018
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
30 de novembro de 2018
Primeira postagem (Real)
3 de dezembro de 2018
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
17 de dezembro de 2018
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
14 de dezembro de 2018
Última verificação
1 de dezembro de 2018
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- AI-1
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
produto fabricado e exportado dos EUA
Não
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .