Evaluation on Standardized Circuits of the Interest of a Robotic Module of Assistance to the Driving 1 (SWADAPT1)
Evaluering av standardiserte kretsløp av interesse for en robotmodul for hjelp til kjøring av pasienter med nevrologiske lidelser, vanlige førere av elektriske rullestoler.
The device that is the subject of this investigation is a robotic assistance module for driving a semi-autonomous electric wheelchair. This module is designed to accessorize the electric wheelchair to improve the safety conditions when driving an electric wheelchair, thus reducing the wheelchair accident rate on the one hand and facilitating access to the wheelchair to persons who can not claim it without the use of a safety device of this type.
Studieoversikt
Status
Forhold
Detaljert beskrivelse
The device that is the subject of this investigation is a robotic assistance module for driving a semi-autonomous electric wheelchair. This module is designed to accessorize the electric wheelchair to improve the safety conditions when driving an electric wheelchair, thus reducing the wheelchair accident rate on the one hand and facilitating access to the wheelchair to persons who can not claim it without the use of a safety device of this type.
Each patient included will test a wheelchair equipped with a collision avoidance assistance module in 2 conditions, assistance activated or not. This evaluation will be carried out in 3 standardized test circuits of increasing difficulty, one week apart. At each session, the patient will perform the circuit 6 times, including 3 with activated assistance, in a random order established upstream.
Studietype
Registrering (Faktiske)
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Kontakter og plasseringer
Studiesteder
-
-
Brittany Region
-
Rennes, Brittany Region, Frankrike, 35000
- Pôle Saint-Hélier
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
Tar imot friske frivillige
Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged over 18,
- Having freely consented to participate in the study,
- suffering from neurological disorders such as cerebro-lesion or neuro-degeneration,
- Having benefited from a prescription of electric wheelchair and circulating in an electric wheelchair for more than 3 months,
- of which the electric wheelchair is the main mode of transport,
- The physical measurements (weight, height) are compatible with the use of the electric wheelchair chosen for the development of the robotics assistance module.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Understanding difficulties preventing the realization of the protocol,
- Motor disorders of the upper limb requiring additional driving technical assistance,
- Patient having expressed difficulties impacting his safety of sedan and / or exterior.
Studieplan
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Annen
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Crossover-oppdrag
- Masking: Dobbelt
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentell: Electric wheelchair with activated assistance module
This condition will be achieved in 3 standardized test circuits of increasing difficulty, one week apart. At each session, the patient will perform the circuit 6 times, including 3 with activated assistance, in a random order established upstream. |
This evaluation will be carried out in 3 standardized test circuits of increasing difficulty, one week apart. At each session, the patient will perform the circuit 6 times, including 3 with activated assistance |
|
Annen: Electric wheelchair with assistance module not activated
This condition will be achieved in 3 standardized test circuits of increasing difficulty, one week apart. At each session, the patient will perform the circuit 6 times, including 3 without activated assistance, in a random order established upstream. |
This evaluation will be carried out in 3 standardized test circuits of increasing difficulty, one week apart. At each session, the patient will perform the circuit 6 times, including 3 with no activated assistance |
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of collision
Tidsramme: Day 1
|
The primary judgment criterion is the number of collisions on different standardized circuits with and without activation of the robotic assistance module. |
Day 1
|
|
Number of collision
Tidsramme: Day 8
|
The primary judgment criterion is the number of collisions on different standardized circuits with and without activation of the robotic assistance module. |
Day 8
|
|
Number of collision
Tidsramme: Day 15
|
The primary judgment criterion is the number of collisions on different standardized circuits with and without activation of the robotic assistance module. |
Day 15
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Driving Speed
Tidsramme: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
Speed measured by the completion time of the course with and without activation of the assistance system on the different circuits |
Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
|
Wheelchair Skill Test
Tidsramme: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
Driving performance measured by the Wheelchair Skill Test items corresponding to the different courses, with and without activation of the assistance system |
Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
|
NASA-Task Load Index
Tidsramme: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
The cognitive load of tests under both conditions will be measured by the NASA-Task Load Index. It is in the form of six scales where the participant must assign a score between zero and one hundred to each of them, score indicating a growing level of intensity. Three dimensions relate to the demands imposed on the subject (mental, physical and temporal demands) and three to the interaction of a subject with the task (effort, frustration and performance) |
Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
|
Ease of Use Questionnaire
Tidsramme: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
The satisfaction of the use of the electric wheelchair under the conditions will be evaluated by the self-questionnaire Ease of Use Questionnaire. It measures the subjective usability of a product or service. It is a 30-item survey that examines four dimensions of usability: usefulness, ease of use, ease of learning, and satisfaction. The questionnaires were constructed as seven-point Likert rating scales. Users were asked to rate agreement with the statements, ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (7). |
Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
|
UTAUT (Unified theory of acceptance of technology) questionnaire
Tidsramme: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
Questionnaire of acceptability / acceptance of the tool and its use by patients based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use Technology (UTAUT). |
Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Sponsor
Etterforskere
- Hovedetterforsker: Philippe Gallien, Doctor, Pôle Saint Hélier
Studierekorddatoer
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
Primær fullføring (Faktiske)
Studiet fullført (Faktiske)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Sist bekreftet
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre studie-ID-numre
- 2019-A00476-51
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .