Modified Sternal Precautions Versus Conventional Sternal Precautions in Physical Function After Sternotomy
31. mai 2022 oppdatert av: Riphah International University
Effectiveness of Modified Sternal Precautions Versus Conventional Sternal Precautions in Improving Physical Function After Sternotomy
This research study Effectiveness of modified sternal precautions versus conventional sternal precautions in improving physical function after sternotomy .After recruitment of the subjects, the intervention group will receive modified sternal precaution while the control group will receive conventional sternal precautions and they will be assess for their physical activity, kinesiophobia, quality of life and post sternotomy pain.
Studieoversikt
Status
Fullført
Forhold
Intervensjon / Behandling
Detaljert beskrivelse
This study will address the scarcity of research and the variations in recommendations regarding sternal precautions and restrictions of upper limb movement in cardiac patients and will help to evaluate the effect of modified sternal precautions on patients' pain and functional activity.
As physical therapists are the ones who have maximum exposure to practice and teaching of sternal precautions, therefore this study will help to formulate the guidelines regarding the use of upper limb during cardiac rehabilitation exercises and making standards for sternal precautions and its management following cardiac surgery.
Studietype
Intervensjonell
Registrering (Faktiske)
40
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Kontakter og plasseringer
Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.
Studiesteder
-
-
KPK
-
Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan, 25000
- Rehman Medical Institute
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
40 år til 65 år (Voksen, Eldre voksen)
Tar imot friske frivillige
Nei
Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier
Mann
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Open heart surgery patients (CABG and Valve surgeries)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unstable vitals
- Patient needing maximum assistance
- Decline consent
Studieplan
Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
- Masking: Ingen (Open Label)
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentell: Modified sternal precautions
Interventional group (Modified sternal precautions)
|
Use pain and discomfort to guide the safe use of the arms Avoid pushing or pulling with one arm Use both arms close to the body during lifting Use of arms is possible, but keep them close to the body Avoid stretching one or both arms backwards at the same time Use a cushion or perform sternal preservation technique (crossing the arms in a 'self-hugging 'posture) when coughing. When transferring, roll onto the side, ease the legs over the edge of the bed and carefully use the arms to sit up from a lying position |
|
Aktiv komparator: Conventional sternal precautions
Control group (Conventional sternal precautions)
|
Avoid pushing or pulling through the arms Avoid one-arm (unilateral) activity Limit the elevation of the arms to 90 degrees Avoid lifting objects heavier than 2 kg Use a cushion or perform sternal preservation technique (crossing the arms in a 'self-hugging' posture) when coughing Limit the use of the arms when transferring from sitting to standing and getting out of bed Avoid placing the arms behind the back
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Short physical performance battery
Tidsramme: 4 Week
|
SPBB is a commonly used tool in clinical setting for measuring the physical performance of patients.
It is known for its feasibility and shorter time to conduct.
It has been used in different studies for reporting outcome measure post cardiac surgery.
This outcome measure is also selected due to its high validity and reliability.
The reliability of the test is 0.87.
It is divided into three subtests: balance, a short walk at normal pace and lastly standing up from a chair five times repeatedly.
These subsets exemplify core tasks being important for independent living.
|
4 Week
|
|
Functional difficulties questionnaire
Tidsramme: 4 week
|
Functional difficulties questionnaire is a functional outcome measures that specially focuses on the thoracic region and upper limb movements in people following cardiac surgery.
The validity of the questionnaire is 0.971 while its reliability is 0.918.
The questionnaire is divided into 13 questions which consists of functional tasks, causing difficulty following cardiac surgery.
Participants are required to mark on an unmarked 10cm VAS the level of difficulty they experienced when completing each of the included tasks, based on the previous time they experience.
|
4 week
|
|
Tampa scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-II)
Tidsramme: 4 week
|
It is a broadly used tool to measure pain related fear beliefs regarding movement and re-injury.
The validly of the questionnaire range between 0.74 to 0.87 and its reliability is 0.747.
It is a self-reported questionnaire.
It includes 11 questions scale on likert scale ranging from 1 to 4 where 1 means strongly disagree while 4 means strongly agree.
The total score ranges between 11 to 44.
Higher score indicate high level of kinesiopobhia.
A reduction of points equal or more than 3 points accounting for about 10% is considered as relevant change.
|
4 week
|
|
Mcgill pain questionnaire - short form version 2 (SF-MPQ-2)
Tidsramme: 4 Week
|
It is one of the most widely used questionnaire for the measurement of pain.
Its benefit is that it provides valuable information on the sensory, affective and evaluative dimensions of pain experience by an individual.
It has a capability of discriminating among different types of pain problems.
It has become one of the most commonly used tests for the measurement of pain following cardiac surgery via sternotomy.
The reliability of the questionnaire ranges from 0.75 to 0.83.
|
4 Week
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Health survey (SF-36)
Tidsramme: 4 week
|
This questionnaire provides overall measure of quality of recovery of patient according to the patient's perspective.
It is a reliable and valid tool used mainly in clinical practices to measure health related quality of life following cardiac surgery.
The reliability of scale is 0.65 to 0.96.
This tool consists of eight domains comprising of physical functioning, role physical functioning, role emotional functioning, mental health, vitality, social functioning, bodily pain and general health.
Responses are recorded on a five-point Likert scale and then transformed onto a 100-point scale.
Score higher than 50 shows better health state and less pain experienced
|
4 week
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.
Sponsor
Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker
Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.
Generelle publikasjoner
- Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, Franco S, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Howard VJ, Huffman MD, Judd SE, Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Mackey RH, Magid DJ, Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, McGuire DK, Mohler ER 3rd, Moy CS, Mussolino ME, Neumar RW, Nichol G, Pandey DK, Paynter NP, Reeves MJ, Sorlie PD, Stein J, Towfighi A, Turan TN, Virani SS, Wong ND, Woo D, Turner MB; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014 Jan 21;129(3):399-410. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000442015.53336.12. No abstract available.
- Price KJ, Gordon BA, Bird SR, Benson AC. A review of guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation exercise programmes: Is there an international consensus? Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Nov;23(16):1715-1733. doi: 10.1177/2047487316657669. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
- Epstein AJ, Polsky D, Yang F, Yang L, Groeneveld PW. Coronary revascularization trends in the United States, 2001-2008. JAMA. 2011 May 4;305(17):1769-76. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.551.
- Deb S, Wijeysundera HC, Ko DT, Tsubota H, Hill S, Fremes SE. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review. JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2086-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281718.
- Hodge T. Fast Facts for the Cardiac Surgery Nurse: Caring for Cardiac Surgery Patients in a Nutshell: Springer Publishing Company; 2015.
Studierekorddatoer
Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
19. september 2020
Primær fullføring (Faktiske)
28. mars 2021
Studiet fullført (Faktiske)
31. mars 2021
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
2. februar 2021
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
4. februar 2021
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
5. februar 2021
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
1. juni 2022
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
31. mai 2022
Sist bekreftet
1. mai 2022
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Nøkkelord
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre studie-ID-numre
- REC00707 Huma Balqias
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
NEI
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Nei
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Nei
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .