Modified Sternal Precautions Versus Conventional Sternal Precautions in Physical Function After Sternotomy
31 de mayo de 2022 actualizado por: Riphah International University
Effectiveness of Modified Sternal Precautions Versus Conventional Sternal Precautions in Improving Physical Function After Sternotomy
This research study Effectiveness of modified sternal precautions versus conventional sternal precautions in improving physical function after sternotomy .After recruitment of the subjects, the intervention group will receive modified sternal precaution while the control group will receive conventional sternal precautions and they will be assess for their physical activity, kinesiophobia, quality of life and post sternotomy pain.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Terminado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
This study will address the scarcity of research and the variations in recommendations regarding sternal precautions and restrictions of upper limb movement in cardiac patients and will help to evaluate the effect of modified sternal precautions on patients' pain and functional activity.
As physical therapists are the ones who have maximum exposure to practice and teaching of sternal precautions, therefore this study will help to formulate the guidelines regarding the use of upper limb during cardiac rehabilitation exercises and making standards for sternal precautions and its management following cardiac surgery.
Tipo de estudio
Intervencionista
Inscripción (Actual)
40
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
KPK
-
Peshawar, KPK, Pakistán, 25000
- Rehman Medical Institute
-
-
Criterios de participación
Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
40 años a 65 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
No
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Masculino
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Open heart surgery patients (CABG and Valve surgeries)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unstable vitals
- Patient needing maximum assistance
- Decline consent
Plan de estudios
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Tratamiento
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Modified sternal precautions
Interventional group (Modified sternal precautions)
|
Use pain and discomfort to guide the safe use of the arms Avoid pushing or pulling with one arm Use both arms close to the body during lifting Use of arms is possible, but keep them close to the body Avoid stretching one or both arms backwards at the same time Use a cushion or perform sternal preservation technique (crossing the arms in a 'self-hugging 'posture) when coughing. When transferring, roll onto the side, ease the legs over the edge of the bed and carefully use the arms to sit up from a lying position |
|
Comparador activo: Conventional sternal precautions
Control group (Conventional sternal precautions)
|
Avoid pushing or pulling through the arms Avoid one-arm (unilateral) activity Limit the elevation of the arms to 90 degrees Avoid lifting objects heavier than 2 kg Use a cushion or perform sternal preservation technique (crossing the arms in a 'self-hugging' posture) when coughing Limit the use of the arms when transferring from sitting to standing and getting out of bed Avoid placing the arms behind the back
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Short physical performance battery
Periodo de tiempo: 4 Week
|
SPBB is a commonly used tool in clinical setting for measuring the physical performance of patients.
It is known for its feasibility and shorter time to conduct.
It has been used in different studies for reporting outcome measure post cardiac surgery.
This outcome measure is also selected due to its high validity and reliability.
The reliability of the test is 0.87.
It is divided into three subtests: balance, a short walk at normal pace and lastly standing up from a chair five times repeatedly.
These subsets exemplify core tasks being important for independent living.
|
4 Week
|
|
Functional difficulties questionnaire
Periodo de tiempo: 4 week
|
Functional difficulties questionnaire is a functional outcome measures that specially focuses on the thoracic region and upper limb movements in people following cardiac surgery.
The validity of the questionnaire is 0.971 while its reliability is 0.918.
The questionnaire is divided into 13 questions which consists of functional tasks, causing difficulty following cardiac surgery.
Participants are required to mark on an unmarked 10cm VAS the level of difficulty they experienced when completing each of the included tasks, based on the previous time they experience.
|
4 week
|
|
Tampa scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-II)
Periodo de tiempo: 4 week
|
It is a broadly used tool to measure pain related fear beliefs regarding movement and re-injury.
The validly of the questionnaire range between 0.74 to 0.87 and its reliability is 0.747.
It is a self-reported questionnaire.
It includes 11 questions scale on likert scale ranging from 1 to 4 where 1 means strongly disagree while 4 means strongly agree.
The total score ranges between 11 to 44.
Higher score indicate high level of kinesiopobhia.
A reduction of points equal or more than 3 points accounting for about 10% is considered as relevant change.
|
4 week
|
|
Mcgill pain questionnaire - short form version 2 (SF-MPQ-2)
Periodo de tiempo: 4 Week
|
It is one of the most widely used questionnaire for the measurement of pain.
Its benefit is that it provides valuable information on the sensory, affective and evaluative dimensions of pain experience by an individual.
It has a capability of discriminating among different types of pain problems.
It has become one of the most commonly used tests for the measurement of pain following cardiac surgery via sternotomy.
The reliability of the questionnaire ranges from 0.75 to 0.83.
|
4 Week
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Health survey (SF-36)
Periodo de tiempo: 4 week
|
This questionnaire provides overall measure of quality of recovery of patient according to the patient's perspective.
It is a reliable and valid tool used mainly in clinical practices to measure health related quality of life following cardiac surgery.
The reliability of scale is 0.65 to 0.96.
This tool consists of eight domains comprising of physical functioning, role physical functioning, role emotional functioning, mental health, vitality, social functioning, bodily pain and general health.
Responses are recorded on a five-point Likert scale and then transformed onto a 100-point scale.
Score higher than 50 shows better health state and less pain experienced
|
4 week
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.
Patrocinador
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.
Publicaciones Generales
- Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, Franco S, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Howard VJ, Huffman MD, Judd SE, Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Mackey RH, Magid DJ, Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, McGuire DK, Mohler ER 3rd, Moy CS, Mussolino ME, Neumar RW, Nichol G, Pandey DK, Paynter NP, Reeves MJ, Sorlie PD, Stein J, Towfighi A, Turan TN, Virani SS, Wong ND, Woo D, Turner MB; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014 Jan 21;129(3):399-410. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000442015.53336.12. No abstract available.
- Price KJ, Gordon BA, Bird SR, Benson AC. A review of guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation exercise programmes: Is there an international consensus? Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Nov;23(16):1715-1733. doi: 10.1177/2047487316657669. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
- Epstein AJ, Polsky D, Yang F, Yang L, Groeneveld PW. Coronary revascularization trends in the United States, 2001-2008. JAMA. 2011 May 4;305(17):1769-76. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.551.
- Deb S, Wijeysundera HC, Ko DT, Tsubota H, Hill S, Fremes SE. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review. JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2086-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281718.
- Hodge T. Fast Facts for the Cardiac Surgery Nurse: Caring for Cardiac Surgery Patients in a Nutshell: Springer Publishing Company; 2015.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
19 de septiembre de 2020
Finalización primaria (Actual)
28 de marzo de 2021
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
31 de marzo de 2021
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
2 de febrero de 2021
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
4 de febrero de 2021
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
5 de febrero de 2021
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
1 de junio de 2022
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
31 de mayo de 2022
Última verificación
1 de mayo de 2022
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- REC00707 Huma Balqias
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
NO
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .