Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Effects of Velocity-Based and Traditional Resistance Training on Performance in Trained Male Football Players (VBRT-TRT-FP)

11. juni 2026 oppdatert av: Ahmet Mor, Sinop University

Effects of Velocity-Based and Traditional Resistance Training on Physical Performance, Anaerobic Capacity, and Perceptual Responses in Trained Male Football Players

This study compared the effects of velocity-based resistance training (VBRT) and traditional resistance training (TRT) on physical performance, anaerobic capacity, and perceptual responses in trained male football players. Sixteen participants were randomly assigned to either a VBRT group or a TRT group and completed an 8-week resistance training program. The study aimed to determine whether VBRT provides greater improvements in explosive performance, anaerobic power, balance, football-specific performance, and fatigue-related perceptions compared with traditional percentage-based resistance training.

Studieoversikt

Detaljert beskrivelse

Resistance training is widely used in football to improve strength, power, and sport-specific performance. Traditional resistance training typically prescribes training loads based on fixed percentages of one-repetition maximum (1RM). However, this approach may not adequately account for daily fluctuations in neuromuscular readiness and fatigue. Velocity-based resistance training (VBRT) has emerged as an alternative method that uses movement velocity to individualize training load and regulate training effort.

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of velocity-based resistance training and traditional percentage-based resistance training in trained male football players. Participants were randomly assigned to either a VBRT group or a traditional resistance training (TRT) group and completed an 8-week resistance training intervention consisting of deep squat, half squat, and bench press exercises performed twice weekly.

In the VBRT group, training loads were adjusted using individualized load-velocity profiles and velocity-loss thresholds, whereas the TRT group trained using fixed percentages of baseline one-repetition maximum values. The study was designed to evaluate whether individualized velocity-based load prescription could improve neuromuscular performance and fatigue management compared with traditional resistance training methods.

The findings of this study may contribute to the understanding of practical resistance training strategies for football players and provide information regarding the effectiveness of velocity-based training for improving performance-related and fatigue-related adaptations.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

16

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

    • Sinop
      • Sinop, Sinop, Tyrkia (Türkiye), 57000
        • Sinop University, Faculty of Sport Sciences

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Ja

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male football players aged 18 to 25 years
  • Actively participating in organized football training and competition
  • At least 1 year of structured resistance training experience
  • Regular exposure to football-specific training loads
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Musculoskeletal injury within the previous 6 months
  • Neurological, orthopedic, or chronic disorders affecting physical performance
  • Use of ergogenic aids or supplements that could influence neuromuscular performance
  • Participation in additional resistance training outside the study protocol
  • Missing more than 10% of the scheduled training sessions

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Grunnvitenskap
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Velocity-Based Resistance Training (VBRT)
Participants completed an 8-week velocity-based resistance training program consisting of deep squat, half squat, and bench press exercises performed twice weekly. Training loads were prescribed using individualized load-velocity profiles and adjusted according to target movement velocities and a 20% velocity-loss threshold.
Participants completed an 8-week velocity-based resistance training program performed twice weekly. Training consisted of deep squat, half squat, and bench press exercises. Training loads were prescribed using individualized load-velocity profiles and adjusted according to target movement velocities and a 20% velocity-loss threshold.
Eksperimentell: Traditional Resistance Training (TRT)
Participants completed an 8-week traditional percentage-based resistance training program consisting of deep squat, half squat, and bench press exercises performed twice weekly. Training loads were prescribed using fixed percentages of baseline one-repetition maximum values and were not adjusted according to daily performance fluctuations.
Participants completed an 8-week traditional percentage-based resistance training program performed twice weekly. Training consisted of deep squat, half squat, and bench press exercises. Training loads were prescribed using fixed percentages of baseline one-repetition maximum values.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change From Baseline in Vertical Jump Height at 8 Weeks
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 8
Vertical jump height (cm) measured using a digital vertical jump device to assess lower-body explosive performance.
Baseline and Week 8

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

15. desember 2025

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

18. februar 2026

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

18. februar 2026

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

11. juni 2026

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

11. juni 2026

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

17. juni 2026

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

17. juni 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

11. juni 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. juni 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

NEI

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere