Long-term efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B: 5-year results

Xieer Liang, Zhiliang Gao, Qing Xie, Jiming Zhang, Jifang Sheng, Jun Cheng, Chengwei Chen, Qing Mao, Wei Zhao, Hong Ren, Deming Tan, Junqi Niu, Shijun Chen, Chen Pan, Hong Tang, Hao Wang, Yimin Mao, Jidong Jia, Qin Ning, Min Xu, Shanming Wu, Jun Li, Xinxin Zhang, Wenyan Zhang, Cui Xiong, Jinlin Hou, Xieer Liang, Zhiliang Gao, Qing Xie, Jiming Zhang, Jifang Sheng, Jun Cheng, Chengwei Chen, Qing Mao, Wei Zhao, Hong Ren, Deming Tan, Junqi Niu, Shijun Chen, Chen Pan, Hong Tang, Hao Wang, Yimin Mao, Jidong Jia, Qin Ning, Min Xu, Shanming Wu, Jun Li, Xinxin Zhang, Wenyan Zhang, Cui Xiong, Jinlin Hou

Abstract

Background and aim: Long-term treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) has demonstrated suppression of viral replication outside of China. This study aims to assess efficacy, resistance and safety of TDF for up to 240 weeks in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.

Methods: Patients (HBeAg-positive or HBeAg-negative) who were randomised to receive TDF 300 mg or adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) 10 mg once daily in the 48-week double-blind phase (N = 498) were eligible to enter the open-label TDF phase (TDF-TDF and ADV-TDF groups) for additional 192 weeks.

Results: Overall, 457/512 (89.3%) randomised patients completed 240 weeks of treatment. Virological suppression was achieved in 84.5% and 87.9% in HBeAg-positive patients and 89.6% and 89.5% in HBeAg-negative patients in TDF-TDF and ADV-TDF groups, respectively, at week 240. The majority of patients from both groups had normalized alanine transaminase levels. More patients had HBeAg loss (41.7% vs. 36.4%) and HBeAg seroconversion (32.0% vs. 28.3%) in TDF-TDF than in ADV-TDF group, respectively. Only one HBeAg-positive patient in TDF-TDF group had HBsAg loss at week 240. No evidence of resistance to TDF was observed. The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups (TDF-TDF, 56.4% vs. ADV-TDF, 51.6%). One patient had serum creatinine elevation ≥ 0.5 mg/dL above baseline, and three patients had confirmed grade 3/4 phosphorus abnormalities (< 2 mg/dL).

Conclusion: In Chinese patients with chronic HBV, long-term treatment with TDF showed sustained viral suppression without development of resistance up to 240 weeks. No new safety concerns were found with TDF in this patient population. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier NCT01300234; GSK Clinical Study Register 114648.

Keywords: Antiviral therapy; Chronic hepatitis B; Long-term tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; Virological suppression.

Conflict of interest statement

Jinlin Hou has received consulting fees and grant/research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Roche. Qin Ning has received consulting fees and grant/research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Novartis and Roche. Wenyan Zhang and Cui Xiong are employees of GlaxoSmithKline. All other authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient disposition. ADV, adefovir dipivoxil; o.d., once daily; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. †Three patients randomised to adefovir 10 mg group did not receive study treatment; hence, total safety and intent-to-treat population was N = 509
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportion of patients with HBV DNA a HBeAg-positive, b HBeAg-negative. ADV, adefovir dipivoxil; HBV, hepatitis B virus; ITT, intent-to-treat; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. †Data on file of global phase III pivotal studies [2, 5]
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Proportion of HVL and non-HVL patients with HBV DNA n = 82) and non-HVL (n = 427)

References

    1. World Health Organization. Hepatitis B Fact Sheet. Geneva: WHO; 2017. . Accessed 23 Aug 2018
    1. Buti M, Tsai N, Petersen J, et al. Seven-year efficacy and safety of treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:1457–1464. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3486-7.
    1. Hou JL, Gao ZL, Xie Q, et al. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs adefovir dipivoxil in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B after 48 weeks: a randomized controlled trial. J Viral Hepat. 2015;22:85–93. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12313.
    1. Yang HI, Yuen MF, Chan HL, et al. Risk estimation for hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B (REACH-B): development and validation of a predictive score. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:568–574. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70077-8.
    1. Marcellin P, Heathcote EJ, Buti M, et al. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus adefovir dipivoxil for chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2442–2455. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802878.
    1. Marcellin P, Gane E, Buti M, et al. Regression of cirrhosis during treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for chronic hepatitis B: a 5-year open-label follow-up study. Lancet. 2013;381:468–475. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61425-1.
    1. Marcellin P, Buti M, Krastev Z, et al. Kinetics of hepatitis B surface antigen loss in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. J Hepatol. 2014;61:1228–1237. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.07.019.
    1. Liang X, Xie Q, Tan D, et al. Interpretation of liver stiffness measurement-based approach for the monitoring of hepatitis B patients with antiviral therapy: a 2-year prospective study. J Viral Hepat. 2018;25:296–305. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12814.
    1. Kim MN, Kim SU, Kim BK, et al. Long-term changes of liver stiffness values assessed using transient elastography in patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving entecavir. Liver Int. 2014;34:1216–1223. doi: 10.1111/liv.12377.
    1. Hezode C, Castera L, Roudot-Thoraval F, et al. Liver stiffness diminishes with antiviral response in chronic hepatitis C. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34:656–663. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04765.x.
    1. Liu Y, Corsa AC, Buti M, et al. No detectable resistance to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in HBeAg+ and HBeAg− patients with chronic hepatitis B after 8 years of treatment. J Viral Hepat. 2017;24:68–74. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12613.
    1. Gordon SC, Krastev Z, Horban A, et al. Efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate at 240 weeks in patients with chronic hepatitis B with high baseline viral load. Hepatology. 2013;58:505–513. doi: 10.1002/hep.26277.
    1. Fung S, Gordon SC, Krastev Z, et al. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in Asian or Pacific Islander chronic hepatitis B patients with high viral load (>/= 9 log10 copies/ml) Liver Int. 2015;35:422–428. doi: 10.1111/liv.12694.
    1. Gish RG, Clark MD, Kane SD, Shaw RE, Mangahas MF, Baqai S. Similar risk of renal events among patients treated with tenofovir or entecavir for chronic hepatitis B. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:941–946. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.04.008.
    1. Marcellin P, Zoulim F, Hezode C, et al. Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in chronic hepatitis B: a 3-year, prospective, real-world study in France. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61:3072–3083. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-4027-8.
    1. Petersen J, Heyne R, Mauss S, et al. Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in chronic hepatitis B: a 3-year prospective field practice study in Germany. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61:3061–3071. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3960-x.
    1. Riveiro-Barciela M, Tabernero D, Calleja JL, et al. Effectiveness and safety of entecavir or tenofovir in a Spanish cohort of chronic hepatitis B patients: validation of the page-B score to predict hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62:784–793. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4448-7.
    1. Agarwal K, Brunetto M, Seto WK, et al. 96 weeks treatment of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2018;68:672–681. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.11.039.
    1. Buti M, Gane E, Seto WK, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;1:196–206. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30107-8.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere